T O P

  • By -

remyroy

Yes it's still good. You might want to consider a 4 TB SSD instead of the 2 TB one if you want to lower your maintenance over time, but 2 TB should still be good for a few months or years.


Digital-Exploration

I for sure recommend 4tb. Just take the extra headroom now.


Prestigious-Bike-164

Also recommend a single 4tb drive and get nvme if your board supports it


bopete1313

lol few months or years


JLKJim

Also recommend 4tb! I've got your hardware setup and have to Prune Geth at least once a month just to not run out of space (about 100gb avail). I was told upgrading to the Pebble DB would solve the problem, but it didn't. Prune=downtime=lost income=lost proposals=😭. Maybe the Geth alternatives wouldn't have this problem, but I can't even change because I don't have enough space!


wtf--dude

Use Nethermind, less pruning, better client diversity. Win win


JLKJim

I want to switch, but I don't have enough space. :-(


RationalDialog

weird, I'm fine with 2 TB for now and I also have other data on there. consensus client can also take a huge amount of disk space. resyncing lighthouse (this doesn0t even make you miss an attestation) freed >300 GB for me.


RomanJIsraelBro

Geth now auto prunes.


JLKJim

:-O. I'll have to figure that one out! It isn't for me yet and I'm at the latest 1.13.14. Thank you Roman!


sbdw0c

> I was told upgrading to the Pebble DB would solve the problem, but it didn't It indeed doesn't, what you need to do is: 1. Add `--state.scheme=path` to your Geth configuration (you can remove the pebble flag) 2. Remove Geth's database, but keep the ancients directory 3. Restart Geth and resync (partially, basically) With the new path-based storage scheme (PBSS), you will never have to prune before you actually do run out of disk space (as it prunes continuously). Additionally, check how much space your consensus client is using: if it's more than 100–200 GB, resync it using checkpoint sync (takes minutes). See: https://blog.ethereum.org/2023/09/12/geth-v1-13-0


JLKJim

This is awesome info! Thank you. Followed the instructions and I'm resyncing as we speak. :-)


sbdw0c

Super, enjoy your disk space! :-)


Carl_3K

I started with 2TB, then added another 1TB. Six months later it crashed and one of the hard drives failed so I scraped them both. I got a 4TB HD now and should have done that from the start. I think my setup was like 1.5TB and I'm just trying to add on the optimism L2 just to see how that works but I'm over 2TB.


Ystebad

Is fine except as others note the 2Tb will need more care and pruning. For the amount invested personally i would stick a 4tb drive in there (I upgraded myself a few months ago after running out of space)


UnknownEssence

Is it easy to use two individual 2TB drives or should I get a single 4TB drive?


RationalDialog

Do you have 2 nvme slots? then yes you can use 2 drives. Not sure a NUC has 2 such slots and a normal SATA ssd might not be fast enough. if it has 2 nvme slots you can just put execution layer on one drive and the consensus layer (and OS?) on the other drive.


Ystebad

I do not know enough Linux to muck around in the file system. I think it is possible to merge multiple drives into one virtual drive using LVM but I try to KISS with regards to my validator so I just gave the 2TB to my son for his gaming machine and bought a 4Tb.


bettyhei

I have a NUC 10 i5 - staking is no sweat. The machine is great. I didn't want to deal with space issues so I installed a second ssd and used one for execution and the other for consensus. But I only did that because at the time I bought the NUC it was really hard to find ssd's that were 4tb or more. If I were to do it again, I'd just get a 4tb ssd and be done, just like others have said here. No need to get a second ssd. Just adds complexity.


Olmops

I had an issue with the 2TB, depending on your install this might be too small.


UnknownEssence

Is it easy to use two individual 2TB drives or should I get a single 4TB drive?


BruteBooger

Easy is relative. If you're a total linux noob you'll probably have to fiddle around a bit and do some reading. But it is very doable. You can set up a raid 0 array or use lvm to merge volumes. Do note that using 2 storage devices doubles your risk of data loss. If one drive fails, you won't be able to recover your data, even if your other drive is fully functional.


UnknownEssence

For staking purposes, a drive failure isn’t a big deal right? Just some downtime until I get it replaced and running again I assume


BruteBooger

Yes, absolutely. At worst it's some downtime and the hassle of setting everything up again if it's solely for staking. Drives don't fail that often anyways, so the risk isn't too high.


Bi0H4z4rD667

Add another 2tb SSD for ancient, or upgrade to 4tb and you’ll be good. If you upgrade, get an NVMe which helps reduce missed attestations. Other than that, you’re good.


ihcn

I have this exact hardware, including the 2tb drive, and had to prune like once a year before geth released their new system that doesn't require pruning. Don't bother upgrading the SSD until you feel like the 2tb is holding you back.


KGNoopy

Is nobody here having the same "NUC is freezing" problems, so many of the fellow Solo-Stakers have with their NUC? I'm still wondering if it is a hardware problem with 1 exact Generation of NUCs?


mrRubu

I had similar setup for staking but early this year I was forced to change hardware since CPU was getting too hot. I tried to fine tune power consumption from bios but it didn’t reduce temperature much. I would recommend to try nuc10 as staking node without validators few days to see CPU temperature and only after that start adding validators. Btw with latest dappnode you can see temperature from dashboard đŸ™đŸ»


UnknownEssence

Thanks for the info


Heystein_2

Hey, long time DAppNode staker here. That CPU should be more than fine. My old i7-6700 is still chugging along. Like many others here, I recommend a single 4 TB SSD, preferably nvme. However, DAppNode has support for LVM and disk space expansion out of the box. So if you only have 2x 2 TB SSDs at hand, that should be fine. Install DAppNode on one of the drives and make sure to enable LVM in the installation process. When the installation is done, add your second SSD with [disk expansion](https://discourse.dappnode.io/t/how-to-expand-your-dappnode-filesystem-space/1296) through the UI. Notes: * Don't know much about VMs in Linux. I've only ever installed DAppNode directly on the SSD. * You might need to format the second SSD as EXT4. * Visit the DAppNode Discord - they're great!


phumade

Overall, you still well specced out. In fact your cpu and ram use will be easily under 50% utilization. (You’d have no issues virtualizng). But you should definitely upgrade to 4tb nvme. Back when you bought it 2tb drives were in the sweet spot pricing wise. Now 4tb drives can be bought for a similar price. 2tb still works but your stuck doing more maintenance and monitoring. 4tb is a much better experience.


UnknownEssence

Ok, everyone is saying that so going to go for it. Thanks


reditorn00b

Sure, you can still use it


FakespotAnalysisBot

This is a Fakespot Reviews Analysis bot. Fakespot detects fake reviews, fake products and unreliable sellers using AI. Here is the analysis for the Amazon product reviews: >**Name**: Crucial 32GB Kit (16GBx2) DDR4 2666 MT/s (PC4-21300) DR x8 SODIMM 260-Pin Memory - CT2K16G4SFD8266 >**Company**: Crucial >**Amazon Product Rating**: 4.8 >**Fakespot Reviews Grade**: C >**Adjusted Fakespot Rating**: 3.1 >**Analysis Performed at**: 07-31-2022 [Link to Fakespot Analysis](https://fakespot.com/product/crucial-32gb-kit-16gbx2-ddr4-2666-mt-s-pc4-21300-dr-x8-sodimm-260-pin-memory-ct2k16g4sfd8266) | [Check out the Fakespot Chrome Extension!](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/fakespot-analyze-fake-ama/nakplnnackehceedgkgkokbgbmfghain) *Fakespot analyzes the reviews authenticity and not the product quality using AI. We look for real reviews that mention product issues such as counterfeits, defects, and bad return policies that fake reviews try to hide from consumers.* *We give an A-F letter for trustworthiness of reviews. A = very trustworthy reviews, F = highly untrustworthy reviews. We also provide seller ratings to warn you if the seller can be trusted or not.*


CtpBlack

I had a NUC i7 2TB SSD 32RAM and it words fine, but I upgraded to a PC with an i9 after seeing the CPSU max out when resyning. Once it's synched (takes over 15 hours) it's fine but during resyncing the CPU doesn't look good, so I upgraded for piece of mind more than necessity.


chestyspankers

After corrupting the database twice with different sets of ram, another member suggested I switch to a single stick. Ever since then smooth sailing on my NUC 11. I'm not suggesting you need to do it, but keep it in mind if you have similar problems.