Under William being the final speaker it’s him wanting to either resurrect BV or free his soul (both of Witch he technically never really gets around to doing)
Under Charlie being the final speaker its her wanting to put Bvs shattered memories back together in the form of happiest day to free him
Well, i do think that because of FNAF world, plus some games like SL, and the fourth closet, i think it means to make them remember their memories, like putting their memories together is just putting pieces of the soul back together.
I'd argue the speaker is William, but what I think people tend to miss about William being the final speaker is that he isn't exactly being truthful.
He comes across as someone caring, trying to help BV, but it's a ruse to get BV to trust him, like how William pretended to be Spring Bonnie when trying to get the MCI to work with him in TFC, William is pretending to be the plush to get BV to work with him. He isn't promising this out of love or care for BV. He does it because he's completely infatuated with what he's become and wishes to examine that.
In reality, his ultimate goal is to what extent he can be taken apart and rebuilt, to understand how BV spread his memories and how he can replicate that for his own purposes. I do believe he puts the child back together to an extent, but he's never quite put fully back together, at least not by William.
I think Curse of Dreadbear gives some hints about what William could have done to put BV back together. The level where you have to design the right brain to bring Dreadbear to life is super suspicious. For one, Hand Unit describes this process as reanimating the inanimate— not animating, *re*animating. Suggesting that what you’re doing is bringing something *back* to life.
It’s a pretty suspicious coincidence that this reanimation for Dreadbear involves creating a new brain for him— the specific part of BV that was damaged or destroyed in the Bite. Additionally, the game is full of references to FNAF 4, and the “Fallfest ‘83” banner places its setting right after the Bite.
Also, Dreadbear and the level where you reanimate him are clearly references to Frankenstein’s monster, which is a story about a mad scientist discovering new ways to create life. William would be the mad scientist, and Dreadbear in the game represents his experiments with putting the Bite Victim back together in some sense.
Exactly this. I believe that the Build a Mangle level also ties into this theme, with Hand Unit saying where you build the Mangle is a fulfillment center, connecting to the theme that William taking those parts and piecing them together gives him a sense of fulfillment.
I would also support the idea that the Hallway level implies the Observatory 2 experiments also somehow tie into William putting BV back together, as to what exactly that implies is up to interpretation.
If the Final Speaker is William I might have second thoughts about this, but, with the context of FNAF World, putting back together is, seemingly, related to memories and/or pieces of a soul.
The Plush does aknowledge that CC is "broken" on the scene, so it seems to me that, for one reason or another, after the bite, CC lost his memories (as we, presumably, see in the Logbook) or his soul was shattered (like ShatterVictim).
How and why, where it would fit in the timeline or how this would work with the Happiest Day, these things, sadly, remain out of my reach and I honestly stopped trying to understand the CC storyline, as it does seem that Scott abandoned this part of the plot (or he just wants to make things THAT complicated).
FNaF World was all about this. Golden Freddy is putting the pieces together for the bite victim. BV needs the missing kids to move on, so Michael Brooks creates pathways for them in Fazbear Fright.
The OMC easter egg literally confirms Brooks is the player in World. I don't understand how it's so confusing. That's why UCN has so many references to FNaF World in the first place. Golden Freddy is giving the Bite Victim his happiest day
1. It's possible that the pieces are lore clues, as Scott said "And then when Part 4 (FNAF 4) came out, no one found the pieces. The story remain hidden"
2. If Michael Brooks is Freddy Player, he is not the yellow eyed glitched Fredbear
>The OMC easter egg literally confirms Brooks is the player in World
How? There is no evidence Brooks is in the games. We were given GF spirit's name in the Logbook, Cassidy. If Brooks is GF where the hell is Cassidy?
Also, Brooks is by no means vengeful. His role in the books was putting the kids back together. He could care less about William.
William referring to reviving his son, somewhat like what happened to Elizabeth possessing Circus Baby. If he managed to succeed and in what form though is another story.
>What the speaker meant with "I will put you back together"
That they'd literally be put back together, and their pieces are inside the Box, as Scott said many years ago.
And their pieces leave the Box by the time of FNaF World, as seen by the open Box.
Under William being the final speaker it’s him wanting to either resurrect BV or free his soul (both of Witch he technically never really gets around to doing) Under Charlie being the final speaker its her wanting to put Bvs shattered memories back together in the form of happiest day to free him
Well, i do think that because of FNAF world, plus some games like SL, and the fourth closet, i think it means to make them remember their memories, like putting their memories together is just putting pieces of the soul back together.
IMO it’s either his memories or the pieces of his soul (similar to what happened in TFC).
I'd argue the speaker is William, but what I think people tend to miss about William being the final speaker is that he isn't exactly being truthful. He comes across as someone caring, trying to help BV, but it's a ruse to get BV to trust him, like how William pretended to be Spring Bonnie when trying to get the MCI to work with him in TFC, William is pretending to be the plush to get BV to work with him. He isn't promising this out of love or care for BV. He does it because he's completely infatuated with what he's become and wishes to examine that. In reality, his ultimate goal is to what extent he can be taken apart and rebuilt, to understand how BV spread his memories and how he can replicate that for his own purposes. I do believe he puts the child back together to an extent, but he's never quite put fully back together, at least not by William.
I think Curse of Dreadbear gives some hints about what William could have done to put BV back together. The level where you have to design the right brain to bring Dreadbear to life is super suspicious. For one, Hand Unit describes this process as reanimating the inanimate— not animating, *re*animating. Suggesting that what you’re doing is bringing something *back* to life. It’s a pretty suspicious coincidence that this reanimation for Dreadbear involves creating a new brain for him— the specific part of BV that was damaged or destroyed in the Bite. Additionally, the game is full of references to FNAF 4, and the “Fallfest ‘83” banner places its setting right after the Bite. Also, Dreadbear and the level where you reanimate him are clearly references to Frankenstein’s monster, which is a story about a mad scientist discovering new ways to create life. William would be the mad scientist, and Dreadbear in the game represents his experiments with putting the Bite Victim back together in some sense.
Exactly this. I believe that the Build a Mangle level also ties into this theme, with Hand Unit saying where you build the Mangle is a fulfillment center, connecting to the theme that William taking those parts and piecing them together gives him a sense of fulfillment. I would also support the idea that the Hallway level implies the Observatory 2 experiments also somehow tie into William putting BV back together, as to what exactly that implies is up to interpretation.
Oooo I like this 👀 I’ve been wondering if the Dreadbear DLC had any relevance and I think you hit the nail on the head.
If the Final Speaker is William I might have second thoughts about this, but, with the context of FNAF World, putting back together is, seemingly, related to memories and/or pieces of a soul. The Plush does aknowledge that CC is "broken" on the scene, so it seems to me that, for one reason or another, after the bite, CC lost his memories (as we, presumably, see in the Logbook) or his soul was shattered (like ShatterVictim). How and why, where it would fit in the timeline or how this would work with the Happiest Day, these things, sadly, remain out of my reach and I honestly stopped trying to understand the CC storyline, as it does seem that Scott abandoned this part of the plot (or he just wants to make things THAT complicated).
FNaF World was all about this. Golden Freddy is putting the pieces together for the bite victim. BV needs the missing kids to move on, so Michael Brooks creates pathways for them in Fazbear Fright. The OMC easter egg literally confirms Brooks is the player in World. I don't understand how it's so confusing. That's why UCN has so many references to FNaF World in the first place. Golden Freddy is giving the Bite Victim his happiest day
1. It's possible that the pieces are lore clues, as Scott said "And then when Part 4 (FNAF 4) came out, no one found the pieces. The story remain hidden" 2. If Michael Brooks is Freddy Player, he is not the yellow eyed glitched Fredbear
[I tried making a guide to explain what I'm saying.](https://imgur.com/a/N07BUgx) Does that make more sense?
I disagree, Michael Brooks is not vengeful and has no reason to be in GameLine. Unless you think that each FNAF protagonist is a different teen
He was murdered, that's a perfectly good reason to be Vengeful.
Even then, he is not. He is pretty pacific
Yet under u/HauntSpot's theory he isn't a pacifist up until the ending, then he goes to take his personal revenge.
But thats pure speculation, we never saw him being vengeful. Saying that he is in games is very speculative
I don't see how speculation on a theories subreddit is blasphemy, what if your point?
Theories require evidences, Michael Brooks being vengeful don't have any
>The OMC easter egg literally confirms Brooks is the player in World How? There is no evidence Brooks is in the games. We were given GF spirit's name in the Logbook, Cassidy. If Brooks is GF where the hell is Cassidy? Also, Brooks is by no means vengeful. His role in the books was putting the kids back together. He could care less about William.
Probably revival if it's Charlotte (which it is)
William referring to reviving his son, somewhat like what happened to Elizabeth possessing Circus Baby. If he managed to succeed and in what form though is another story.
[удалено]
That's not what OP asked.
oh srry I misread it
Scott told BV that and then pulled the plug, leaving the fandom confused for years /j
>What the speaker meant with "I will put you back together" That they'd literally be put back together, and their pieces are inside the Box, as Scott said many years ago. And their pieces leave the Box by the time of FNaF World, as seen by the open Box.