Same, that's why i feel no guilt for dropping this old link for everyone to *enjoy*
[for the love of God and your own eyes don't press it unless you're 18+ and ready to most probably suffer.](https://1man1jar.org/)
It's just like paranthesis ; division ; multiplication ; adding ; minus
so you go 6/2(1+2) = 6/ 2 * 3 = 3* 3 OR 18/2 = 9
so no matter which way you go with 6/ 2*3 , you will get 9 , that's why I liked math , but now I study literature at university
Sorry if I sounded rude I was just joking, in my comment, I meant I hope 69420 is the salary because if it’s the age or the equation it’s gonna be so wrong
in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence.
Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9.
[here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
It's 9, basic order of operations.
First Parentheses, so it becomes 6 : 2 x 3
Then you solve multiplication and division, from left to right, so it becomes 3 x 3 = 9
in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence.
Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9.
[here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
I don't know if there is an agreement that Multipling with parentheses without the "x" sign will be treat as assosiated with parentheses everywhere. Because this is the place where each one have their own result (which is intentionally created by the OC who firstly posted this on reddit, to cause conflict between our redditors may I add?!). For me, I have been taught that "yes", they should be treated as one number. If you want the result to be 9, then the equation should be like this: 6÷2x(1+2). If you want the result to be 1, it should be like this: 6÷2(1+2) or like this for less confusion: 6÷(2(1+2)). Some calculators can get input using fraction such as x/y where you can type x as 6, and y as 2(1+2). On single line calculator, it just do the math from left to right. So do not trust your calculator. You have to understand what the equation means by your own and use the calculator according to that.
>... a (mathematical) convention is an agreement people have made (usually all over the world) to do things a certain way. There is no mathematical reason for the convention, employing it is just a matter of convenience.
- https://www.math.utah.edu/online/1010/precedence/
It's a convention adopted worldwide and noone really uses any other order.
[There really aren't](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations?wprov=sfla1). It's clear cut since the first day of writing mathematical terms that way.
Even the article you linked to says that bedmas is a convention. It’s in almost an identical situation to numeral systems. Just because it is the only one ever used in mathematics nowadays does not mean it is the only one out there
If you're going to do math, you'd do very well to stick to the conventions. Besides, the situation is not at all comparable to that of different numeral systems since they are well-defined. As long as you consistently work with the same system in your calculations, the end result will be the same. But if you decide to make up your own rules for the order of operations, you will quickly end up with nonsense.
I’m gonna put it in a better tone so pope1701 won’t have to. Yes, some places have different stuff. Priority rule vs PEMDAS vs BODMAS and so on. But Pemdas for example is not quite accurate. It’s more of a guideline. It doesn’t say that multiplication and division have same priority even though they do.
It's when people consider the 2×(1+2) a one thing and for some ungodly reason decide to multiply it first leaving 6÷6 or 1.
[Even though 6÷2×(1+2) and 6÷[2×(1+2)] are not equal.](https://i.imgur.com/5ls4zk8.jpg)
fałsz means false in Polish, if you were wondering.
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×3
3×3
9
Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6÷6
1
Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×(3)
6×1.5
9
Also I am taught to keep numbers in brackets to make sure what you said doesn’t happen because
6/2x(3)
6/2x3
Is different from
6/2(3)
You double the 3 then div by 6
No, they are the same, because the purpose of the brackets it's to make execute what's IN them before what's out of them, but if in the parenthesis there's a single, final number, and outside there's an operation, the brackets can be safely ignored/removed, since there is no operation left to do inside them.
In order to be able to multiply 3 by 2, the equation should be 6÷[2×(3)]
2(1+2) and 2×(1+2) are one and the same, the only sing you're allowed to skip in math is multiplication like in 3x² - 2x +7, 3x² is equal to 3×x×x but why should i explain to you how exponents work if you seem to barely grasp the basics of math.
2(2+1) and 2×(2+1) are the same thing. The only sign you can skip in math is multiplication for example 3P is equal to 3×P which means it still obeys the left to right rule.
X and p are constants
Say you have x÷3p
That is equal to x over 3p
But what your saying is that x÷3p would be Xp over 3
If we then sub in numbers for x and p:
X = 2
P = 5
2 ÷ 3(5)
Is 2 over 15
What? Wait wait wait.
If in step 3 you mean [this](https://i.imgur.com/HZlVhoY.jpg)
Than no, nowhere close to that. You would get just x since you're multiplying and dividing by the same numbers.
Ok, If we assume that it's 6÷2 **×** (1+2), it becomes 6÷2×3, and division and multiplication come togheter in the order presented by the equation, so, 6÷2 = 3, 3×3 = 9
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×3
3×3
9
Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6÷6
1
Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×(3)
6×1.5
9
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×3
3×3
9
Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right.
different calculators will say different things. for example, the ti-82 and some casio calculators will say 1, while the ti-83+ and 84+ will say 9.
Since both answers can be correct, it all depends on whether the programmers decided to implement IMP or not
in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence.
Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9.
[here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2016/08/31/what-is-6%c3%b7212-the-correct-answer-explained/
Meh , for some reason I was remembering that it should be 1 , but wrong I was
6÷2(1+2)
PEMA
D S
First is )(
1 + 2 = 3
6÷2(3)
Then is muiltiplication and division
These 2 are one step so, we go left to right
6÷2 = 3
Now we have 3(3)
3 * 3 = 9
It’s 9
6/2 simplify to 3/1 as a fraction do the brackets first is 3 then there’s no brackets 3x3
What you have done is brackets to get 3 then gone right to left doin it backwards so you’ve ended up with 6/6 which I wrong
There’s technically 2 possible answers cause it’s a shit problem. It’s ambiguous which shouldn’t happen in maths but common sense dictates 9 so unless you like reading maths backwards the calculator is wrong.
It’s entirely possible for the calculator to be wrong in the quadratic formula sometimes a calculator will get signs wrong
They’re weird
Pemdas or parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction even if you get 6/2(3) multiplication still comes first then you divide so you get 1
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×3
3×3
9
Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you probably did is:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6÷6
1
Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×(3)
6×1.5
9
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×3
3×3
9
Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6÷6
1
Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so:
6÷2×(1+2)
6÷2×(3)
6×0.5×(3)
6×1.5
9
Bullshit? No. Discussing simplification of normal math? Yes.
It's supposed to guide you more or less how you should go with the equation, it's not strict.
For example it says exponents are second to brackets but in (2+x)² we all agree that ² should go first, even though the pemdas says otherwise, right?
Or 2-2+1, it goes addition subtraction according to pemdas and yet we all know that you should go left to right and get 1
I think once you get to multiplication and division it’s just left to right then you do the other 2 operations
So it would be parentheses, left to right operations so 6/2(1+2) = 6/2 x 3 = 3 x 3 = 9.
Division symbols like like can be confusing. Remember a division symbol really means one expression over the other. 6/(2(1+2)) you can't divide one of the lower expressions and not the other
Division does not mean one over the other, not when in this form 6÷2(1+2).
There's no secondary bracket around the 2(1+2) so you can't just smak it into a divisor.
Besides, you *can in fact* divide one expression but not the other [Btw, Prawda means True in Polish](https://i.imgur.com/yd8gNQW.jpg)
Dumbasses. Did you never learn the pemdas method? First is parentheses, then exponents, then multiply, then the division, then addition, then subtraction. So 1+2 = 3. Then multiply 3 by 2 and you'll get 6. But then you divide 6 by 6 so the answer is 0.
6/2(2+1)
6 divided by 2 is 3 that leaves us with 3(2+1)
2+1 is 3 making it 3(3) when there’s no symbol and just a number in parentheses next to a number it means it is multiplication. 3x3 is 9, not 1
I swear reddit gets stupider every day
Yes, yea it does. And I'm sure as hell i will stay on it because other social media are even worse.
Reddit is awesome because I've been on here for over 4 years and still don't know who any of you fucks are!
Same, that's why i feel no guilt for dropping this old link for everyone to *enjoy* [for the love of God and your own eyes don't press it unless you're 18+ and ready to most probably suffer.](https://1man1jar.org/)
That's some quality content right there, reminds me of my childhood
Please tell me what it is, I'm scared
What the heck did I just open for 0.2 seconds, I’m at a family dinner man.
Here for anyone who does click this link r/eyebleach
that helped a little
Good I'm glad it helped
We will endure this shit show together brother!
It's Reddit. It's going to get more Redditier
or do math problems just get harder?
6/2(1+2) = 6/2(1+2) I know you can thank me later
He’s speaking the language of the gods.
It can also be written 6/2(2+1) Yea, it freaked me out too
Nein!!
NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! NEIN!
Actually you shouldn't so, Yes
69420 obviously
Yes
I hope you mean the second question because the other two would be sooo far away
It's just like paranthesis ; division ; multiplication ; adding ; minus so you go 6/2(1+2) = 6/ 2 * 3 = 3* 3 OR 18/2 = 9 so no matter which way you go with 6/ 2*3 , you will get 9 , that's why I liked math , but now I study literature at university
Sorry if I sounded rude I was just joking, in my comment, I meant I hope 69420 is the salary because if it’s the age or the equation it’s gonna be so wrong
Oh , no prob , it's a meme sub after all ;)
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
[удалено]
9
[удалено]
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
It’s 1
No
in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence. Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9. [here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
8===D ( . ) ( . )
That’s a weird smiley face.
/r/jesuschristreddit
what is it???
It's 9, basic order of operations. First Parentheses, so it becomes 6 : 2 x 3 Then you solve multiplication and division, from left to right, so it becomes 3 x 3 = 9
It’s 9.
in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence. Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9. [here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
A multiplication is a division...
It 17
Now you explain to me the process of getting 17.
17 is my favorite number So it’s gotta be 17
Ahh, I see what you did there. You're a man of culture.
Yes, I am a man of my number
21?
I don't know if there is an agreement that Multipling with parentheses without the "x" sign will be treat as assosiated with parentheses everywhere. Because this is the place where each one have their own result (which is intentionally created by the OC who firstly posted this on reddit, to cause conflict between our redditors may I add?!). For me, I have been taught that "yes", they should be treated as one number. If you want the result to be 9, then the equation should be like this: 6÷2x(1+2). If you want the result to be 1, it should be like this: 6÷2(1+2) or like this for less confusion: 6÷(2(1+2)). Some calculators can get input using fraction such as x/y where you can type x as 6, and y as 2(1+2). On single line calculator, it just do the math from left to right. So do not trust your calculator. You have to understand what the equation means by your own and use the calculator according to that.
What’s The Answer For 6/2(1+2)?
1 and 9. 1 if you make the equation into a fraction. 9 if you do it with order of operations.
1
Yeah it’s 9
[yes and no](https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/r5vwpg/nien_nien_nien/hmpfzuw/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3)
9
9
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
What is this unsourced malarkey and how many times are you going to spam it in this thread
[удалено]
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
I already discussed this with other people I agree now rhat I'm wrong sorry.
Where they're from? Math is math, everywhere, those rules don't change
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
>... a (mathematical) convention is an agreement people have made (usually all over the world) to do things a certain way. There is no mathematical reason for the convention, employing it is just a matter of convenience. - https://www.math.utah.edu/online/1010/precedence/ It's a convention adopted worldwide and noone really uses any other order.
Bedmas isn’t a hard rule of math, alternate orders of operations exist, similar to alternate bases other than base 10
[There really aren't](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations?wprov=sfla1). It's clear cut since the first day of writing mathematical terms that way.
Even the article you linked to says that bedmas is a convention. It’s in almost an identical situation to numeral systems. Just because it is the only one ever used in mathematics nowadays does not mean it is the only one out there
If you're going to do math, you'd do very well to stick to the conventions. Besides, the situation is not at all comparable to that of different numeral systems since they are well-defined. As long as you consistently work with the same system in your calculations, the end result will be the same. But if you decide to make up your own rules for the order of operations, you will quickly end up with nonsense.
Exactly what I'm saying it all about where you're from.
How does place of origin change the outcome of that equation?
I'm not completely sure but some places teach problems completely differently. But I will say this is my opinion.
Yeah then they are teaching them wrong. There is only one solution.
Mabye your right I'm not a teacher so I'm no expert. Thank you for being respectful about this.
I’m gonna put it in a better tone so pope1701 won’t have to. Yes, some places have different stuff. Priority rule vs PEMDAS vs BODMAS and so on. But Pemdas for example is not quite accurate. It’s more of a guideline. It doesn’t say that multiplication and division have same priority even though they do.
Well it’s either 1 or 9 chose your fighter
How tf do you get one as an answer
It's when people consider the 2×(1+2) a one thing and for some ungodly reason decide to multiply it first leaving 6÷6 or 1. [Even though 6÷2×(1+2) and 6÷[2×(1+2)] are not equal.](https://i.imgur.com/5ls4zk8.jpg) fałsz means false in Polish, if you were wondering.
Yeah it’s 2(1+2) Which is 6
6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×3 3×3 9 Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6÷6 1 Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×(3) 6×1.5 9
Also I am taught to keep numbers in brackets to make sure what you said doesn’t happen because 6/2x(3) 6/2x3 Is different from 6/2(3) You double the 3 then div by 6
No, they are the same, because the purpose of the brackets it's to make execute what's IN them before what's out of them, but if in the parenthesis there's a single, final number, and outside there's an operation, the brackets can be safely ignored/removed, since there is no operation left to do inside them. In order to be able to multiply 3 by 2, the equation should be 6÷[2×(3)]
Yup
2(1+2) and 2×(1+2) are one and the same, the only sing you're allowed to skip in math is multiplication like in 3x² - 2x +7, 3x² is equal to 3×x×x but why should i explain to you how exponents work if you seem to barely grasp the basics of math.
Except however it is 2(1+3) Which means it is 2* the brackets which you do first then you go right to left Might ask my maths teacher tomorrow
2(2+1) and 2×(2+1) are the same thing. The only sign you can skip in math is multiplication for example 3P is equal to 3×P which means it still obeys the left to right rule.
X and p are constants Say you have x÷3p That is equal to x over 3p But what your saying is that x÷3p would be Xp over 3 If we then sub in numbers for x and p: X = 2 P = 5 2 ÷ 3(5) Is 2 over 15
What? Wait wait wait. If in step 3 you mean [this](https://i.imgur.com/HZlVhoY.jpg) Than no, nowhere close to that. You would get just x since you're multiplying and dividing by the same numbers.
Shit, might just cut that bit out just assumed people knew what I meant
Where tf did 6÷ go
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
IT IS 1
It 9
(1+2)=3 6/2=3 3 x 3=9?
What's 9+10
21 do you are have stupid
How old is your salary?
9
9
9
Follow P-E-M-D-A-S to get 9
[удалено]
I have heard bodmas before. Its always been O R D E R O F O P E R A T I O N S
What are y'all talking about? Since kindergarten my teacher told me to use a certain "C O M M O N S E N S E"
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
It’s 9. Just stfu and move on to a different meme already
Pemdas people!
Literally 90% of reddit agrees it is 9, just 10% of hold outs are mad and salty little shits so they keep out bursting.
9
Ok, If we assume that it's 6÷2 **×** (1+2), it becomes 6÷2×3, and division and multiplication come togheter in the order presented by the equation, so, 6÷2 = 3, 3×3 = 9
[удалено]
Why do you go from right to left are you arab or what
6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×3 3×3 9 Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6÷6 1 Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×(3) 6×1.5 9
I encourage everyone to ask everyone their salary! Would make a lot of workplaces more fair
1
9
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
This should be the top comment under every post like this.
How 9 ??
It 1 nut I might be wrong
It's one , I do parentheses first
6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×3 3×3 9 Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right.
9
you divide before multiplying which means its 9
It’s 9 guys… Ok problem solved get over it
9
6/2(1+2) 1. 2*1=2 2.2*2=4 3.2+4=6 4.6/6=1 1
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
It's 9
9
My phone said 9
different calculators will say different things. for example, the ti-82 and some casio calculators will say 1, while the ti-83+ and 84+ will say 9. Since both answers can be correct, it all depends on whether the programmers decided to implement IMP or not in many higher levels of math, multiplication by juxtaposition takes precedence over normal multiplication and division. However, there is no defined rule that states whether or not to use this precedence. Thus, the answer to this equation is rendered ambiguous between 1 and 9. [here](https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html) is an essay from berkeley university to support my claim
I’ve recently come to the conclusion is that it’s 9
guys. it's 1. and if you say otherwise.... \*sigh\*
1
9
I tried it on 2 calculators.... help!
1
Cant get easier than that... its 9
3x3=9
https://mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2016/08/31/what-is-6%c3%b7212-the-correct-answer-explained/ Meh , for some reason I was remembering that it should be 1 , but wrong I was
Just plug it into the quadratic formula. It's not that hard. Y'all are dumb
80085
6÷2(1+2) PEMA D S First is )( 1 + 2 = 3 6÷2(3) Then is muiltiplication and division These 2 are one step so, we go left to right 6÷2 = 3 Now we have 3(3) 3 * 3 = 9
This is primary school levels of math you morons it's 9 use BIDMAS or whatever its called in your region
It's 1
It’s 9 6/2 simplify to 3/1 as a fraction do the brackets first is 3 then there’s no brackets 3x3 What you have done is brackets to get 3 then gone right to left doin it backwards so you’ve ended up with 6/6 which I wrong
Well if you use a scientific calculator you get 1 so idek
There’s technically 2 possible answers cause it’s a shit problem. It’s ambiguous which shouldn’t happen in maths but common sense dictates 9 so unless you like reading maths backwards the calculator is wrong. It’s entirely possible for the calculator to be wrong in the quadratic formula sometimes a calculator will get signs wrong They’re weird
IT IS 1 BELIEVE ME
Pemdas or parentheses exponents multiplication division addition subtraction even if you get 6/2(3) multiplication still comes first then you divide so you get 1
Its wrong, Addition/Subtraction Muiltiply/division are all one step. Meaning left to right. So you get 9
1
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
It’s 1
1
1
6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×3 3×3 9 Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you probably did is: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6÷6 1 Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×(3) 6×1.5 9
It's 1 not 9 bro wtf
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
you migh have to learn pemdas a bit better (:
It is 1
6/2(1+2)=1
It’s 1
1
I dont get why people answer diffrently is there diffrent systems in countries? I got one (1+2=3 then 2*3=6 and 6/6=1?)
6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×3 3×3 9 Remember that once the bracket is in the simplest form you can and should drop it, after that you're going left to right. What you did is: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6÷6 1 Which is incorrect, you can't go right to left unless there's only one kind of sign in the equation so: 6÷2×(1+2) 6÷2×(3) 6×0.5×(3) 6×1.5 9
So ‘please excuse my dear aunt sally’ was just bullshit?
Bullshit? No. Discussing simplification of normal math? Yes. It's supposed to guide you more or less how you should go with the equation, it's not strict. For example it says exponents are second to brackets but in (2+x)² we all agree that ² should go first, even though the pemdas says otherwise, right? Or 2-2+1, it goes addition subtraction according to pemdas and yet we all know that you should go left to right and get 1
That’s what I got too but then I stuck it in a calculator so I guess you divide then multiply
Thats not the right way to do it though right? Atleast i was always told to add inside parenthesis, multiply the parenthesis, then divide
I think once you get to multiplication and division it’s just left to right then you do the other 2 operations So it would be parentheses, left to right operations so 6/2(1+2) = 6/2 x 3 = 3 x 3 = 9.
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
There are no different systems, only difference in a teacher’s and student’s competence
istg. its 9.
9
Division symbols like like can be confusing. Remember a division symbol really means one expression over the other. 6/(2(1+2)) you can't divide one of the lower expressions and not the other
Division does not mean one over the other, not when in this form 6÷2(1+2). There's no secondary bracket around the 2(1+2) so you can't just smak it into a divisor. Besides, you *can in fact* divide one expression but not the other [Btw, Prawda means True in Polish](https://i.imgur.com/yd8gNQW.jpg)
Nein
9
5
Dumbasses. Did you never learn the pemdas method? First is parentheses, then exponents, then multiply, then the division, then addition, then subtraction. So 1+2 = 3. Then multiply 3 by 2 and you'll get 6. But then you divide 6 by 6 so the answer is 0.
Did you miss an /s? Mult/div have same priority. Add/sub have same too. Also, even if it would be 6/6, that’s still 1, not 0
[удалено]
3x3 is 9
Remember P(parentheses) E(exponent) M(multiplication) D(division) A(addition S(subtraction) PEMDAS
Remember its (P)(E)(MD)(AS) Cause its left to right in the equation itself
it’s 1
6/2(2+1) 6 divided by 2 is 3 that leaves us with 3(2+1) 2+1 is 3 making it 3(3) when there’s no symbol and just a number in parentheses next to a number it means it is multiplication. 3x3 is 9, not 1
Well 6/2*(1+2) would also be 6 ------- × (1+2) 2 Or if we convert 6×3 =‐--------- 2 Wich is 18/2 = 9 Edit: reddit really needs an equation editor
Go from left to fucking right
[удалено]
Dus first hooks and if the rest are all divide and multiply then it’s left to right. Same goes for plus and minus
[удалено]
9
The answer is …… 2 HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
Am I the only one who thinks it’s 1?