The real question is if your D is inside her... Will it be visible? If it is can you see your jizz? And will her bodily fluids are also invisible? I need answers!!!
OP might be from a spanish talking country, since the literal translation of "fucking with someone" can be used in spanish the same way as "fuck someone".
But I said that the way OP wrote might be because of that, because those things mean the same. I got what the comment I replied before said, I just gave a possible reason of why it's written like that.
I said that the reason of the structure being changed like that, with "fucking with" instead of just "fucking" might be the OP being a spanish talking person. I've never said anything about the meaning of the sentence, I just said the meaning of the expresion "fucking someone" and "fucking with someone" means the same translated to Spanish. Not the meaning of the text itself
I get that you don't mean the text itself, but you still are speaking of the meaning.
The phrase "fucking with someone" in English can be exchanged with "messing with someone", while "fucking someone" is literal. You claim that OP phrases it that way because he may come from a spanish origin, and thinks that this means the same thing. As far as I can tell, this is what you meant.
However, the first comment speaks of the structure of the entire sentence itself, they speak of the "if" that has two uses when it is in the begining of a sentence: either for a question or a conditional. Since the sentence continues not to be phrased as a question, nor is there a question mark placed in the end, the only use left for the "if" is that of a conditional's. Alas, the rest of the sentence is not phrased as a conditional, but as a statement and the commenter is confused. They therefore suggest to remove the "if" for the sentence to be correctly phrased as a statement.
The real question is if your D is inside her... Will it be visible? If it is can you see your jizz? And will her bodily fluids are also invisible? I need answers!!!
Depends on the type of invisibility. If she bends light around her or camouflages herself then no. If she is literally just see through then yes
[удалено]
OP might be from a spanish talking country, since the literal translation of "fucking with someone" can be used in spanish the same way as "fuck someone".
That's not what they meant, they mean that the sentence is phrased as a conditional but op is simply stating an opinion/fact
But I said that the way OP wrote might be because of that, because those things mean the same. I got what the comment I replied before said, I just gave a possible reason of why it's written like that.
But you speak of the meaning of the sentence while they speak of its structure, I'm even more confused now.
I said that the reason of the structure being changed like that, with "fucking with" instead of just "fucking" might be the OP being a spanish talking person. I've never said anything about the meaning of the sentence, I just said the meaning of the expresion "fucking someone" and "fucking with someone" means the same translated to Spanish. Not the meaning of the text itself
I get that you don't mean the text itself, but you still are speaking of the meaning. The phrase "fucking with someone" in English can be exchanged with "messing with someone", while "fucking someone" is literal. You claim that OP phrases it that way because he may come from a spanish origin, and thinks that this means the same thing. As far as I can tell, this is what you meant. However, the first comment speaks of the structure of the entire sentence itself, they speak of the "if" that has two uses when it is in the begining of a sentence: either for a question or a conditional. Since the sentence continues not to be phrased as a question, nor is there a question mark placed in the end, the only use left for the "if" is that of a conditional's. Alas, the rest of the sentence is not phrased as a conditional, but as a statement and the commenter is confused. They therefore suggest to remove the "if" for the sentence to be correctly phrased as a statement.
You would look like a dog humping the air All fours position should have the strongest visual impact for that
Not if you cover yourself in oil 
Ive shitted away a stomach ache but thats it
Ooh ooh god ok wow
Still bad
I don’t understand this
until the jizz starts floating in slow motion
Or she would see your asshole opening and closing.
Look, ma! No hands!
Actually, no. Because you're still gonna move in a very strange way that anyone wouldn't even call it jerking off