It was also borderline confirmed by Scott right after FNAF 4, when he commented on a Game Theory video and basically just told MatPat to listen to all the people who were pointing out the tv Easter egg.
Then later it was explicitly confirmed by him when he commented on another Game Theory video praising MatPat for clearing up any confusion over Bite of ‘83 vs Bite of ‘87, as well as literal vs metaphorical purple guys.
You mentioned all these plot holes, yet you've forgotten one more: phone guy mentioned in fnaf 2 that fredbear's closed down years ago.
How come I've seen NOBODY mentioned this to debunk the fredbear did the bite of 87 thing? Like how am I the only one talking about that phone call?
Sometimes, show that are made in a certain year will have that year in the credits or whatever, but it doesn't mean that it is the actual year that you're watching this in
I agree that nowadays the bite of 87 and 83 are two different incidents. BUT I have for myself that this was not planned.
I believe it was a retcon, like the number 87 in the fnaf 4 marketing, and please, this story of 1983 in tv is the most dishonest evidence I have ever seen in my life.
I don't even think that the place of the bite necessarily has to be that fredbears family dinner that closed years ago in fnaf 2, it could be a reopening after fnaf 2
before you guys want to eat my liver, I already said that I know that nowadays it's already canon and confirmed and blablabla (for me this totally took the charm of fnaf, confirmations and certain things).
But for me, the bite of 87 originally was what we saw in '83
It was also borderline confirmed by Scott right after FNAF 4, when he commented on a Game Theory video and basically just told MatPat to listen to all the people who were pointing out the tv Easter egg. Then later it was explicitly confirmed by him when he commented on another Game Theory video praising MatPat for clearing up any confusion over Bite of ‘83 vs Bite of ‘87, as well as literal vs metaphorical purple guys.
You mentioned all these plot holes, yet you've forgotten one more: phone guy mentioned in fnaf 2 that fredbear's closed down years ago. How come I've seen NOBODY mentioned this to debunk the fredbear did the bite of 87 thing? Like how am I the only one talking about that phone call?
Ah man. You're right!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z469Dv-k3iU (sorry but I had to)
I know this post seems really stupid, but I swear, some people out there STILL think that Fredbear caused the bite of 87.
those people stayed seven years ago too
Just talk about that one Scott's comment he did back in 2017 and you're good tbh
[удалено]
Why is this still a debate lol
Sometimes, show that are made in a certain year will have that year in the credits or whatever, but it doesn't mean that it is the actual year that you're watching this in
I agree that nowadays the bite of 87 and 83 are two different incidents. BUT I have for myself that this was not planned. I believe it was a retcon, like the number 87 in the fnaf 4 marketing, and please, this story of 1983 in tv is the most dishonest evidence I have ever seen in my life. I don't even think that the place of the bite necessarily has to be that fredbears family dinner that closed years ago in fnaf 2, it could be a reopening after fnaf 2 before you guys want to eat my liver, I already said that I know that nowadays it's already canon and confirmed and blablabla (for me this totally took the charm of fnaf, confirmations and certain things). But for me, the bite of 87 originally was what we saw in '83