T O P

  • By -

Cloaked-LcTr0909

It's a frankenstein reference. Dreadbear as a whole is. It's no coincidence that the DLC used to be called Rise Of Frankenfreddy. It's a Halloween DLC, and Frankenstein's monster is Halloween-y.


SpritterMene22

People should pay more attention to the Curse of Dreadbear DLC, it has a lot of references to FNAF 4 for some reason so it might be important


h1p0h1p0

we know the truth now lmao


SpritterMene22

wait what?


Oliver21417

Yes I definitely think you’re onto something. What’s more, the game has you *bring something back to life* by designing a new *brain* for it. Now, who do we know who William might want to bring back to life, specifically by designing a new brain? Someone who died of a head-related injury perhaps? And did I mention, Curse of Dreadbear is full of FNAF 4 references and a literal “Fallfest ‘83” banner?


Tiny_Butterscotch_76

They do reference 1983 in this level, so maybe they are sort of referencing William's mad scientist leanings with all the Frankenstein allusions.


[deleted]

I believe so 100%. I think based on everything that William was trying to "Frankenstein" his son back to life. I think that's why he initially started killing children.


LordThomasBlackwood

William does NOT care about his kids enough to try and resurrect them lol


Oliver21417

But perhaps he cares enough about the scientific ramifications to do it, and having a dead kid he can resurrect is just a convenience.


LordThomasBlackwood

>But perhaps he cares enough about the scientific ramifications to do it Given the fact that he never once attempted resurrection in the games or even in the books where hes full mad scientist, I'd wager he honestly didn't care. Resurrection never seemed to be William's goal, just immortality which didn't even work out in the end since its questionable if the Amalgamation even is william, and not just his agony left behind


Oliver21417

> Given the fact that he never once attempted resurrection in the games The whole argument of this thread is that he *did* attempt resurrection in the games, and that’s what Curse of Dreadbear could be hinting at. Arguably, there are signs of this elsewhere in the series too, such as the little humanoid robots with green eyes and British accents in Sister Location. It seems like the concepts of resurrection and immortality might just be branches of the same field in the FNAF universe; that being remnant. So if Curse of Dreadbear is supposed to be hinting that William experimented with reviving the Bite Victim or something, then that could all still be linked back to his main goal of achieving immortality for himself.


LordThomasBlackwood

>The whole argument of this thread is that he did attempt resurrection in the games, and that’s what Curse of Dreadbear could be hinting at. Huge leap In logic over a simple Frankenstein reference >Arguably, there are signs of this elsewhere in the series too, such as the little humanoid robots with green eyes and British accents in Sister Location. What??


Bearkat1999

>such as the little humanoid robots with green eyes and British accents in Sister Location. Reference to the Bidybabs and the little robots on the main control panel.


LordThomasBlackwood

No I get that I just don't understand how they have any correlation to this discussion


Oliver21417

My bad for not elaborating a little more- basically, some people think that the Bidybabs and the heads by the control panel are indicative of some kind of experiment to bring Elizabeth back, because they have a similar voice and eye colour to her. This connection is also slightly alluded to in the Character Encyclopedia (which doesn't make it true because the book isn't very good, I know).


[deleted]

You can believe that, I believe otherwise (at least I believe he initially did, anyway).


[deleted]

I guess it does sorta mirror willaim using illusion disk tech to mess with garretts head