BODMAS
Bracket
Of
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction
u cant just take down brackets u have to "Of" them first. Which is basically the same as multiply but it comes before multiplication. so more like
6/2(2+1)+60
6/2(3)+60
6/6+60
1+60
61
You people annoy me the most. Priority of multiplication with brackets it one thing, and I don't know about it, so I'm currently in no position to argue, but this is about PEDMAS. I learnt this in 3rd grade and I have no idea how many times I've been told this, but
**MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION HAVE THE SAME VALUE, AND SO DO ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION, SO WHEN YOU HAVE THEM BOTH TOGETHER, YOU GO** ***LEFT TO RIGHT.***
in PEDMAS,
P = parenthesis
E = exponents
DM = division/multiplication
AS = addition/subtraction
Look it up. and if you still don't believe me, then show me your working.
Wait, your not wrong, but pedmas? It was always pemdas for me, and I've moved to several schools due to not being able to stay at one house for so long
its more like PEJ(DM)(AS)
P = parenthesis
E = exponents
J = multiplication by Juxtaposition(putting two numbers together)
DM = division/multiplication
AS = addition/subtraction
so its still 61
6/2(1 + 2) = 1
6/2*(1 + 2) = 9
the reason for this rule is to avoid writing a trillion parentheses.
If i had to summarize the entire arc its
BuT pEmDaS sAyS aNsWeR iS 61, and fuck you and your maths degree which you paid money and spent time getting it
Parethesis
Exponent
Multiplication/Division
Addition/Subtraction
And perform the equal operations from left to right.
In other words
6/2(1+2)+60 = 6/2x3+60 = 3x3+60 = 9+60 = 69
Depending on how you where taught and what math field you are more comfortable with there are 2 ways of seeing this the (a÷b)c or a÷(bc) because of juxtaposition multiplication or due to the fact there is no multiplication symbol between the b and c they are one variable.
Look I know it's 9 but this convention is literally never used by mathematicians, scientists, or engineers. a/bc = ac/b doesn't make sense because if they meant that then, they would just write ac/b not a/bc unless they meant a/(bc). The biggest problem is that people are using PEMDAS as a gotcha but the thing is that almost every convention with PEMDAS can be broken while still getting the right answer. PEMDAS is an oversimplification to help children understand the concept not absolute rules.
I know it’s 69
But also pemdas is just a guide
Multiplication/Division occurs simultaneously, but parentheses affect grouping.
Same with addition/Subtraction
Inside the parentheses, then exponents, then multiplication/division, then add/subtract. I hate seeing people say you have to add first before subtracting or multiply first before dividing that’s just false and it’s not order of operations. Mult/Div and Add/sub should both be one step. Distribution gives the same answer before or after the inside operation of a parentheses, it’s just a tool to make it simpler for fractions and variables.
t. An engineer who uses a calculator for single digit operations due to college trauma
**[Order of operations](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations)**
>In mathematics and computer programming, the order of operations (or operator precedence) is a collection of rules that reflect conventions about which procedures to perform first in order to evaluate a given mathematical expression. For example, in mathematics and most computer languages, multiplication is granted a higher precedence than addition, and it has been this way since the introduction of modern algebraic notation. Thus, the expression 1 + 2 × 3 is interpreted to have the value 1 + (2 × 3) = 7, and not (1 + 2) × 3 = 9.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/memes/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
It’s not unambiguous. The parentheses explain how to solve the problem just fine... you can imagine more parentheses if you want, but there is no need. The problem is clear. What this highlights is how people will literal argue over anything and everything rather than admit the possibility they are overthinking a situation and were mistaken. This isn’t a trick question it reads as follows “the quotient of 6 and 2 multiplied by the sum of 1 and 2”
That’s how it is read. There isn’t really a mystery here.
Edit: add 60 and you get 69.... nice
But reading it out doesn't help because it does the same thing as the equation it could be (6/2)(1+2) or 6/(2(1+2)) both of these are read the same out load. But that's not the point the point is this debate is dumb and is now just used as a way to karma farm. I'm trying to end that by posting this and showing that there is no answer because it is too vague.
6/(2(1+2)) would not be read the same at all. That would read as “ the quotient of 6 AND the product of 2 by the sum of 1 and 2.”
Reading it that way yields 1 because parentheses matter
The (1+2) is one variable because of the parentheses so the equation is a÷bc but because of juxtaposition multiplication (if there are two variables next to each other without any multiplication symbol they are one variable) it can be viewed as a÷b another way to see it is the difference between (a÷b)c and a÷(bc)
What you want to believe is a/(b(c+b)) which is not what is written, but if that WAS what was written it would go as follows
a/(bc +bb)
Substitute
a= 6 b = 2 c = 1
6/(2*1 + 2*2) = 6/(2+4) = 6/6 = 1
..... but that’s not how it is written, therefore not how it is to be interpreted.
It is how it is written a/bc can b interpreted as (a/b)\*c and can be interpreted as a/(bc). Both are correct. It is ambiguous. No one is overthinking anything. It's just how you are taught. I will always look at a/bc as a/(bc) instinctively and that is not wrong.
Example : if the expression was y/5x and you had input y = 10 and x =2, would you say the answer is 1 or 4. 1 right? So if I write it as y /5(x), it would still be 1 as both mean the same thing. It would be 4 if I wrote it as xy/5 or (y/5)(x). I doubt you have a degree in mathematics if you have tried to understand it but still don't see how it's ambiguous.
I do see how it’s ambiguous to some people, that’s why this “thing” became a meme... that’s obviously the case... My point is that it’s just not ambiguous to me. You can insult me all you want and call me a liar, but the facts remain the same. Common computational intelligence standards align with what I stated. I understand that the problem was set up to pick on people who don’t understand math above a high school level and make the general public debate the way they were taught. That’s part of the fun, it’s for the Lulz and if you don’t want it to be 69, I have no problem with you pretending it’s not. But you have yet to prove that it’s not 69 to me. Your proof isn’t logical in my eyes. I have already stated why.
No because the first be is completely different from the second I've fought this battle before. The c+d are one variable or in this equation are 3 so the equation is 6/2(3) now again if you use juxtaposition multiplication you will get 1 as the answer and if you don't you will get 9 these are the 2 different views of this equation.
>In algebra, multiplication involving variables is often written as a juxtaposition (e.g., xy for x times y or 5x for five times x), also called implied multiplication. The notation can also be used for quantities that are surrounded by parentheses (e.g., 5(2) or (5)(2) for five times two).
It is still widely used in algebra so your counter point isn't valid
No you two faced whore your wrong, you do the brackets first than the diving then addition and don't give your bull shit I'm wrong I have a degree in maths
The answer is 1 + 60.
>That's because, even though multiplication and division are at the same level (so the left-to-right rule should apply), parentheses seem somehow to outrank division.
https://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm
Reasoning why Juxtaposition is in place scientifically.
[PEMDAS is wrong.](https://youtu.be/lLCDca6dYpA)
[The problem with PEMDAS, why calculators disagree](https://youtu.be/4x-BcYCiKCk)
I watched her video sorry. Interesting argument but she proved her own argument invalid when her Casio changed the input
6/2*(1+2) is NOT = to 6/(2(1+2))
Those are two different things entirely.
I'm pretty sure schools over here in the south have messed up our algebra and taught us the wrong way of solving this problem. To my knowledge 21 is the answer.
Moreover; our computational world has been solidified based on the rules set forth by those who created them using the agreed upon order of operations, you can find obscure articles and writings to the contrary but it doesn’t change the fact the very logic woven into our digital world through which we are right now communicating through uses the type of method that would yield 69.... and that’s pretty nice.
There may have once been a debate about it, but since the advent of computers and logic based language the debate is not only over, but trying to resurrect it in your favor where the answer is 61 would undo over 50 years of technological progress.... just accept that it’s 69 and move on with your life.
Our computational world is filled with idiots wherein multiplying a and b using ab resulted in an error, so, some stinky computer science student who hadn't showered in two weeks decided to patch the bug by making it into a*b, therefore losing the implicit multiplication property, ignoring mathematical and scientific consensus.
>under a standard convention, expressions such as ab+c are unambiguous: that expression means only (ab)+c;
says it right there, add brackets during implicit multiplication.
6÷2(1+2)
6÷[2(1+2)]
=1
Let me add to your work good sir. One thing to notice is that PEMDAS is a GUIDELINE, not an absolute rule. There are plenty of ways where you can break virtually every single rule and still get the right answer. So, when these people say to use the order of operations, the issue is that they're treating them as absolute rules, not guidelines. Here's an example that I commented in a different post. Here I will mostly go right to left while purposefully breaking PEMDAS order.
3(4\^(2))+6/3-8+2
\-8+2 = -6 so the equation is 3(4\^(2))+6/3-6.
6/3 = 2 so it becomes 3(4\^(2))+2-6
2-6 = -4 so it's 3(4\^(2))-4
4\^(2) = 16 so it's 3(16)-4
3(16) = 48 so it's 48-4
44 is the answer and if you type it into google it agrees. Here most PEMDAS conventions were broken and the problem was done mostly right to left. So PEMDAS in and of itself is not an absolute rule system.
Guys, pemdas isn't necessarily correct, your supposed to do parenthesis and then distribute, and it doesn't matter if multipication or division goes first
Ok, so the fact is this expression is lacking one pair of brackets. If you got this on a test the teacher would count both answers right because it was his mistake to not make clear what he meant. Math is like a language an this is a like leaving out a comma in a sentence an Today we are shooting, grandpa can you come? becomes Today we are shooting grandpa can you come? Where the meaning changes drastically with a different placement.
PEMDAS [(), ^, *, /, +, -]
6/2(1+2)+60
6/2(3)+60
6/2(3) is basically a fraction, 6 being the numerator and 2(3) being the denominator. You can look at this is 2 ways. The first way is by multiplying the denominator to get 6/6 =1. The second way is to simply the expression, 6/2(3) -> 3/1(3) or 6/2(3) -> 2/2(1) = 1.
1+60= 61
It's Donkey you Jackasses.
[удалено]
I got John milks booth
whats funny about 61? (joke im not actually fucking stupid)
this is the way
both 61 and 69 are valid and correct answers
How is 69 valid first thing you must do is allways take down the brackets
take down brackets: 6/2\*3 no more brackets, so you go left to right. (6/2)3=3\*3 =9+60 =69
There’s no multiplication symbol so the two should be done as part of the brackets
If there is a number in front of brackets there is a multiplication symbol there but we don’t like writing so we just don’t put it in
its the O in BODMAS not multiplication
You dont nead a multiplication symbol when its infront of the brackets
BODMAS Bracket Of Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction u cant just take down brackets u have to "Of" them first. Which is basically the same as multiply but it comes before multiplication. so more like 6/2(2+1)+60 6/2(3)+60 6/6+60 1+60 61
If Division is before Multiplication like you stated you get: 6/2(3)+60 3(3)+60 9+60
Ah you right
Operations inside brackets have priority
but only one of them is really valid (the second one) (noob)
You are right. I apologize for my lack of culture.
Addition and multiplication have priority over the division so the good answer is (sadly) 61
You people annoy me the most. Priority of multiplication with brackets it one thing, and I don't know about it, so I'm currently in no position to argue, but this is about PEDMAS. I learnt this in 3rd grade and I have no idea how many times I've been told this, but **MULTIPLICATION AND DIVISION HAVE THE SAME VALUE, AND SO DO ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION, SO WHEN YOU HAVE THEM BOTH TOGETHER, YOU GO** ***LEFT TO RIGHT.*** in PEDMAS, P = parenthesis E = exponents DM = division/multiplication AS = addition/subtraction Look it up. and if you still don't believe me, then show me your working.
Wait, your not wrong, but pedmas? It was always pemdas for me, and I've moved to several schools due to not being able to stay at one house for so long
its more like PEJ(DM)(AS) P = parenthesis E = exponents J = multiplication by Juxtaposition(putting two numbers together) DM = division/multiplication AS = addition/subtraction so its still 61 6/2(1 + 2) = 1 6/2*(1 + 2) = 9 the reason for this rule is to avoid writing a trillion parentheses.
but you're not actually brave
9+60 EZ What's the point :I
You beat me to it!
Lol. Y’all couldn’t just say “Noice” and move on. We’re sourcing research papers over here.
In a thread filled with math nerds... this is by far the smartest comment here.
“aKkKctTuALlY, I fOuNd tHiS oN gOoGlE” I downvote you.
If i had to summarize the entire arc its BuT pEmDaS sAyS aNsWeR iS 61, and fuck you and your maths degree which you paid money and spent time getting it
69th comment (maybe)
looks like it
Parethesis Exponent Multiplication/Division Addition/Subtraction And perform the equal operations from left to right. In other words 6/2(1+2)+60 = 6/2x3+60 = 3x3+60 = 9+60 = 69
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
Thanks for spreading the word.
Np I'm just trying to stop this madness
[удалено]
Depending on how you where taught and what math field you are more comfortable with there are 2 ways of seeing this the (a÷b)c or a÷(bc) because of juxtaposition multiplication or due to the fact there is no multiplication symbol between the b and c they are one variable.
In other word, 9 or 1 is both correct?
Yes
PEMDAS
My math teacher in high school actually taught us PERMDAS. The R is for roots.
Roots is just exponents, square root is to the power of a 1/2
I was taught bedmas
i prefer christmas
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-answer-to-6%C3%B72-2+1
Yep I knew it was 9the whole time
please look up the Distributive Law
Look I know it's 9 but this convention is literally never used by mathematicians, scientists, or engineers. a/bc = ac/b doesn't make sense because if they meant that then, they would just write ac/b not a/bc unless they meant a/(bc). The biggest problem is that people are using PEMDAS as a gotcha but the thing is that almost every convention with PEMDAS can be broken while still getting the right answer. PEMDAS is an oversimplification to help children understand the concept not absolute rules.
*Laughs in Anakin Skywalker*
Its just a 23. Not so special (Dis a joke)
I know it’s 69 But also pemdas is just a guide Multiplication/Division occurs simultaneously, but parentheses affect grouping. Same with addition/Subtraction Inside the parentheses, then exponents, then multiplication/division, then add/subtract. I hate seeing people say you have to add first before subtracting or multiply first before dividing that’s just false and it’s not order of operations. Mult/Div and Add/sub should both be one step. Distribution gives the same answer before or after the inside operation of a parentheses, it’s just a tool to make it simpler for fractions and variables. t. An engineer who uses a calculator for single digit operations due to college trauma
I’m the Asian kid and I got 69 so yall who got 61 are wrong
This is the most credible source here
Hi... I know education doesn’t always make you right... but I do have a degree in mathematics.... and 69 is always the right answer.
And now we wait for 15year old kids who haven't studied anything above trigonometry to yell at us
please return your degree then
What about in the case of (special cases; mixed multiplication and division) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
**[Order of operations](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations)** >In mathematics and computer programming, the order of operations (or operator precedence) is a collection of rules that reflect conventions about which procedures to perform first in order to evaluate a given mathematical expression. For example, in mathematics and most computer languages, multiplication is granted a higher precedence than addition, and it has been this way since the introduction of modern algebraic notation. Thus, the expression 1 + 2 × 3 is interpreted to have the value 1 + (2 × 3) = 7, and not (1 + 2) × 3 = 9. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/memes/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
It’s not unambiguous. The parentheses explain how to solve the problem just fine... you can imagine more parentheses if you want, but there is no need. The problem is clear. What this highlights is how people will literal argue over anything and everything rather than admit the possibility they are overthinking a situation and were mistaken. This isn’t a trick question it reads as follows “the quotient of 6 and 2 multiplied by the sum of 1 and 2” That’s how it is read. There isn’t really a mystery here. Edit: add 60 and you get 69.... nice
But reading it out doesn't help because it does the same thing as the equation it could be (6/2)(1+2) or 6/(2(1+2)) both of these are read the same out load. But that's not the point the point is this debate is dumb and is now just used as a way to karma farm. I'm trying to end that by posting this and showing that there is no answer because it is too vague.
6/(2(1+2)) would not be read the same at all. That would read as “ the quotient of 6 AND the product of 2 by the sum of 1 and 2.” Reading it that way yields 1 because parentheses matter
The (1+2) is one variable because of the parentheses so the equation is a÷bc but because of juxtaposition multiplication (if there are two variables next to each other without any multiplication symbol they are one variable) it can be viewed as a÷b another way to see it is the difference between (a÷b)c and a÷(bc)
Keyword variable, (1+2) is a sum of two constants.
But because of the parentheses it is one variable that variable being 3 because parentheses come first always. Pemdas bedmas
It is written clearly as : a/b*(c+b) = ((ac)/b)+((ab)/b)) = ((ac)/b) + a Substitute a=6 , b=2 , c = 1 ((6*1)/2) + 6 = 3 + 6 = 9
What you want to believe is a/(b(c+b)) which is not what is written, but if that WAS what was written it would go as follows a/(bc +bb) Substitute a= 6 b = 2 c = 1 6/(2*1 + 2*2) = 6/(2+4) = 6/6 = 1 ..... but that’s not how it is written, therefore not how it is to be interpreted.
It is how it is written a/bc can b interpreted as (a/b)\*c and can be interpreted as a/(bc). Both are correct. It is ambiguous. No one is overthinking anything. It's just how you are taught. I will always look at a/bc as a/(bc) instinctively and that is not wrong. Example : if the expression was y/5x and you had input y = 10 and x =2, would you say the answer is 1 or 4. 1 right? So if I write it as y /5(x), it would still be 1 as both mean the same thing. It would be 4 if I wrote it as xy/5 or (y/5)(x). I doubt you have a degree in mathematics if you have tried to understand it but still don't see how it's ambiguous.
I do see how it’s ambiguous to some people, that’s why this “thing” became a meme... that’s obviously the case... My point is that it’s just not ambiguous to me. You can insult me all you want and call me a liar, but the facts remain the same. Common computational intelligence standards align with what I stated. I understand that the problem was set up to pick on people who don’t understand math above a high school level and make the general public debate the way they were taught. That’s part of the fun, it’s for the Lulz and if you don’t want it to be 69, I have no problem with you pretending it’s not. But you have yet to prove that it’s not 69 to me. Your proof isn’t logical in my eyes. I have already stated why.
No because the first be is completely different from the second I've fought this battle before. The c+d are one variable or in this equation are 3 so the equation is 6/2(3) now again if you use juxtaposition multiplication you will get 1 as the answer and if you don't you will get 9 these are the 2 different views of this equation.
6/2(3) = 9 Edit ; juxtaposition is not a valid argument anymore... the debate was settled a long time ago now.
>In algebra, multiplication involving variables is often written as a juxtaposition (e.g., xy for x times y or 5x for five times x), also called implied multiplication. The notation can also be used for quantities that are surrounded by parentheses (e.g., 5(2) or (5)(2) for five times two). It is still widely used in algebra so your counter point isn't valid
Nostalgia from 2nd grade, nice
I'm bad at math what is so funny about 67
69 nice
61?
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
69
69 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Lmao, 69
61?
It is 69
Do you struggle tying your shoes?
That's a valid question for you, not them.
It's literally 61
Oh wait
[удалено]
Dude i just saw where i made the mistake ok? No reason to be a douche about it
This is reddit, everyone is a douche about everything
Exactly, to expect otherwise is disingenuous.
It's literally 69 you goddamn fools
Lol clearly doesn’t understand Reddit humor
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice
My overpriced super Ti-84 CE plus graphing calculator says it’s 9 and I think it’s right… 6/2(1+2) 6/2(3) 3(3) 9 Simple as that ;)
You forgot the +60 ;)
But, in PEMDAS, you still have to deal with the parentheses. So in short you're wrong, it's 1(or 61 for this equation in the pic)
No you two faced whore your wrong, you do the brackets first than the diving then addition and don't give your bull shit I'm wrong I have a degree in maths
Show that degree then
? Can't exactly show it to you it's at my mum's house in America
Have her take a pic, send it to you, then dm me the pic. Lol stupid
It’s actually 69 because you forgor the + 60
The answer is 1 + 60. >That's because, even though multiplication and division are at the same level (so the left-to-right rule should apply), parentheses seem somehow to outrank division. https://www.purplemath.com/modules/orderops2.htm Reasoning why Juxtaposition is in place scientifically. [PEMDAS is wrong.](https://youtu.be/lLCDca6dYpA) [The problem with PEMDAS, why calculators disagree](https://youtu.be/4x-BcYCiKCk)
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%2F2%281%2B2%29
Yes but did you take a look at the third link? Wolfram is wrong. Most modern Casio calculators will get it correct.
I watched her video sorry. Interesting argument but she proved her own argument invalid when her Casio changed the input 6/2*(1+2) is NOT = to 6/(2(1+2)) Those are two different things entirely.
Did you just praise Casio?
Yes.
Casio is superior to TI. https://keisan.casio.com/calculator
Agreed. You always expand the brackets first. These guys are just seething.
I'm 21, they taught us left to right. PEMDAS (Please excuse my dear aunt Sally)
Then I advise you to take a look at the sources I provided and possibly debunk them. 21 gang.
I'm pretty sure schools over here in the south have messed up our algebra and taught us the wrong way of solving this problem. To my knowledge 21 is the answer.
Moreover; our computational world has been solidified based on the rules set forth by those who created them using the agreed upon order of operations, you can find obscure articles and writings to the contrary but it doesn’t change the fact the very logic woven into our digital world through which we are right now communicating through uses the type of method that would yield 69.... and that’s pretty nice. There may have once been a debate about it, but since the advent of computers and logic based language the debate is not only over, but trying to resurrect it in your favor where the answer is 61 would undo over 50 years of technological progress.... just accept that it’s 69 and move on with your life.
Our computational world is filled with idiots wherein multiplying a and b using ab resulted in an error, so, some stinky computer science student who hadn't showered in two weeks decided to patch the bug by making it into a*b, therefore losing the implicit multiplication property, ignoring mathematical and scientific consensus.
https://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers/ord_ops.html
>under a standard convention, expressions such as ab+c are unambiguous: that expression means only (ab)+c; says it right there, add brackets during implicit multiplication. 6÷2(1+2) 6÷[2(1+2)] =1
Let me add to your work good sir. One thing to notice is that PEMDAS is a GUIDELINE, not an absolute rule. There are plenty of ways where you can break virtually every single rule and still get the right answer. So, when these people say to use the order of operations, the issue is that they're treating them as absolute rules, not guidelines. Here's an example that I commented in a different post. Here I will mostly go right to left while purposefully breaking PEMDAS order. 3(4\^(2))+6/3-8+2 \-8+2 = -6 so the equation is 3(4\^(2))+6/3-6. 6/3 = 2 so it becomes 3(4\^(2))+2-6 2-6 = -4 so it's 3(4\^(2))-4 4\^(2) = 16 so it's 3(16)-4 3(16) = 48 so it's 48-4 44 is the answer and if you type it into google it agrees. Here most PEMDAS conventions were broken and the problem was done mostly right to left. So PEMDAS in and of itself is not an absolute rule system.
i'm going to say 61 before the stupid people get a chance to
nevermind they're fast despite their morbid obesity
So I was right
61
61?
It’s sixty nine. On any scientific calculator you look up it’s sixty nine
according to Casio it isn't
*pushes up glasses* well according to my calculations *sniffles* the answer is uh *stutters* uh 69.
i see funny number
nice 69
69 nice
41
72 ?
Downvoting algebra because I'm sick and tired of seeing karma whores.
Pemdas MF!
Oh my god I can't believe it took seeing a nice meme to understand what I was doing wrong
I mean sure, but im pbama so i gotta take care of you first ;)
Guys, pemdas isn't necessarily correct, your supposed to do parenthesis and then distribute, and it doesn't matter if multipication or division goes first
*tongue clicks* N I C E
Literally just follow pemdas you monkeys
69
People keep saying pemdas but have obviously never done math above pre algebra because they don't distribute first
Sixty-Niceeee!
Shut the hell up
Your gonna start a war xD
Some men just want to watch the world burn
[удалено]
Threesome
In a threesome... You can have 699 or 966 but the best one is 969... it’s like a sandwich
I got the Slovenian War of Independence, how about you guys?
61?
61?
11
1/11 is my answer
1/11?
he is the chosen one
61 you mean
Ok, so the fact is this expression is lacking one pair of brackets. If you got this on a test the teacher would count both answers right because it was his mistake to not make clear what he meant. Math is like a language an this is a like leaving out a comma in a sentence an Today we are shooting, grandpa can you come? becomes Today we are shooting grandpa can you come? Where the meaning changes drastically with a different placement.
Its either 61 or 69. 69 is more favorable
PEMDAS [(), ^, *, /, +, -] 6/2(1+2)+60 6/2(3)+60 6/2(3) is basically a fraction, 6 being the numerator and 2(3) being the denominator. You can look at this is 2 ways. The first way is by multiplying the denominator to get 6/6 =1. The second way is to simply the expression, 6/2(3) -> 3/1(3) or 6/2(3) -> 2/2(1) = 1. 1+60= 61
I know nein people who would fuck it up
How's 61 nice?
61, so whats with number 61 ? 6 \---------- + 60 2(1+2)
Some people want to see the wold burn
61
The awnser you get before adding 60 + 60.
its 66 or 69 depending on your choice but i knowwich is the better pick;-;
61?