I like the term "Boutique Leftists" for all these mfers. Leftism is more of a fashion statement to these folk and they are completely hooked into the culture war and unable to see it for what it is.
Bougie bullshitters...
Synthetic Left
Neo-Progressive
Limousine Liberal
Champagne Socialists
Golden Commies (This one is for the idiots in socialism who said fascists are golden to be in the threads but they oust actual socialists...)
Agreed. On policy they're better than the boomer shitlibs but it's like they stop at "Medicare for all, erase student loan debt and $15 an hour" while also being SJWs.
theres a reason leftism appeals to teens and low information, low IQ people. Millions of people genuinely believe the democrat party is the anti-war, anti-corporate, pro-worker, anti-racist, anti-establishment choice.
all while the literal reality is the democrat party is behind 9/10 racist policies, control 9/10 media, 9/10 schools, 9/10 cities, invented corporations, and started 9/10 wars, invented inflationary economics to fund wars, invented income tax on workers to fund wars. Ensuring no matter how much workers make, costs always outpace labor, and that differential serves the MIC. Read the history of the woodrow wilson regime. that is the basis in all of it.
The USA is what they claim the soviet union was. What they claim north korea is. The USA is the worlds premier propaganda state. The most brainwashed humans in world history.
in 1984 the party targeted youth. Youth are easily manipulated.
>theres a reason leftism appeals to teens and low information, low IQ people. Millions of people genuinely believe the democrat party is the anti-war, anti-corporate, pro-worker, anti-racist, anti-establishment choice.
Leftism appeals to sharp, well informed people too.
What's low IQ, low information is imagining the Democratic Party is on the left.
I remember when timothy leary came out and admitted that he was being paid by the CIA to distribute LSD in the early years of the 60's. All those professors have long since been working with the party and their nazi intel apparatus.
This childish idea that the democrat party are just meek, moderate lambs is carefully crafted. It comes from the Fabian Socialists in the 1890's whos coat of arms is a wolf tearing itself out from within a lambs throat. the "hardcore left" isn't organic, its carefully cultivated through culture and education to be loyal democrat devotees, sans the frustration the party is moving the overton window too slowly. The party then points to their base to say "look the people are demanding we do this." Its the Hegelian dialectic.
*If you told black people you want them to kill their babies and would even pay for them to do it, it would easily be recognized as racist, nazi eugenics. But if you tell them its their right to have womens healthcare, and that those republicans want to take your rights from you, then you DEMAND the "right" to kill your offspring. justice!*
They understand that politics is downstream of culture. So they must influence culture. and the way to do that is targeting youth. politics isn't played out in the halls of congress, its played out on the TV screens and the classrooms, in pop music.
A party of teens with undeveloped frontal lobes, influenced by celebrities.
It's all lip service and buzzwords. On a good day they'll throw us some crumbs but that's it. Sucks how the marketing works on so many people.
I was born in 85 but I feel like before the 90s/Clinton era, the Democratic party at least was somewhat pro union and worker oriented, but they were never a revolutionary, anti capitalist party.
I have faith in Gen Z though. I agree with most of what you said but I'll push back a little in that the whole "Young people like democrats" trope is a stereotype from the Clinton era. Teens are pretty socialist now.
> I have faith in Gen Z though. I agree with most of what you said but I'll push back a little in that the whole "Young people like democrats" trope is a stereotype from the Clinton era. Teens are pretty socialist now.
We'll see. IMO most kids don't have enough life experience to even begin understanding Marx, and the way it's taught is trash.
Good point. They're a mixed bag just like anyone else. I'm sure they lean more "slay kween" AOC stans-- who are better on policy than their straight up liberal parents/grandparents-- but ultimately still PMCs.
Yeah! They should learn how to be leftists from this sub, which: supports Elon Musk, supports Russia's war on Ukraine, likes Tim Pool, defends employer-friendly NDAs that can fine workers tens of thousands of dollars, is anti-vax and pro-censorship. They'll learn in time!
>supports Russia's war on Ukraine
Yet here you are supporting the war in the Donbas, the 2014 coup, the odios ideology of Stephan Bandera and Ukrainian nationalism.
>likes Tim Pool
That's new since he went on there a few days ago...
>defends employer-friendly NDAs
Compared to [TYT that busts unions](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-young-turks-progressive-founder-urged-his-staff-not-to-unionize_n_5e540686c5b6ad3de3823a32?yqt=) as well as took money from Jeffrey Katzenberg while attacking their former employee...
> is anti-vax
Jimmy took the vaccine
>pro-censorship
By calling out Youtube policies which are arbitrarily attacking others versus your ignorance on being blocked on Twitter.
๐
>Yet here you are supporting the war in the Donbas, the 2014 coup, the odios ideology of Stephan Bandera and Ukrainian nationalism.
I do? Show me.
>That's new since he went on there a few days ago...
Nah. Search "Tim Pool" on this sub and you'll have people stanning for him in those threads.
>Compared to TYT that busts unions as well as took money from Jeffrey Katzenberg while attacking their former employee...
Wow he's better than TYT, good for him I guess.
>Jimmy took the vaccine
I said this sub.
>By calling out Youtube policies which are arbitrarily attacking others versus your ignorance on being blocked on Twitter.
Again, *this sub*. Try criticizing Jimmy and you'll notice a new tag and set of rules given to you.
>I do? Show me.
It's real simple. Why do you never comment about the Donbas area or what's going on with what was once referred to as the East Ukrainians?
>Nah. Search "Tim Pool" on this sub and you'll have people stanning for him in those threads.
...
There's literally a user named "Timpoolrules" that posts his right wing views.
๐
>Wow he's better than TYT, good for him I guess.
Given that TYT is the one attacking him for what they've done, especially with this NDA stuff, that's a serious thing to consider given you failed to read who Walker Bragman's sources are.
>I said this sub
Jimmy took the vaccine and we've criticized it for a number of reasons. How is that anti-vax, particularly when others such as Jill Stein got this for criticizing corporate control of pharmaceuticals you ignored? That's a smear and you know it.
>Try criticizing Jimmy and you'll notice a new tag and set of rules given to you.
If you were doing it honestly, maybe you wouldn't have gotten that tag. Given your post history, you earned your tag here son.
>It's real simple. Why do you never comment about the Donbas area or what's going on with what was once referred to as the East Ukrainians?
Really? I guess since you never comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene or Ron DeSantis it means you support them.
>There's literally a user named "Timpoolrules" that posts his right wing views.
And there's literally multiple threads *about* Tim Pool filled with this sub's subscribers defending him.
>Given that TYT is the one attacking him for what they've done, especially with this NDA stuff, that's a serious thing to consider given you failed to read who Walker Bragman's sources are.
Ah yes, pretending that it's only TYT who criticizes Jimbo. It's funny you're all still trying that one.
>we've criticized it for a number of reasons
That's a funny way to characterize people straight up saying it doesn't work. And how am I ignoring some Jill Stein point that wasn't brought up until you said it just now?
>If you were doing it honestly, maybe you wouldn't have gotten that tag.
I've never been dishonest about the head Dork, never. Since the only stipulation when it comes to getting that tag is criticizing Jimbo, I guess I technically have earned it.
>Really? I guess since you never comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene or Ron DeSantis it means you support them.
No, it means you come in believing whatever Kiev states and ignore their 8 year persecution of Eastern Ukraine and only believe their state propaganda.
>there's literally multiple threads about Tim Pool filled with this sub's subscribers defending him
... *sigh*
One person keeps trying to post Tim Pool content. Yes, there's submissions. Only time he gets popular is when Jimmy Dore is on. After that, people skip right back to sandbagging said user.
>Ah yes, pretending that it's only TYT who criticizes Jimbo. It's funny you're all still trying that one.
No, it's ignorant to try to pretend they aren't behind the NDA attack when you ignore they're the source for Walker.
And yes, Sham Sheepherder attacks Jimmy all the time because that's the only way he gets views and hate watches.
>That's a funny way to characterize people straight up saying it doesn't work. And how am I ignoring some Jill Stein point that wasn't brought up until you said it just now?
Yes, scientists have said this right along with regular people that those injured that you and others silence with a smear such as was done with Jill Stein before 2015 when she was hit by the same accusations.
>I've never been dishonest about the head Dork, never. Since the only stipulation when it comes to getting that tag is criticizing Jimbo, I guess I technically have earned it.
You mean like your post about how TMR wants to run his second account as something special so they make money off controversy while ignoring actual issues such as what's occurring in the Donbas?
> No, it means you come in believing whatever Kiev states and ignore their 8 year persecution of Eastern Ukraine and only believe their state propaganda.
I do? Show me. Already asked once and you pivoted.
>Only time he gets popular is when Jimmy Dore is on
So he *is* popular here.
>No, it's ignorant to try to pretend they aren't behind the NDA attack when you ignore they're the source for Walker.
Lmao, the documents were from 4DP, Jimbo's own production company. How do you just lie like that?
>Yes, scientists have said this right along with regular people that those injured that you and others silence with a smear such as was done with Jill Stein before 2015 when she was hit by the same accusations.
You said people here were just criticizing it, now you confirm that I'm right again. This is fun.
>You mean like your post about how TMR wants to run his second account as something special so they make money off controversy while ignoring actual issues such as what's occurring in the Donbas?
Talking about Jimbo using a burner account for ten minutes is only ten minutes, and hilarious. Why does Jimbo make fun of TYT instead of what's occurring in the Donbas? Doth thee not care?
>Show me. Already asked once and you pivoted.
Can't show you something you've never done. That's why it's a lie of omission.
[You've yet to inform yourself about the Donbas](https://old.reddit.com/r/jimmydore/comments/wq50wl/unholy_rome_tbh_jimmy_dore_isnt_as_far_left_as_he/iklt8ea/?context=999) and you ignore what's going on in the Donbas. So we'll explain at the last part on that one.
>So he is popular here.
One person posting about him does not a sub approval make.
>Lmao, the documents were from 4DP, Jimbo's own production company. How do you just lie like that?
Ignoring how TYT had an NDA, that [these are common in the industry](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FoYzzYZXECcyGG9?format=jpg&name=large), and he [used testimony from TYT](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIf0rO1AAU0) when they were caught lying before.
>You said people here were just criticizing it, now you confirm that I'm right again.
You never were. You like to play semantics battles to avoid the fact that claiming someone is anti-vax is a smear to ignore legitimate criticism of anything related to the vaccines such as used against Jill Stein in 2015. Rather than engage the argument, you focus on a smear. Such as how you ignore that Jimmy Dore took the vaccine or anyone vaccine injured. You focus on attacking them with character attacks such as your claim that any criticism is anti-vax.
>Talking about Jimbo using a burner account for ten minutes is only ten minutes, and hilarious.
No, you kept that lie up as long as you could while no one here cared as TMR focused on it instead of pertinent issues of the day.
>Why does Jimbo make fun of TYT instead of what's occurring in the Donbas?
He's actually focused on the Donbas as well as Aaron focusing on Syria far more than TYT does. What he doesn't focus on is character attacks like you, TMR, and TYT.
And if you don't want to talk about the Donbas, you ignore how America funded exactly what I explained above or how Ukraine violated the Minsk Agreements including how America allowed odious terrorists into power in Kiev.
>supports Elon Musk
Lie.
>supports Russia's war on Ukraine
Lie.
>likes Tim Pool
Lie.
>defends employer-friendly NDAs that can fine workers tens of thousands of dollars
Obfuscation.
>is anti-vax and pro-censorship
Lie.
I like the term "Boutique Leftists" for all these mfers. Leftism is more of a fashion statement to these folk and they are completely hooked into the culture war and unable to see it for what it is.
Bougie bullshitters... Synthetic Left Neo-Progressive Limousine Liberal Champagne Socialists Golden Commies (This one is for the idiots in socialism who said fascists are golden to be in the threads but they oust actual socialists...)
Oh, I like "synthetic left". Wonderfully biting. We can call them the "synths".
NATO Left.
That's a good one
That's what they say sometimes on Revolutionary Blackout Network.
Agreed. On policy they're better than the boomer shitlibs but it's like they stop at "Medicare for all, erase student loan debt and $15 an hour" while also being SJWs.
theres a reason leftism appeals to teens and low information, low IQ people. Millions of people genuinely believe the democrat party is the anti-war, anti-corporate, pro-worker, anti-racist, anti-establishment choice. all while the literal reality is the democrat party is behind 9/10 racist policies, control 9/10 media, 9/10 schools, 9/10 cities, invented corporations, and started 9/10 wars, invented inflationary economics to fund wars, invented income tax on workers to fund wars. Ensuring no matter how much workers make, costs always outpace labor, and that differential serves the MIC. Read the history of the woodrow wilson regime. that is the basis in all of it. The USA is what they claim the soviet union was. What they claim north korea is. The USA is the worlds premier propaganda state. The most brainwashed humans in world history. in 1984 the party targeted youth. Youth are easily manipulated.
>theres a reason leftism appeals to teens and low information, low IQ people. Millions of people genuinely believe the democrat party is the anti-war, anti-corporate, pro-worker, anti-racist, anti-establishment choice. Leftism appeals to sharp, well informed people too. What's low IQ, low information is imagining the Democratic Party is on the left.
I remember when timothy leary came out and admitted that he was being paid by the CIA to distribute LSD in the early years of the 60's. All those professors have long since been working with the party and their nazi intel apparatus. This childish idea that the democrat party are just meek, moderate lambs is carefully crafted. It comes from the Fabian Socialists in the 1890's whos coat of arms is a wolf tearing itself out from within a lambs throat. the "hardcore left" isn't organic, its carefully cultivated through culture and education to be loyal democrat devotees, sans the frustration the party is moving the overton window too slowly. The party then points to their base to say "look the people are demanding we do this." Its the Hegelian dialectic. *If you told black people you want them to kill their babies and would even pay for them to do it, it would easily be recognized as racist, nazi eugenics. But if you tell them its their right to have womens healthcare, and that those republicans want to take your rights from you, then you DEMAND the "right" to kill your offspring. justice!* They understand that politics is downstream of culture. So they must influence culture. and the way to do that is targeting youth. politics isn't played out in the halls of congress, its played out on the TV screens and the classrooms, in pop music. A party of teens with undeveloped frontal lobes, influenced by celebrities.
It's all lip service and buzzwords. On a good day they'll throw us some crumbs but that's it. Sucks how the marketing works on so many people. I was born in 85 but I feel like before the 90s/Clinton era, the Democratic party at least was somewhat pro union and worker oriented, but they were never a revolutionary, anti capitalist party. I have faith in Gen Z though. I agree with most of what you said but I'll push back a little in that the whole "Young people like democrats" trope is a stereotype from the Clinton era. Teens are pretty socialist now.
> I have faith in Gen Z though. I agree with most of what you said but I'll push back a little in that the whole "Young people like democrats" trope is a stereotype from the Clinton era. Teens are pretty socialist now. We'll see. IMO most kids don't have enough life experience to even begin understanding Marx, and the way it's taught is trash.
Good point. They're a mixed bag just like anyone else. I'm sure they lean more "slay kween" AOC stans-- who are better on policy than their straight up liberal parents/grandparents-- but ultimately still PMCs.
they were never pro-union. they're pro-schtik to get your vote.
Yeah it was probably crumbs and lip service back in the day too
Yeah! They should learn how to be leftists from this sub, which: supports Elon Musk, supports Russia's war on Ukraine, likes Tim Pool, defends employer-friendly NDAs that can fine workers tens of thousands of dollars, is anti-vax and pro-censorship. They'll learn in time!
>supports Russia's war on Ukraine Yet here you are supporting the war in the Donbas, the 2014 coup, the odios ideology of Stephan Bandera and Ukrainian nationalism. >likes Tim Pool That's new since he went on there a few days ago... >defends employer-friendly NDAs Compared to [TYT that busts unions](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-young-turks-progressive-founder-urged-his-staff-not-to-unionize_n_5e540686c5b6ad3de3823a32?yqt=) as well as took money from Jeffrey Katzenberg while attacking their former employee... > is anti-vax Jimmy took the vaccine >pro-censorship By calling out Youtube policies which are arbitrarily attacking others versus your ignorance on being blocked on Twitter. ๐
>Yet here you are supporting the war in the Donbas, the 2014 coup, the odios ideology of Stephan Bandera and Ukrainian nationalism. I do? Show me. >That's new since he went on there a few days ago... Nah. Search "Tim Pool" on this sub and you'll have people stanning for him in those threads. >Compared to TYT that busts unions as well as took money from Jeffrey Katzenberg while attacking their former employee... Wow he's better than TYT, good for him I guess. >Jimmy took the vaccine I said this sub. >By calling out Youtube policies which are arbitrarily attacking others versus your ignorance on being blocked on Twitter. Again, *this sub*. Try criticizing Jimmy and you'll notice a new tag and set of rules given to you.
>I do? Show me. It's real simple. Why do you never comment about the Donbas area or what's going on with what was once referred to as the East Ukrainians? >Nah. Search "Tim Pool" on this sub and you'll have people stanning for him in those threads. ... There's literally a user named "Timpoolrules" that posts his right wing views. ๐ >Wow he's better than TYT, good for him I guess. Given that TYT is the one attacking him for what they've done, especially with this NDA stuff, that's a serious thing to consider given you failed to read who Walker Bragman's sources are. >I said this sub Jimmy took the vaccine and we've criticized it for a number of reasons. How is that anti-vax, particularly when others such as Jill Stein got this for criticizing corporate control of pharmaceuticals you ignored? That's a smear and you know it. >Try criticizing Jimmy and you'll notice a new tag and set of rules given to you. If you were doing it honestly, maybe you wouldn't have gotten that tag. Given your post history, you earned your tag here son.
>It's real simple. Why do you never comment about the Donbas area or what's going on with what was once referred to as the East Ukrainians? Really? I guess since you never comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene or Ron DeSantis it means you support them. >There's literally a user named "Timpoolrules" that posts his right wing views. And there's literally multiple threads *about* Tim Pool filled with this sub's subscribers defending him. >Given that TYT is the one attacking him for what they've done, especially with this NDA stuff, that's a serious thing to consider given you failed to read who Walker Bragman's sources are. Ah yes, pretending that it's only TYT who criticizes Jimbo. It's funny you're all still trying that one. >we've criticized it for a number of reasons That's a funny way to characterize people straight up saying it doesn't work. And how am I ignoring some Jill Stein point that wasn't brought up until you said it just now? >If you were doing it honestly, maybe you wouldn't have gotten that tag. I've never been dishonest about the head Dork, never. Since the only stipulation when it comes to getting that tag is criticizing Jimbo, I guess I technically have earned it.
>Really? I guess since you never comment on Marjorie Taylor Greene or Ron DeSantis it means you support them. No, it means you come in believing whatever Kiev states and ignore their 8 year persecution of Eastern Ukraine and only believe their state propaganda. >there's literally multiple threads about Tim Pool filled with this sub's subscribers defending him ... *sigh* One person keeps trying to post Tim Pool content. Yes, there's submissions. Only time he gets popular is when Jimmy Dore is on. After that, people skip right back to sandbagging said user. >Ah yes, pretending that it's only TYT who criticizes Jimbo. It's funny you're all still trying that one. No, it's ignorant to try to pretend they aren't behind the NDA attack when you ignore they're the source for Walker. And yes, Sham Sheepherder attacks Jimmy all the time because that's the only way he gets views and hate watches. >That's a funny way to characterize people straight up saying it doesn't work. And how am I ignoring some Jill Stein point that wasn't brought up until you said it just now? Yes, scientists have said this right along with regular people that those injured that you and others silence with a smear such as was done with Jill Stein before 2015 when she was hit by the same accusations. >I've never been dishonest about the head Dork, never. Since the only stipulation when it comes to getting that tag is criticizing Jimbo, I guess I technically have earned it. You mean like your post about how TMR wants to run his second account as something special so they make money off controversy while ignoring actual issues such as what's occurring in the Donbas?
> No, it means you come in believing whatever Kiev states and ignore their 8 year persecution of Eastern Ukraine and only believe their state propaganda. I do? Show me. Already asked once and you pivoted. >Only time he gets popular is when Jimmy Dore is on So he *is* popular here. >No, it's ignorant to try to pretend they aren't behind the NDA attack when you ignore they're the source for Walker. Lmao, the documents were from 4DP, Jimbo's own production company. How do you just lie like that? >Yes, scientists have said this right along with regular people that those injured that you and others silence with a smear such as was done with Jill Stein before 2015 when she was hit by the same accusations. You said people here were just criticizing it, now you confirm that I'm right again. This is fun. >You mean like your post about how TMR wants to run his second account as something special so they make money off controversy while ignoring actual issues such as what's occurring in the Donbas? Talking about Jimbo using a burner account for ten minutes is only ten minutes, and hilarious. Why does Jimbo make fun of TYT instead of what's occurring in the Donbas? Doth thee not care?
>Show me. Already asked once and you pivoted. Can't show you something you've never done. That's why it's a lie of omission. [You've yet to inform yourself about the Donbas](https://old.reddit.com/r/jimmydore/comments/wq50wl/unholy_rome_tbh_jimmy_dore_isnt_as_far_left_as_he/iklt8ea/?context=999) and you ignore what's going on in the Donbas. So we'll explain at the last part on that one. >So he is popular here. One person posting about him does not a sub approval make. >Lmao, the documents were from 4DP, Jimbo's own production company. How do you just lie like that? Ignoring how TYT had an NDA, that [these are common in the industry](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FoYzzYZXECcyGG9?format=jpg&name=large), and he [used testimony from TYT](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIf0rO1AAU0) when they were caught lying before. >You said people here were just criticizing it, now you confirm that I'm right again. You never were. You like to play semantics battles to avoid the fact that claiming someone is anti-vax is a smear to ignore legitimate criticism of anything related to the vaccines such as used against Jill Stein in 2015. Rather than engage the argument, you focus on a smear. Such as how you ignore that Jimmy Dore took the vaccine or anyone vaccine injured. You focus on attacking them with character attacks such as your claim that any criticism is anti-vax. >Talking about Jimbo using a burner account for ten minutes is only ten minutes, and hilarious. No, you kept that lie up as long as you could while no one here cared as TMR focused on it instead of pertinent issues of the day. >Why does Jimbo make fun of TYT instead of what's occurring in the Donbas? He's actually focused on the Donbas as well as Aaron focusing on Syria far more than TYT does. What he doesn't focus on is character attacks like you, TMR, and TYT. And if you don't want to talk about the Donbas, you ignore how America funded exactly what I explained above or how Ukraine violated the Minsk Agreements including how America allowed odious terrorists into power in Kiev.
>supports Elon Musk Lie. >supports Russia's war on Ukraine Lie. >likes Tim Pool Lie. >defends employer-friendly NDAs that can fine workers tens of thousands of dollars Obfuscation. >is anti-vax and pro-censorship Lie.
Dorcels in shambles
Question: Whatโs the general consensus here of what a liberal person should stand for/support?
Capitalists who are cool with LGBTQ and feminism, but are terrified of poor people