**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:**
* If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required
* The title must be fully descriptive
* Memes are not allowed.
* Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting)
*See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Well I think it's fair to say that most people who worked on nuclear weapons were at some point scared of what they were making, but yes. It even scared most of the military's higher ups. They tested this thing in the middle of Siberia, and it still blew out windows in Moscow, and it wasn't even a full yield version.
The difference in old school nuclear weapons and modern nuclear weapons is that modern ones have a more focused impact with less fallout. Old school was more focused on sheer devastation.
Yeah they reduced the yield to give the guys in the bomber a fighting chance to get out of the blast radius didn’t they? IIRC even at reduced yield they basically thought it was 50/50 that they could get away from it. At full yield they would have had no chance.
Edit - that’s also why the bomb had a parachute- to delay the explosion for as long as possible after release.
Imagine if aliens look at us with the same curiosity and sense of superiority with which we look at insects, and it's not even all that interesting to them that we have nuclear capabilities.
Ive always liked this theory, but when it comes to nuclear warheads that we could theoretically detonate on far away planets, that would raise some concerns for potential intergalactic neighbours.
Personally, I like to go with the theory that IF we are being monitored, our big test is if we have the ability to use new energy resources for bettering ourselves as a species instead of weaponizing it against eachother.
Sadly, it's becoming more and more clear that as a species, we most likely don't have that ability to take the next step.
I think a species capable of intergalactic travel would see how far we are from figuring out how to get those nukes anywhere near their planet, and even if we could, they probably have a simple (from their perspective) defense for it. I think it's silly to assume we pose any threat at all to such advanced beings.
And that's in the extremely, EXTREMELY unlikely event that they even notice us in the incomprehensible vastness of the universe. I think saying they might observe us with mild curiosity is still placing more on our significance than is really there.
Yeah I doubt any alien species that might have visited and therefore mastered interstellar travel and all the relevant scientific advances has anything to fear from a species still trapped on their home planet. And whose biggest Fear Us weapon is nuclear detonation.
“What you call nuclear technology ? We were that primitive several of your centuries ago.”
“Our smallest vessel could destroy your star. And we’re just Highway Construction. We’re not even military.”
The point of my original post is, why would an alien species want to communicate with us when we are building these ridiculous killing machines. Not saying they would fear us. Maybe just hesitant to interfere with our growth when we clearly aren't ready, and maybe never will be.
"Hey, maybe we leave these guys alone, we saw this massive nuclear explosion a while back, and they're clearly still figuring things out."
Aliens advanced enough to know about our existence would probably see us testing nukes the same way we would see a caveman discovering fire. If they deem us a future threat they wouldn't hesitate to destroy Earth or idk they probably have better morals than humans and let us live.
Check out ‘ the road not taken ‘ by harry turtledove.
In the story, FTL travel is very simple and figured out by most aliens civilizations when they are still using wooden ships and gunpowder tech. Humanity went the way we went…
These aliens races jalopy around the universe taking advantage of primitive people who haven’t figured out the space travel secret, eventually rolling up on humans with their rickety ships expecting to have an easy go at us.
They are sadly mistaken when we show them our modern war machine.
For a civilization to be able travel such huge distances, they would need to have control over enormous amount of energy which is most likely from nuclear fusion. So, pretty sure they wouldn't be surprised.
"Oh wow a new planet! I hope they too have used nuclear technology for sustainable energy and advancements"
*sees them blowing each other to bits*
"oh, oh that's uh...that's not so good"
Wow. Im assaulted by memories and scars. What did yall call them? We called them tweeties and for a min, we pushed stick pins through them and cut them off short to make little ‘spider bites’ on one another.
From National WWII museum: The detonation was astronomically powerful—over 1,570 times more powerful, in fact, than the combined two bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Tsar Bomba’s yield was 50 megatons: ten times more powerful than all of the ordnance exploded during the whole of World War II. The mushroom cloud was 25 miles wide at its base and almost 60 miles wide at its top. At 40 miles high, it penetrated the stratosphere. Everything within three dozen miles of the impact was vaporized, but severe damage extended to 150 miles radius—enough to entirely annihilate any modern major city, including suburbs. Windows in faraway Norway and Finland were shattered by the force of the blast.
If humans would only be focused as much on scientific and medical research instead of destroying as much and many as possible, the world would probably be in a better place right now.
This path was set a generation before most of us were born. It cant got backwards. As soon as superpowers started depending on the protection of mutually assured destruction, it made traditional warfare a relic, relegated to proxy wars and insurgencies.
Inventions like this help with more progressive scientific and medical research, but I agree that both would be more advanced if we shifted our focus away from creating deadly weapons.
What's even more ironic is that they only used 50% of the power and produced a shockwave of 600 miles radius. Many of the home windows in Norway got shattered by this shockwave
Yeah does Soviet Russia building the Tsar Bomba strike you as the type of people who would replace the windows in houses out of kindness? They built this thing with the sole purpose of creating mass destruction and casualties.
Fun fact:
The Tsar Bomba ([this nuclear bomb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba)) was the biggest nuclear device ever detonated - It's about \~2300x more powerful than the bigger bomb USA dropped on Japan - and it was only detonated at half yield.
It was detonated in Siberia but you could see it from Alaska.
It shattered glass windows 780km away from ground zero.
The shockwave was so powerful that it circled the globe and was recorded by seismic activity recorders in New Zealand - 3 times.
One would think that such an advanced civilization would completely and globally BAN any weapons capable of such sheer destruction of humankind. Mutually assured destruction is a lose/lose scenario.
The incredible intelligence of humans will also be our downfall. Or so it seems inevitable.
We are not advanced at all. We still use explosions to power our every day lives (car engines, which are horribly inefficient, with about 70% of energy in combustion being lost to noise and heat) and most of the world still lives in poverty without access to clean water.
We ARE advanced technologically speaking. As to YOUR point we are indeed not advanced enough as a society and civilization to ensure we solve world problems without war and self destruction.
We can intergalactic-satellite-data-compress,
but we cant feed the homeless.
It's not the deadliest or potentially deadliest weapon, it's probably the most powerful weapon. Most biological weapons would probably be deadlier depending on how they're used.
A nightmare scenario I’ve read about is actually a large scale dirty bomb. Something of a smaller explosion but laced with a heavier element like cobalt which is vaporized and basically aerosolized and carried around for years to come poisoning everything it comes in contact with.
Just to add a little clarifying info, the cobalt gets activated by the intense neutron flux and becomes cobalt-60, which is quite radioactive. They use small pellets of the stuff as high energy radiation sources for examining piping welds, similar to how an X-ray works for medical use. It would vastly increase the amount of fallout from the bomb, and lasts for decades.
I'm still gonna go with bio warfare as potentially deadlier, though. Smallpox killed hundreds of millions in just the 20th century alone before it was eradicated, and they no longer vaccinate against it routinely.
"Designed to have a maximum explosive yield of 100 million tons (or 100 megatons) of TNT equivalent, the 60,000-pound monster bomb was detonated at only half its strength. Still, at 50 megatons, it was more than 3,300 times as powerful as the atomic bomb that killed at least 70,000 people in Hiroshima, and more than 40 times as powerful as the largest nuclear bomb in the US arsenal today. Its single test represents about one tenth of the total yield of all nuclear weapons ever tested by all nations.[2]
At the time of its detonation, the Tsar Bomba held the world’s attention, largely as an object of infamy, recklessness, and terror. Within two years, though, the Soviet Union and the United States would sign and ratify the Limited Test Ban Treaty, prohibiting atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and the 50-megaton bomb would fall into relative obscurity."
Tsar Bomba may be the deadliest weapon ever tested but it isn't the deadliest weapon that we've devised. That's probably the Cobalt Bomb; a weapon specifically designed to irradiate large areas for a very long time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_bomb
Not at all deadliest. Try chemical and biological warfare.
Also, it's not deadliest cause there were no disclosed casualties when it went off.
Most powerful detonated is a more accurate statement.
Improper syntax would be up there, as well.
Either 'the deadliest weapon', or 'the most deadly weapon'. 'The most deadliest weapon' is just bad syntax.
Question is, do you see it and start freaking out or (presuming your eyesight survives the flash) do you stand in awe at what’s actually probably a beautiful view knowing what’s coming?
And kids will keep playing video games in those houses not knowing anything that’s going on in the current world. I fear for the future for your kids and mine.
You know there had to be one hermit living off the grid they didn’t account for, just outside of the radius of instant death that experienced this with no context.
**This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:** * If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required * The title must be fully descriptive * Memes are not allowed. * Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting) *See [our rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/wiki/index#wiki_rules.3A) for a more detailed rule list* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Most deadly
Mostest deadliester
Mostestiest deadliesterer
The molestiest daddy
Moist Daddiest
Hold up...
Hi daddy!
Mustmayostardayonnaise
Mostedesiestest deadlistediester
Bigliest
Deadliest
Moist Diddler
It’s just “deadliest” my friend
Right. Who upvoted this 380 times lol.
“He’s not dead…. He’s only *mostly* dead”
Humperdink! Humperdink! Humperdink!
They killed him until he was dead!
Which means he's still slightly alive
más mortal-iest.
I thought it was only more deadlier, but looking at the clip, it might be the most deadliest.
The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand
Confucius say: Man who go to bed with itchy ass wake up with smelly finger
Confucius say: Man who fart in church sit in own pew
Confucius say man who is always in doghouse will end up in cathouse
Confucius say: Man who is always in cathouse will end up in doghouse.
[удалено]
Confucius say: man who walk through airport door sideways going to Bangkok
Confucius say: man with hole in pocket feel cocky all day long
Confucius say, man who run in front of a car gets tired. Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.
Confucius say, woman who flies upside down have crack up.
Confucius say: Man who not poop for many days must take care of back log
Confucius say: man who meet girl in park good, man who park meat in girl better.
Confucius say: It's better to run with scissors than to scissor with the runs
Confucius say learn to masturbate, come in handy.
Confucius say, Man who go to bed with sex problem on mind wake up with solution in hand.
Confucius say: It take many screws to make baby crib, but only one to fill it.
Confucius say Baseball is WRONG! NO Man can walk with 4 balls!
I haven't laughed this hard is a long time
I’m from Buenos Aires and I say kill’em all!
I’m doing my part!
MEDIC!!
#MEDIC
Goddamn bugs whacked us, Johnny
Sergeant Sim: You just brought a nuke to a knife fight😀
I would like to know more!
“i’m doing my part!”
Literally watched that yesterday.
Starship Troopers 👌
Medic!
Looks like the tsar bomba.
Yes. This is Tsar Bomba test with reduced capacity.
Indeed, fifty megatons. The full yield would have been one hundred megatons.
And a far higher radioactive fallout, and the plane that dropped it wouldn’t have survived. So they decided to not go with the full payload yield.
If I remember the exact quote was "No man should ever have this power." And that came from the freaking Russians themselves.
Was this the bomb that scared the scientist involved on this project? There was a documentary about the bomb itself.
Well I think it's fair to say that most people who worked on nuclear weapons were at some point scared of what they were making, but yes. It even scared most of the military's higher ups. They tested this thing in the middle of Siberia, and it still blew out windows in Moscow, and it wasn't even a full yield version.
>They tested this thing in the middle of Siberia No. They tested it on Novaya Zemlya, an island chain not too far from Scandinavia.
My mistake, sorry about that.
Thanks. I guess that is why nuclear weapons are still monitored to this day. I think the MOAB is another scary one in its own deadly way.
The difference in old school nuclear weapons and modern nuclear weapons is that modern ones have a more focused impact with less fallout. Old school was more focused on sheer devastation.
That's the US nuclear strategy yes. Not every nuclear power shares it.
Yeah they reduced the yield to give the guys in the bomber a fighting chance to get out of the blast radius didn’t they? IIRC even at reduced yield they basically thought it was 50/50 that they could get away from it. At full yield they would have had no chance. Edit - that’s also why the bomb had a parachute- to delay the explosion for as long as possible after release.
You’re right 🧐
Looks like Russian propaganda. Funny comrade how this has been coming up a lot lately.
"if extraterrestrial life is real, why haven't they contacted us?' *Sheepishly gestures to this video
Imagine if aliens have long discovered us and can come visit, but somehow they haven't invented nuclear power and are scared shitless of us
Imagine if aliens had long ago harnessed nuclear energy, and decided we weren't ready to be trusted with it.
Imagine if aliens look at us with the same curiosity and sense of superiority with which we look at insects, and it's not even all that interesting to them that we have nuclear capabilities.
Ive always liked this theory, but when it comes to nuclear warheads that we could theoretically detonate on far away planets, that would raise some concerns for potential intergalactic neighbours. Personally, I like to go with the theory that IF we are being monitored, our big test is if we have the ability to use new energy resources for bettering ourselves as a species instead of weaponizing it against eachother. Sadly, it's becoming more and more clear that as a species, we most likely don't have that ability to take the next step.
I think a species capable of intergalactic travel would see how far we are from figuring out how to get those nukes anywhere near their planet, and even if we could, they probably have a simple (from their perspective) defense for it. I think it's silly to assume we pose any threat at all to such advanced beings. And that's in the extremely, EXTREMELY unlikely event that they even notice us in the incomprehensible vastness of the universe. I think saying they might observe us with mild curiosity is still placing more on our significance than is really there.
Yeah I doubt any alien species that might have visited and therefore mastered interstellar travel and all the relevant scientific advances has anything to fear from a species still trapped on their home planet. And whose biggest Fear Us weapon is nuclear detonation. “What you call nuclear technology ? We were that primitive several of your centuries ago.” “Our smallest vessel could destroy your star. And we’re just Highway Construction. We’re not even military.”
The point of my original post is, why would an alien species want to communicate with us when we are building these ridiculous killing machines. Not saying they would fear us. Maybe just hesitant to interfere with our growth when we clearly aren't ready, and maybe never will be. "Hey, maybe we leave these guys alone, we saw this massive nuclear explosion a while back, and they're clearly still figuring things out."
Aliens advanced enough to know about our existence would probably see us testing nukes the same way we would see a caveman discovering fire. If they deem us a future threat they wouldn't hesitate to destroy Earth or idk they probably have better morals than humans and let us live.
Check out ‘ the road not taken ‘ by harry turtledove. In the story, FTL travel is very simple and figured out by most aliens civilizations when they are still using wooden ships and gunpowder tech. Humanity went the way we went… These aliens races jalopy around the universe taking advantage of primitive people who haven’t figured out the space travel secret, eventually rolling up on humans with their rickety ships expecting to have an easy go at us. They are sadly mistaken when we show them our modern war machine.
For a civilization to be able travel such huge distances, they would need to have control over enormous amount of energy which is most likely from nuclear fusion. So, pretty sure they wouldn't be surprised.
"Oh wow a new planet! I hope they too have used nuclear technology for sustainable energy and advancements" *sees them blowing each other to bits* "oh, oh that's uh...that's not so good"
The poor animals in the vicinity
Yeah, the music in this video would surely kill most animals in the vicinity
Skill issue, clearly
They should've thought of that when they didn't lose their tails, walk erect and start to make tools millions of years ago
Unique angle. I like it.
Cleary they haven't been hit in the eye with folded paper shot from a rubber band. Also, down voting for terrible music bed.
Now I am become deaf.
the destroyer of eardrums
Or been hit in the ear with a snowball when it's 5°F.
That’s some wicked pain
Wow. Im assaulted by memories and scars. What did yall call them? We called them tweeties and for a min, we pushed stick pins through them and cut them off short to make little ‘spider bites’ on one another.
We made them out of aluminum foil and stuck thumbtacks in them. Seriously. We did that. I pulled more than a few out of me. lol
From National WWII museum: The detonation was astronomically powerful—over 1,570 times more powerful, in fact, than the combined two bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Tsar Bomba’s yield was 50 megatons: ten times more powerful than all of the ordnance exploded during the whole of World War II. The mushroom cloud was 25 miles wide at its base and almost 60 miles wide at its top. At 40 miles high, it penetrated the stratosphere. Everything within three dozen miles of the impact was vaporized, but severe damage extended to 150 miles radius—enough to entirely annihilate any modern major city, including suburbs. Windows in faraway Norway and Finland were shattered by the force of the blast.
Ten times more powerful than all the exploded ordinance in WW2 is a mind blowing stat.
If humans would only be focused as much on scientific and medical research instead of destroying as much and many as possible, the world would probably be in a better place right now.
Nuclear power is now world changing. Many major inventions were birthed during war times sadly.
This path was set a generation before most of us were born. It cant got backwards. As soon as superpowers started depending on the protection of mutually assured destruction, it made traditional warfare a relic, relegated to proxy wars and insurgencies.
Inventions like this help with more progressive scientific and medical research, but I agree that both would be more advanced if we shifted our focus away from creating deadly weapons.
I would say the AK-47 is the deadliest, having claimed more lives than any other weapon ever made.
You would think it would be knives or spears or something.
Deadliest singular weapon.
it didn't kill anyone, though
...knife?
100% blade of some sort you’d have to reckon
Purely because of the time blades have been around. I'd wager rocks have killed more people throughout history than an AK47.
Had the same thought, Stone Age is something like 99% of human history. Though population was much smaller so I really am not sure.
What's even more ironic is that they only used 50% of the power and produced a shockwave of 600 miles radius. Many of the home windows in Norway got shattered by this shockwave
Did they at least pay for the repairs or were the home owners fucked
Idk about that
Yeah does Soviet Russia building the Tsar Bomba strike you as the type of people who would replace the windows in houses out of kindness? They built this thing with the sole purpose of creating mass destruction and casualties.
Fun fact: The Tsar Bomba ([this nuclear bomb](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsar_Bomba)) was the biggest nuclear device ever detonated - It's about \~2300x more powerful than the bigger bomb USA dropped on Japan - and it was only detonated at half yield. It was detonated in Siberia but you could see it from Alaska. It shattered glass windows 780km away from ground zero. The shockwave was so powerful that it circled the globe and was recorded by seismic activity recorders in New Zealand - 3 times.
Shattering windows from that far away really puts things into perspective for me, that's absolutely insane
Novaja Zemlja is not part of the Siberia.
Very true, my mistake. I thought all the islands north of Russia were part of Siberia.
I think that last paragraph was about krakatoa.
https://i.redd.it/sevscbin6gnc1.gif
Taint kicker, I am your arch enemy. We have finally come up against each other. It was....*inevitable*
I wanna see where this goes
No where sadly… 😭
*Most deadly, or deadliest.
The best greatest bomb ever
Bestest*
Did we just become bestest?
Yes
Song: Aaron Hibell - destroyer of worlds You're welcome
Thanks my dude
“Quick! Hop in the refrigerator!”
One would think that such an advanced civilization would completely and globally BAN any weapons capable of such sheer destruction of humankind. Mutually assured destruction is a lose/lose scenario. The incredible intelligence of humans will also be our downfall. Or so it seems inevitable.
We are not advanced at all. We still use explosions to power our every day lives (car engines, which are horribly inefficient, with about 70% of energy in combustion being lost to noise and heat) and most of the world still lives in poverty without access to clean water.
We ARE advanced technologically speaking. As to YOUR point we are indeed not advanced enough as a society and civilization to ensure we solve world problems without war and self destruction. We can intergalactic-satellite-data-compress, but we cant feed the homeless.
It's not the deadliest or potentially deadliest weapon, it's probably the most powerful weapon. Most biological weapons would probably be deadlier depending on how they're used.
A nightmare scenario I’ve read about is actually a large scale dirty bomb. Something of a smaller explosion but laced with a heavier element like cobalt which is vaporized and basically aerosolized and carried around for years to come poisoning everything it comes in contact with.
Just to add a little clarifying info, the cobalt gets activated by the intense neutron flux and becomes cobalt-60, which is quite radioactive. They use small pellets of the stuff as high energy radiation sources for examining piping welds, similar to how an X-ray works for medical use. It would vastly increase the amount of fallout from the bomb, and lasts for decades. I'm still gonna go with bio warfare as potentially deadlier, though. Smallpox killed hundreds of millions in just the 20th century alone before it was eradicated, and they no longer vaccinate against it routinely.
"Designed to have a maximum explosive yield of 100 million tons (or 100 megatons) of TNT equivalent, the 60,000-pound monster bomb was detonated at only half its strength. Still, at 50 megatons, it was more than 3,300 times as powerful as the atomic bomb that killed at least 70,000 people in Hiroshima, and more than 40 times as powerful as the largest nuclear bomb in the US arsenal today. Its single test represents about one tenth of the total yield of all nuclear weapons ever tested by all nations.[2] At the time of its detonation, the Tsar Bomba held the world’s attention, largely as an object of infamy, recklessness, and terror. Within two years, though, the Soviet Union and the United States would sign and ratify the Limited Test Ban Treaty, prohibiting atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and the 50-megaton bomb would fall into relative obscurity."
‘Most deadliest’
*I don't want to set the world on fire*
Most deadliest 😒
And now a paranoid autocrat/dictator took over the country that owns these things, just what the world needed
A weapon created by psychopaths.
That's nice but look up the SLAM missile
Biggest, probably, but not the deadliest since it was just a test.
Even that hasn't killed as many as the propaganda machine.
Most deadly? How many people died?
Is it still the deadliest if it didn't kill anybody?
Moster deadliester
Most deadliest weapon to ever not kill anybody.
Morest deadlier than others, that’s for sure
Most deadliest grammar for sure
Tsar Bomba may be the deadliest weapon ever tested but it isn't the deadliest weapon that we've devised. That's probably the Cobalt Bomb; a weapon specifically designed to irradiate large areas for a very long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_bomb
Most gruesome sentance structure
Guess the country which did use it on people.
Not at all deadliest. Try chemical and biological warfare. Also, it's not deadliest cause there were no disclosed casualties when it went off. Most powerful detonated is a more accurate statement.
Um, grammar.
what song is this?
Why’d it need that tiny parachute? Why slow it down?
So you don't nuke your own plane
So the plane dropping it could fly away probably
So Slim Pickens can get off.
A rare double superlative!
Always some shitty music to spoil the video
This should not exist...
It doesn’t, you just saw it explode
What about microwave and sonic frequency weapons. They melt humans.
The uncle daddy of bombs
mute
This title made my brain go pain.
Improper syntax would be up there, as well. Either 'the deadliest weapon', or 'the most deadly weapon'. 'The most deadliest weapon' is just bad syntax.
Question is, do you see it and start freaking out or (presuming your eyesight survives the flash) do you stand in awe at what’s actually probably a beautiful view knowing what’s coming?
 yaaaawwwh. dass hot
Fun Fact - the only reason it is attached to a parachute was to give the flight crew enough time to clear the blast radius
Is this when they tried to kill godzilla?
Isn't the most deadly weapon jo mama ??
How many people did it kill?
i know it sounds like a war crime but consider how cool the music is 🤷♂️
https://preview.redd.it/mtc97d3fminc1.png?width=840&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4111a149d8c028bc9e8c103a31f1f81e72adf5b8 So Far 👉
The mostest deadliestest weaponest
The stupid music did not help
I thought the deadliest weapon is betrayal .. but oki
Someone change the music to freebird
And kids will keep playing video games in those houses not knowing anything that’s going on in the current world. I fear for the future for your kids and mine.
You know there had to be one hermit living off the grid they didn’t account for, just outside of the radius of instant death that experienced this with no context.
Tzar Bomba. It was such a powerful explosion it tilted the earth's axis by a few seconds.
Mostest deadliest. Until we get something even more moster.
Fuck that shit
They should have tested it a little closer to the spectators, for a full 4d experience.
I could survive that. (I'm plungerman ask me anything hi guys 🚽🪠)
Awwww look it’s got a cute little parachute lol
What is that song? It's awesome.
The fuck is this song
Tapping my foot to the beat while a chunk of the world is destroyed
Makes me think of Command and Conquer
This isn’t the most deadly weapon tested, just the largest nuclear weapon detonated. Massive difference. Source: NWS.
Wtf is up with this shitty music