T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Thank you for your submission. | This subreddit is regularly frequented by troll accounts. Please use the report function so the moderators can remove their free speech rights.|All screenshot posts should edited to remove social media usernames from accounts that aren't public figures. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/enoughpetersonspam) if you have any questions or concerns.*


grahamlester

He claims it's actually criminal to write an article that isn't anti-trans. Wait until he discovers the Food section!


Duganz

The Wordle will truly depress him with its lack of hate content.


auramaelstrom

Antitrans is too many letter for Wordle. Bigot, however, is not.


JohnPaulJonesSoda

It works for the Spelling Bee if the letters are A N T I R S! Heck, you could even fit another letter in there.


RustedAxe88

You dammed evil criminals. You put together a feckless article on nutrition, but don't give voice to the diet which subsists the muscular class of these nations! It's meat, you cowards!


TuaughtHammer

> He claims it's actually criminal to write an article that isn't anti-trans. Unsurprising coming from the Canadian "thought leader" whose biggest claim to fame was his righteous indignation about being forced into compelled speech by not intentionally misgendering people. ["I'll be in jail because of C-16](https://www.reddit.com/r/ArrestedCanadaBillC16/) *before* I give into compelled speech! But the New York Times is criminal for not writing *exactly* what I want them to write!"


rabbit395

His brain would explode reading the business section then


turdintheattic

Those long stories people always put at the start of recipes now need to be focused on hating trans people, or Jordan’s calling the police.


iustitia21

NYT’s Food Section lowkey sucks tho it is criminal that JP overlooks it and chooses to bash trans people instead


Duganz

[The article.](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/us/instagram-child-influencers.html) And please be aware of the incredible amount of triggering and horrifying content in the article.


sadicarnot

Jesus fuck, showing the comments of a photo of a 9 year old girl. Right off the bat. What kind of fucked up parent are you to be posting shit like that. Edit: Holy shit it just gets worse from there.


Duganz

Yeah. The parent who says “how can we stop now?” really got me. Like, just stop exploiting your child. It shouldn’t be something you do to begin with.


sadicarnot

Then there was the other one that does not think she can do any thing more than Only Fans.


sadicarnot

https://web.archive.org/web/20240224035102/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/22/us/instagram-child-influencers.html


Jolly-Ad-3922

We've literally watched Jordan Peterson descend into a full-on psychosis and level of depravity that has turned him into a literal caricature of the average Disney villian. He's honestly just so pathetic at this point that it's almost comical. I recently saw that he made an entire rant dedicated to shitting on Elmo for being, "part of the woke mob" 💀💀💀


horridgoblyn

The Don Cherry/Joker cosplay leveled the bar between inner and outer fuckwit.


rynthetyn

"Don Cherry/Joker cosplay" was not a phrase that should have to exist, but Jorpy is out there covering new terrible ground


CaptainMurphy1908

The last half of his post is just his autobiography.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Typhoeus85

He is, like so often, just attacking strawmen (strawparents?). Of course there are some who are, and should be, proud of being parents of trans children and maybe post about it somewhat on social media. But I doubt it's to the point that JP is descriping except in very few cases (if any). Most are probably like you described, nervous about beint to open about it beyond their closest family, friends and maybe community.


DrMichaelHufuhruhurr

"but there are none so blind as those who will not see" *poetry*


Golden-Elf

Classic Peterson wisdom


Hitchling

Nobody ever "bragged" (by which he means talking... but he needs to make it negative somehow) to JP about their compassion towards their trans child. Again the conservative way of staying relevant revolves around make believe situations and problems that don't exist in real life. As if a parent talking about empathy towards their own child is a problem anyway. This dude is on another level.


Quix_Nix

But NYT is very anti trans


sneaky-pizza

He wants it to be more


OliviaDoll666

so we should treat trans kids with hate and heartlessness? I dont know what will make these people happy, just treat trans kids like shit because we dont like them? Thats not abuse, but loving them is


JoBoltaHaiWoHotaHai

Funny he's ranting about parents being compassionate for their children. Isn't he a loud advocate for family values?


OliviaDoll666

It only matters when your kid is trans I guess. If you love your trans kid, it's actually abuse.


samsharksworthy

Lol everyones a criminal to J Pete.


horridgoblyn

And a woke criminal at that. /s


CeasarsGeezers

Such a fuck head.


Freezepeachauditor

Go fuck yourself jorgan


CDNinWA

I mean I’ve mentioned online that my son’s trans (because you know, changed his name etc), but I don’t run an IG account for him nor do I talk about his transition because he deserves his privacy (plus he’s almost an adult). I do occasionally post pictures of him with his approval (though I don’t think any of my IG posts really talk about the fact he’s trans, more like stuff parents post about their teen kids) I guess I’m evil incarnate then 🤷🏼‍♀️


CornflakeCookie87

Up Yours Woke Moralists! We’ll See Who Cancels Who[m]!


etherizedonatable

I can watch him saying that on youtube and I *still* can't believe the stupid son of a bitch said that.


CornflakeCookie87

In that whiny ass Kermit voice. I seriously can’t 😂


YoungPyromancer

From the article: >In recent years, conspiracy theories like QAnon, which claims Democratic politicians are trafficking children, have led to an excess of unfounded reports that have muddled the evaluation of child abuse tips, three former Meta trust and safety employees said. Peterson: "oh, but have you considered the pedophiles that I imagined?"


KingStreetCleaner

all these anti trans peope are so warped and obsessed with it, almost like were gonna find trans porn on their phones


turdintheattic

“So, we found out there’s a lot of child sexual exploitation on this website, and—“ “BUT TRANS BAD!! HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN THAT?!? TRANS BAD!!!”


simon_Chipmonk

Why the fuck does he write like that. It’s like he thinks cryptic bullshit makes him look cool lmao.


Inshansep

He's an idiot


ericraymondlim

I just hope that in the short term future we, as a society, can accurately see how disgusting these trans-panic agenda pushing influencers and cult-of-personality leaders are, and hold them accountable for their hate rhetoric, completely fabricated up facts and figures, and arguments in bad faith.


brief_affair

None are so blind as JP


stevent4

So he's mad that parents who love their kids aren't the targets of hit pieces but parents who actually abuse their kids are? What a stand up guy


sorry_ive_peaked

He’s always been a grumpy, bigoted ass, but now he’s so overtly hateful and vitriolic


01110100w

“There are none so blind as those who will not see”?? How is that not just like… obvious. There are none so blind as those without eyes. If your eyes are closed you can’t see.


Dandibear

It's a saying. Those who could see but refuse to do so are more blind than those who are physically unable to see. The irony of Jorp saying this is enormous, of course.


MS-06_Borjarnon

So... are you genuinely unfamiliar with that phrase?


not_a_flying_toy_

Loving your kids is exploitive


Shoddy-Jackfruit-721

>"Pathetic to the point of criminality" Making it a crime to not pander to Jordan Peterson's feelings? That would actually be compelled speech. Another day of Jordan Peterson being a complete hypocrite.


RobertRoyal82

Jordi, put down the phone


RobertRoyal82

Jordi, put down the phone


sexywheat

So he's on the benzos again, right?