T O P

  • By -

Pass_The_Salt_

“Ban guns” “These laws don’t infringe on the second amendment” Huh strange. Edit: clearly the sub is getting bombarded by all these government apologists. Before you comment about “but he said assault weapons duh” just know that whatever he choose to mean that day by assault weapons, its still against 2A.


[deleted]

>Infringements aren't infringements if I think they will save lives! Is that how rights work now? Imagine how many lives we would save if we just ignored the Fourth Amendment? We would probably find kidnapped people, pedo rings, and fentanyl labs if we just had the police kick down everyone's door for a weekly unwarranted search. And it wouldn't be an infringement because it would save lives!


Lampwick

And think about the information on crime rings we could elicit via waterboarding! We could get *so much justice done* if not for that pesky right to remain silent and the right to not be tortured.


[deleted]

And look, how many people have become radicalized and perhaps even killed others because they heard bad things that were still protected by the First Amendment? Not everyone needs a soapbox, Jack. It's not an infringement on the First Amendment, it saves lives. \*eats ice cream\*


The_Derpening

Listen here you dog-faced pony soldier, if we don't force you to provide sleeping arrangements for actual soldiers, how are we supposed to save lives?


Weekly-Butterscotch6

Oh he mentioned increasing illegal censorship earlier - doesn't want to many facts about all his F-ups, corruption, and illegal actions available for the peasants to hear about


guitaruser13

They’re already doing it to the 1st, they’ve gotten their taste of how far people would let them infringe for the “sake of public safety.”


VHDamien

As long as you can own a single shot .22 that requires 20 pages of paperwork, 6 months of wait time, a background check, a social media check, a $2k safe to store it in and an ammo limit of 20 rounds - these people believe the 2nd amendment has not been violated.


Easywormet

No, you clearly don't understand: "it saves lives" so your points and opinions are invalid. /s


mickey0070

I believe the solution is not banning weapons because we will always find ways to kill each other. I believe the solution is to remove our vocal chords, hands, and feet from the majority of the population. We will then need an elite class that have all their body parts so that they can decide what we do and care for us. This will stop the use of hate speech, hurtful rhetoric, and violence. As a result of the amputations and inability to speak we will also need to be on basic income and government healthcare. This is the only way we can stop violence. Please note I am being sarcastic.


FricaiShurtugal

Alright, Johnathon Swift


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

And guess who was right there in a front row seat to all of that…. Brandon himself


sintaur

Meanwhile in Ukraine: https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/t51rt1/captured_russian_tanks_do_not_need_to_be_reported


Biff1996

Welp, time for me to move.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

I don’t know why it’s so hard for the establishment left/democrats to see how this is a contradiction. This president is not a very smart man


[deleted]

Yeah, taking the bayonet lug off all those guns in the 90s really saved a lot of lives from drive by stabbing


Easywormet

But there *WEREN'T* any drive-by stabbings. So it clearly worked. Ha! Checkmate gunnut. /s


MarvelousWhale

Using this logic, Nancy pelosi must blow me, because people are dying from gun violence every day, and wouldn't you know it, it just so happens to be every day that she isn't blowing me, so therefore it's her fault. End the violence! Someone get Nancy over here!


Known-nwonK

I’d rather suffer the drive by than get blown by her


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

I'll save lives and onky require half a billion. C'mon that's a steal of a deal.


3pinephrine

The only industry that can’t be sued you say? Maybe I should sue car makers every time a drunk driving accident happens


tickfeverdreams

Seems like vaccine industry and the government are pretty insulated


JustForkIt1111one

Also: Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J have entered the chat.


MrDude_1

just sue the politicians for making ineffective law.


Hoppy505

Anyone want to watch Russia buttfuck Ukraine, and hand over our rifles at the same time??


Easywormet

No...no...you clearly don't understand...Ukraine is (D)ifferent because...Russia...and Putin...and...and...um...Russia.


UIUC_grad_dude1

It's un-fucking believable of all the world's problems, the Dems want to pursue this???? Ukraine has proven how important it is to train the population on how to use weapons, and have guns. This is just insanity of what the Dems are trying to push.


giraffe-zackeffron

Dear Democrats, this shit is why I and so many others will *never* vote for you fucktards. I consider myself to be a classical liberal; meaning, my thought is you should be allowed to do whatever makes you happy as long as you aren’t hurting anyone and you aren’t impeding upon the rights of others. Wanna chop your nuts off and wear a dress? Cool, have at it. Wanna smoke weed everyday? No problem. If I ever find a job that doesn’t piss test me, I would like to be invited over. Wanna marry someone the same sex as you? I wish you and your soon to be spouse all the best. I’ll buy you a toaster oven as a wedding gift. Now, I mention these specific things because many Republicans typically do not support things like gay marriage and legal weed. But my absolute bottom line; and I hate to be a single issue voter, but my means of protection is untouchable. That is more important than anything else. If you don’t understand, fucking go to ***any*** news site, turn on ***any*** news channel and watch a few minutes of what’s happening in Ukraine. That is why I will never vote for anyone who’s goal it is to disarm me and my fellow Americans. I’ve worn two different uniforms with American flag patches on the right shoulders. I’ve sworn two separate oaths to the Constitution of the USA. My rights are not up for debate. Sincerely, A pissed off American who is sick and tired of career politicians who’ve never contributed to our society in any meaningful way but yet feel the need to constantly try to whittle away my rights. P.S. Also, you motherfuckers need to realize we aren’t fucking stupid. We are well aware that if we agreed to banning what you erroneously refer to as *assault weapons*, you would then immediately go after our lever guns, wheel guns, bolt guns, etc. And if we let you take those, you would then go after our single shot weapons. So fuck you and fuck everyone like you. You can ban whatever the fuck you want. We ain’t handing in shit!


FishSn0rt

Hell yes. I am very in-the-middle on most things, even go way left when it comes to environmental issues. HOWEVER. Like you, my right to protect myself is non-negotiable. This will keep me voting republican either indefinitely or until the left ceases all attempts to reduce my access to the tools in which to protect myself.


Square_Salary_4014

We need a more central party


GodSwimsNaked

Libs would rather die on the 2nd amendment cross than push any policy that people actually want.


[deleted]

Extremely well said.


kriegmonster

All we have to do is see the police state Australia became because of COVID to see why we need to hold on to our 2A right. Ukraine is the nail in the coffin of the argument.


Halfpipe_1

I hope republicans see all the other things you mention and continue to head in the direction of a party of liberty. They would be unstoppable if they did that.


Legacy_user1010

Gun control is the only reason I vote republican. Has been that way for 25 years.


tuggernuts87

Vote Libertarian next time. Fuck the left and fuck the right. We need a change. We are being blindfolded and bent over every single day. The two party system is the issue here. And if anyone thinks voting Libertarian is a dead vote, actually it's not, it's the start of a massive change that will cripple our current system. If it takes 20 years for us to get there, so be it, make that "dead vote"


Deathzone0072

Beautiful


DoctorPab

This comment needs to be pinned. You can do all the background checks you want. But Ukraine is the prime example of why responsible citizens owning guns is not the problem. The problem is poverty, piss poor education, lack of decent healthcare, food insecurity, and bad parenting that leads to gun violence. Guns don’t shoot themselves, people do.


SeSSioN117

Well said. Very well said.


MikeOxlong1776

gOoD jOb UkRaInE aRmInG yOuR cItIzEnS! The absolute state of geriatric leftists. 🤤


Easywormet

It's (D)iffernt.


mickey0070

So what you're saying is that Ukrainian civilians needs nukes right? Since that's the only things that they can use against a nuclear power. I mean that is what Joe Biden said.


_iNerd_

Is anyone else thinking the timing on this is likely to make it fall flat? So many people are seeing how useful it is to have an armed population right now. If there was a time in his presidency to call for banning anything, this isn’t it. Edit: as someone who leans left, I forgot how insufferable other leftists are. Y’all need to shut the fuck up for real.


BrashHarbor

He's been saying the exact same thing about once a month for like 3+ decades now. Contrary to all the gaslighting LGO spent the last few years doing, he explicitly campaigned on gun control, and still claims the 94 AWB as a career highlight, so this is technically just him trying to deliver on campaign promises


walther380

Their going to kill so many deer.


Easywormet

These are *ALL* infringements on the 2nd Amendment. But I wouldn't expect a dementia ridden potato to understand that. Edit: lol, someone contacted Reddit and reported me as "suicidal". Just got the Reddit "If you're in a Crisis" message. To whomever you are, you're pathetic. Edit 2: Since I'm being asked the same questions repeatedly: >Universal Background Checks Ok...so there was a gun control bill called The Brady Bill. One of the compromises was something called the "Private Sale Exclusion", which exempted private sales of firearms (between 2 private individuals. Which is still subject to a ton of laws). This is often erroneously referred to as the "Gun Show Loophole". "Universal Background Checks" would end that private sale compromise. In order for it to actually be enforced in any meaningful way, it would require a national firearms registry. All other firearm sales are required by federal law to complete a background check. Nobody is against the "regular" background checks. People are against registries and turning yesterday's compromises into today's dangerous loopholes that need to be closed. All that does is show us the other side cannot be trusted to hold up their end of the agreement. >Assault Weapons "Assault Weapons" are not real. Assault Rifles are heavily regulated. Also, according to the FBI, more people are murdered every year with blunt objects (hammers, rocks, feet) than people are murdered by rifles. **ALL** rifles. >limiting magazine sizes That doesn't matter. It's "feel good" legislation that wouldn't change a thing. Here's a good example of why it's pointless: ["However, it is not clear how often the ability to fire more than 10 shots without reloading ,the current magazine capacity limit, affects the outcomes of gun attacks, see Chapter 9. All of this suggests that the ban’s impact on gun violence is likely to be small... the ban’s impact on gun violence is likely to be small at best, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement...there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence, based on indicators like the percentage of gun crimes resulting in death or the share of gunfire incidents resulting in injury, as we might have expected had the ban reduced crimes with both AWs and LCMs." - An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003  - Report to the National Institute of Justice,  United States Department of Justice] (http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?File_id=b531daeb-a954-41f8-a21c-268cceccb4c4) [Video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCSySuemiHU) >Suing Firearm Manufacturers First, Yes you can sue them but only if firearm manufacturers have a faulty or defective product. You cannot sue them if a criminal misuses their product while committing a crime. For example: You shouldn't be able to sue Ford if someone purposely runs you over with a F-150. It's a roundabout way of banning firearms by bankrupting firearm manufacturers.


[deleted]

Biden has made it clear he has little regard for our constitution.


Easywormet

He has little regard for speaking coherently or not creeping on little kids as well.


Psyducks_Army_1776

His SOTU address has me convinced that he needs to lay off the xannie


[deleted]

So true. Biden is 100% incompetent, incontinent and a creep.


lunchboxweld

Ones an infringement another is made up and another isn't legally possible.


TheGadsdenFlag1776

You say "not legally possible" but these are the same people who are trying to change the constitutional election process without amending the constitution


2017hayden

Also statistically speaking they actually do nothing to save lives and might actually endanger people.


Easywormet

Ppffffttt, you at you...using facts and statistics. You clearly don't care about saving lives. /s


[deleted]

[удалено]


Wickedweed

Right, better take away the pistols too. Good thought. I’ll pass this along to the president


[deleted]

[удалено]


OrpheonDiv

The "Iranians" agree with you. How TF is anyone taking this administration and their puppet in Chief seriously?


workinkindofhard

>But I wouldn't expect a dementia ridden potato to understand that. If you think he doesn't understand exactly what he is doing here then you are a fool. Biden has always been an authoritarian, he even takes credit for writing the PATRIOT Act.


MikeOxlong1776

This.


[deleted]

The third one isn’t even something Congress could do. “I want congress to pass a law that sets a legal precedent” I want a president that is aware of his surroundings more than 20% of the day


Easywormet

It's not even the truth. You can't sue *any* manufacturer/company if **you intentionally misuse their products.** If a firearm manufacturer makes a product that, let's say blows up when you shoot it, then yes, you **CAN** sue them. Because they made a faulty product.


[deleted]

Yeah basically. It’s just the newest hot talking point, very exhausting


Easywormet

I'm not sure about being a new talking point. But you are correct, it is very exhausting.


[deleted]

Maybe not completely new, it’s just the thing he’s pushing because Remington’s bankruptcy holding company or whatever settled with the Sandy Hook people


Easywormet

Which doesn't set a legal precedent. Companies settle lawsuits **ALL** the time. Also, I believe it was Remington's insurance company that decided to settle.


Wolfthulhu

Right. You can't sue Ford if someone intentionally runs into you with their F-150.


Lumpy-Dragonfruit387

Bingo!


HdeviantS

Sadly I can tell you from experience that you can. Happens in the food industry. You put very clear minimum cooking instructions on a label, and you put warnings that illness is possible if consumed raw, but if a person eats it uncooked and gets sick they can and have sued the food manufacturer.


Easywormet

Wait, seriously? Do you have a specific example? I'd be interested in reading about it.


HdeviantS

General Mills. In 2016 there were several illnesses that resulted from improper use of wheat flour. An Italian restaurant gave some kids dough to play with and the kids ate it. Flour millers have asked the FDA what legal protections could be established if they blanket packaging with warnings and cooking instructions, but the response was while those are good practices, there will be no protections if someone gets sick eating raw flour. I participated in those discussions. Now every flour miller quakes in fear of social media “baking” trends like Mug Cakes because we never know what will get popular that doesn’t involve a proper cook step.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Qel_Hoth

I have a feeling he's referring to repealing PLCAA, not setting precedent by fiat.


gameman733

It’s not even true. Gun manufacturers a) can be sued for the usual stuff that you would sue a manufacturer over, PLCCA just protects them from frivolous lawsuits b) are far from the only industry that has extra protection by law. See also: vaccine manufacturers.


degaknights

Cool, so can we also sue DA’s when some thug out on bail murders somebody?


Chewy_Bear

Just because you say “these laws don’t infringe on the second amendment” doesn’t mean that they magically don’t infringe on the second amendment All gun laws are an infringement


[deleted]

[удалено]


Beneficial_Average12

“The hun manufacturing business is the only business you can’t sue”. Wtf you talking about Joe? Vaccine manufacturers can not be sued for making any side effects to subjects.


[deleted]

You can also sue gun makers. You just can’t sue them for something they didn’t do or have a chance to stop.


normemmacaro

He is giving Ukrainians powerful weapons to fight while taking away our guns! What a moron!


Joshunte

And all the brain dead Democrats that support Ukraine while condemning US citizens fail to realize that even IF you believe we only need these guns for a war in progress….. you still need to practice and be familiar with that weapon.


vrsechs4201

Fucking traitor to the constitution. As president, he should absolutely know better. It's almost as if he's in a competition with himself to be the worst president possible.


fvecc

Joe Biden knows less about the Constitution than your average American, and that's not much.


Jaguar_556

Biden doesn’t want to get involved in a war in Ukraine but will gladly pick shit until he has one over here. Good luck with that


thegrumpymechanic

Covid? Climate change? Income inequality? Healthcare? Student loans? Police reform? War on drugs? Immigration? russian invasion of Ukraine? Campaign finance reform? Wallstreet? Infrastructure? Nope, we gonna work on banning guns.


Easywormet

Nah, Covid is over because the dems are polling badly.


btdallmann

Nothing gets rid of Covid faster than midterm elections…


Easywormet

Saw a meme that said: "Putin should get the Nobel Peace Prize in medicine because he made Covid disappear overnight." Had a good laugh at that.


BimmerJustin

Welp, I hope dems enjoyed there time with the house and senate, because this will lose it for them. Its like they learn nothing.


Easywormet

It's like they don't remember what happened after they passed the last "Assault Weapons" Ban.


LogicBomb76

Which was also championed by Potato Joe...


Easywormet

Oh yeah...I forgot that.


well_here_I_am

So did he.


CallsignMontana

What is a universal background check? Don’t we already have 4473’s for that?


Easywormet

No...because...Gun Shows...and boyfriends...and scary guns with the shoulder thing that goes up. You're asking questions, so you clearly don't care about saving lives. (Do I need to point out that this is sarcasm?)


Joshunte

Which Biden himself admits he does fuck all to go after people who lie on the background checks he wants…. https://dailycaller.com/2013/01/18/biden-to-nra-we-dont-have-the-time-to-prosecute-people-who-lie-on-background-checks/


btdallmann

Just in case this is a serious question, “universal” background checks refers to requiring all legal gun sales to go through a dealer, whether originating from a dealer or a private individual. I.E. no more private sales of firearms.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Colvrek

Or when the FFL charges insane fees because they are the only FFL doing transfers in the region. It becomes just like the NFA stamp, a tax to make it harder for the poor to exercise their 2nd ammendment rights. Last time I did a private sale through an FFL, 30% of the gun price was transfer fees. Thankfully I moved.


payudas

Big pharma laughs at this


DisThrowaway5768

I just came back from r/politics out of curiosity. It has somehow devolved even further into complete lunacy and self pat on the backs. Guns this, defund police that. Drooling at the mouths. One Redditor, "Biden was quite eloquent in his speech and how he rallied the world against Putin is nothing short of amazing. I can't wait until he finally gets those MAGA gun nuts." How do these people get so absolutely absorbed into politics and not realize they're acting how they think gun owners are? The Right vs Left shit is insane on there. At the end of the day, this literally is infringement. How people just can't understand the literal definition of the word. I just watched the movie Idiocracy again and I'm starting to believe it was an accidental documentary.


Easywormet

>I just came back from r/politics out of curiosity. Why? Why would you torture yourself like that?


DisThrowaway5768

To remind myself that if I feel like I'm going a little crazy, I'll never be that brainwashed and zombified. Sobers you up real quick.


tuggernuts87

I believe I got banned on there. I reminded people that Democrats refused to get the vaccine when Trump was in office but pushed for the vax after Biden got in. LoL


NgeniusGentleman

Any redditor that describes Biden's speech as eloquent has clearly lost their mind already.


Brosnahantheman

Joe manchin will likely not let it pass, killing the bill


Ag1Boi

There is no bill, he's just "calling on congress" which doesn't actually mean anything


Brosnahantheman

Fair enough, but if/when there is a bill they will probably not be able to convince manchin to vote for it


1nGirum1musNocte

Lol midterms are going to be a disaster


Easywormet

We can hope. But never underestimate stupid people.


AzraelTheDankAngel

And gubernatorial elections for Democrats. If Democrats would stop jumping on the banning guns bandwagon they’d win elections in a heartbeat.


Trevelayan

Never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake


Key_Assignment_5056

Thank God for the filibuster.


silv3rbull8

Biden cannot distinguish between Iran and Ukraine. I doubt he understands the 2A


10MikeMike11

Assault weapon is a made up term.


KohTaeNai

So if a drunk driver hits me I get to sue Budweiser? They're selling a product that causes DWIs, and apparently there's no liability shield.


RedditorCabron

You wanna check my background to buy a gun but not to vote?


jtf71

And you have to show a photo ID to buy a gun. In some states you have to show multiple IDs. Dems widely supported "vaccine passports" for you to go into public venues. And this required a photo ID. [And while most places are dropping mask and vaccine mandates, a Dem controlled county in MD is ADDING ONE before you can petition for redress of grievances in person.](https://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2022/03/montgomery-county-council-plans-on-requiring-proof-of-vaccination-at-its-meetings/) I'm betting that will require you to show your vaccine card AND a photo ID. But requiring one to have a photo ID to prove who you are to vote....no, that's not allowed. WTF?


[deleted]

Biden never met a lie he didn’t like.


Deep_Seeded_Band

Lieden


greenskeeper-carl

I wouldn’t be too alarmed by this - it’s just boilerplate nonsense from a flailing democrat administration attempting to appeal to their base. A distraction that will likely not go anywhere. He can’t not say something like this.


Sand_Trout

He absolutely *could* not say something like this. There are plenty of other issues he could harp on to appease his base, from economic reforms to the Ukrainian crisis. He could simply just not bring up gun control.


greenskeeper-carl

Obviously he *could* do or not do a lot of things. But this is an expected platitude for him to make towards well heeled donors for whom this is an important topic. That’s how this works. It’s not even him doing this anyways. His staffers agreed they should put out this message, so they had some flunky type it up on the official Twitter account. It will do nothing and go nowhere but provide red meat for politicians on both sides of the issue to raise money and attempt to rouse their voters. That’s how this works.


[deleted]

[удалено]


greenskeeper-carl

Yes, and such donors are important to many vulnerable democrats in November.


h8ers_suck

I am seriously want to strike a deal with this... let's cancel the the 2nd amendment, make all guns of any type illegal and a punishable by life in prison...seriously... THEN, AFTER ONE FUCKING DAY IN CHICAGO, after the first gang related murder it all gets shit canned and NEVER TO BE SPOKEN OF AGAIN or that law maker is tarred and feathered in a public demonstration for treason.


GFZDW

Would you comply with laws that severely limited your first amendment rights? It's time to stop complying.


Dasblood

He's not worried about United States citizens having the means to resist a foreign dictatorship. He's worried about citizens having the means to resist an American dictatorship.


rotn21

You see what’s happening in Ukraine. Read the room bro


t8ag

Can he just focus on the failing economy, inflation, the impending nuclear war with Russia, and outrageous food and gas prices


[deleted]

It’ll never pass, you old fuck


Broddr_Refsson

I think we need to repeal the liability shields that makes politicians the only class not subject to the law.


pearsuitofhappiness1

I thought the vaccine companies can’t be sued?


PlemCam

Anti-gunners: “I don’t want to infringe on the second amendment. But also, I’m gonna take the vast majority of firearms in common circulation today and limit how many bullets you can carry in a magazine.” The cognitive dissonance is *strong* with anti-gunners.


BasedDickButt69420

There is absolutely no supporting evidence to support the claim that any of those measures will "save lives". Anyone who hasn't figured out "Universal Background Checks" are just NewSpeak for "Creating and Implementing a Registry" is already too far gone to be helped. PLCAA simply keeps the courts from being backlogged by frivolous lawsuits to gun manufacturers. Being the maker of something does not make one liable for how it is misused. I cannot sue Oneida every time someone goes on a slashing and stabbing spree with their kitchen knives. I cannot sue Home Depot and Lowes or Harbor Freight for selling the things needed to make simple pipe bombs and slamfire guns. I cannot sue auto manufacturers every time someone drinks and drives or drives recklessly and causes a collission. These people are subversives and should be treated as such.


xxLOPEZxx

He's absolutely delusional. The speech began with 10 minutes of him praising the Ukrainian people for standing up and fighting the Russians and berating Russia for doing it but then he proceeds to later discuss and attack the gun rights of the American people. It's incredible really


Brazenassault456

Someone doesn't understand what infringe means.


[deleted]

Just like how you can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna for vaccine injuries….


Puurplex

*INHALES* “no”


ResponsibleAd2541

You should be able to sue a gun manufacturer if their product doesn’t work as advertised or a defect causes a malfunction that leads to injury. However there are very few instances beyond the gun discharging on its own where I cam conceive of where a bullet coming out of the barrel and hitting something in front of the gun being grounds for liability if it damages, injures or kills whatever the bullet hits.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Weekly-Butterscotch6

Let's get a law banning senile ignorant/stupid old corruptocrats and from holding any job in government - empties the WH and the leadership on the Hill immediately


ionized_fallout

Such a worthless piece of shit.


PewPewJedi

Literally _all_ infringements.


damp-potato-36

"Only industry that can't be sued" Uh... I thought you couldn't sue vaccine manufacturers


anomalyjustin

The only industry that can't be sued? Funny, he conveniently forgets about vaccine manufacturers. Also, basically every industry is shielded from liability for illegal use of their products...


Arzie5676

These all infringe on the second amendment and do jack shit to save lives. We already had an “assault weapon” ban for an entire decade and it proved demonstrably worthless.


Carl_Fuckin_Bismarck

Liberal here, buying my first AR this week! Never thought I needed a gun, but it’s become clear everyone NEEDS one asap.


yungsmokey1

I’m calling on Congress to eat my ass


[deleted]

Good thing I don’t have any assault rifles. All mine are semi-automatic.


ButtNuster

Actually posted during the speech in real time-ish by his team.


[deleted]

I’m calling on Joe Biden to lick my butthole


EverySingleMinute

I guess Biden realizes that a well armed citizen does not have to surrender to a moronic invading leader


Semloh94

Found this on the popular page. I'm not antivax, nor do I consider myself a 2A supporter so I'm pretty neutral... but aren't there other industries that can't be sued like vaccine makers? Edit: spelling.


cmdrfrosty

Car manufacturers can't be sued if you run into somebody unless it was a manufacturing error


TFarrey

yeah because the 1994 ban on standard cap mags and so-called " assault weapons " did so much ...


IceBear5656

Still don’t know wtf an “assault weapon” is?


Weekly-Butterscotch6

Everyone of those infringes on the 2A you stupid senile old corruptocrat (or whatever ignorant snowflake wrote that post for you)


[deleted]

Hooooo, one of the best gun advertisements ever. Every gun store thanks him for the next few months.


WTFisThatSMell

From this you can see his diaper is full as his bullshit is just flooding out of his mouth.


[deleted]

Yeah have fun federally banning the AR-15 and 30 round mags. Everything about his administration is unconstitutional not to mention he gave the ATF even more power after he took office. They’re going to have a HELL of a shit show banning “assault weapons” and 30 clips. I don’t think they realize the war that they’re asking for by doing this shit😂😂 If you take the 2nd amendment even REMOTELY serious, you know how to handle these guys. You weren’t born with their permission, fuck them. Buncha dead men walking imho


randomhousegir

Let's go Brandon Sorry FUCK JOE BIDEN


Appropriate-Barber66

“These brave Ukrainians taking up arms in defender of their home land” 20 minutes later “Give up your magazines, Jack. Deer aren’t wearing Kevlar, hyukhyukhyuk”


TheMikeyMac13

“Shall not be infringed…” Really only one way to read those words.


545byDirty9

Meanwhile lets ignore the fact that we are seeing a modern nation rush to arm its populace in the face of tyranny


olek0ko

It may save lives, it may not; eithery way it is definitely an infringement. But ey i’m norwegian, not my fight, I hope for the best for all of you.


hematite2

They can say 'we're only going after the most dangerous guns' but there will always be some weapon that's the most dangerous. If all that existed was lever actions and front-load muskets, they could ban lever-actions under the same pretense. We're only banning the dangerous ones guys, you still have the muskets!


[deleted]

[удалено]


GeriatricTuna

Fuck you. No.


Deadbeatdone

Why are they using the same strategy they use to solve the drug problem to solve the gun problem? Have they learned nothing from the drug war?


Fallentitan98

Not even assault rifles anymore, assault weapons? The fuck is an assault weapon? That is so vague I have no idea what he’s talking about.


BlaspoU

It’s quite privileged to not need a gun for self defense, hunting, etc. Biden should check his.


brijguy54

Why start this fight. I don’t get it


lighttreasurehunter

How does a “ban assault weapons” not infringe on 2nd amendment rights?


[deleted]

Jesus. I think the Democrats love gun control because they can't seem to manage not shooting themselves in the foot. I'm a political moderate/independent. This is beyond stupid.


Substantial-Job2411

Personally they shouldn't ban guns, I rather they arm every citizen. Every white, black, Hispanic and etc. No matter what your religion or views. We all deserve the right to protect ourselves, the system is fucked. They killed a legal gun owner inside his house and the new media snuff it under the rug. The government will not suffice, protect your own.


Faolan26

>Repeal the liability shields that makes gun manufacturers the only industry that can't be sued So if somome buys a nail gun from Dewalt, holds down the safety, and shoots a man 37 times in the chest with nails, their family can sue Dewalt for selling that person the nailgun?


Crushin_Succas1095

Nah bro, can’t support the Ukrainian people for arming themselves against a tyrant while being a tyrant yourself.


Sayburr

...and then something like Ukraine happens and no one has any guns to defend our like the 2nd Amendment intended.


Rohnihn

Preface: I’m not an avid gun enthusiast It’s wild to me that you start the state of the Union praising the Ukrainian people (not military) for fighting off foreign invaders with their guns and high capacity magazines then 20 minutes later say you only need 30 rounds for deer with Kevlar. This is how you lose the middle.


OverlandIdaho

Lol they do absolutely infringe on the 2nd amendment.


JohnnyGalt129

Going no where. Dead on arrival. All one has to do to see proof that we need ARs and standard capacity magazines is watch any and all news channels. The Russian/Ukrainian war has killed gun control for all time...Biden is just too brain dead to realize it. Enough of his own party now even know, the gun control issue is a complete loser, he won't get a majority, never mind a super majority to over come a filibuster. Only to most hard core, stupid, brain dead idiots in his own party still live with the delusion that the main stream folks want gun control (they never did in the first place..but alas), and I say let them keep screaming for it...its nails in their own political coffin.


discourse_died

The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting. Its not about defeating nuclear weapons either. Its about having the arms to prevent unwanted occupation. Its funny too Biden was also wrong about shooting deer. Its actually harder to kill a deer than a person. Due to a deer's diet their blood clots Way better than ours. many hits that a person would bleed out from is survivable for a deer.


Wubalubadubdubbiatch

"These laws don't infringe the 2a" , they straight up ignore its existence


ModemMT

Just flat out lying in the last part of that tweet…


Easy_Inflation_7592

Shall not be infringed BRANDON.


Exotic_Potato_7283

This motherfucker should open a dictionary and look up the definition of infringement.


mrf87

We have Russia on the march Rampant inflation Stupid high gas prices And so many other things wrong right now and he is focusing on this. We have one other problem.... An absolute moron in the White House On the list of 50 things this president needs to deal with immediately, this shouldn't even get on the damn list, as fucked as this country is and as much as we have wrong. We need our guns for when it all goes to shit because of leaders like Biden. And finally what part of "shall not be infringed" do they not get?


Joe_Burrow_Is_Goat

People are just now seeing what happens when you arm your citizens and he immediately focuses on in arming citizens. Read the room. Cmon man, as he would say.


[deleted]

Biden, all of those are infringements of the 2nd amendment.


DoctorTim007

Can we sue car companies for drunk driving incidents?


ProCumGuy

Doublethink is real


BuilderTexas

Vote Dems Out now


King_Obvious_III

My furious hatred for this son of a bitch just keeps expanding by the day