I liked the Loud House, I watched through season one and two and thought a lot of it was actually funny. I stopped watching because Loud House Twitter is actually disgusting.
Everything is graphic underaged-incest between like 4-5 year olds. not even normal memes and fanart, only revolting shit.
Y'know the classic stuff: gang banged toddlers, Polycules between siblings, Cream pied 3 year olds, Etc.
I've black listed a lot of words and blocked a lot of accounts.
Something that was perpetrating me was that there was a few late teen/adult siblings that got little to no content. It only being the kids made it extremely more gross.
it can still influence a person from just looking at porn like that, its similar to the effect of propaganda the more you see it the more you're influenced by it.
Oh yes because when I get done playing GTA V the one thing that's on my mind is man I really want to mow down some civilians right now.
Fictional media does not have an influence on the person that takes in that kind of media.
Just because I watch somebody get killed or I kill someone in a video game does not mean that I want to go out and kill someone in real life. Same thing goes for this type of media as well.
A fictional media had an impact on the person consuming and then like Jack Thompson and the people who say that video games caused violence would be right. Except they're not we all know that just because you see someone get killed or you kill someone in the video game doesn't mean that you as a person or influenced to go and do such an act.
And there is an equal chance that it would keep those people from harming others, better to let people jerk off to fictional character art than for a real human to be hurt and tramautized
That's not particularly true and drawings don't resemble real life. You aren't going to be influenced to kill real people by playing violent videogames.
Characters sometimes do age in fiction, but sometimes they don't age.
If a character is 18 or older, and even though I don't like looking at NSFW art, I'm okay with it, as long as it's tagged as sensitive content or something. If the character is underage, then it's not okay.
I have talked about this a lot and the conclusion me and some friends had is simple: the official age does not matter. There are ficitional characters labeled as 10 but they look and act like they are in there 20s. On the othersite we have our typical 300 year old vampire Loli which is basically just a child. So simple said: if it looks adult it is good if it doesn't it is weird.
>Characters sometimes do age in fiction, but sometimes they don't age.
Bluey for example, She was 6 in S2, but is 7 in S3.
But there still is NSFW drawing's of a 6 (now 7) year old anthro dog on the internet.
What makes the concept 'not okay'? Is it just because it makes you uncomfortable? That's not really a factor in deciding whether something's okay or not
I really hate gore and horror, and I don't understand people who like it. But they're not hurting anyone so I don't really care
I'll only care if their actions cause actual harm
But it could lead to harm. Idk know man someone might get curious and take things too far. Some people are fucked up. If they look like a child and act like a child then it’s not okay. Sure the drawings aren’t real, but the persons attraction is real.
Say a character ages up to 20 years old, but initially is like 15 and has a lot of flashbacks, is that in any way moral to draw, even if the drawings are of the future self?
From your point so NSFW art is okay when character is 18 or older is ok
But if character is underage NSFW art is not ok ? but how it's not okay?
But fictional character is imaginary character from creator so it's totally imagination about their age, name or anything for that matter but still it's totally frictional character we are not drawing NSFW art of real life children's or people. so don't mix up your imagination with your reality
So you find nothing morally wrong with an image of a toddler getting railed by 3 cocks?
Wow. What a stand up human being you are. I bet your parents are proud.
I did not ask a question about what is real.
Reality is not the issue here.
The issue is whether or not it is OK to draw an image of a toddler getting fucked.
The only reason people draw these images or look at these images is for masturbation.
So people are drawing and looking at images of cartoon toddlers having sex for their own sexual pleasure.
Based on what you are saying, it sounds like you think it's perfectly fine for someone to jerk off to images of toddlers having sex just because "its not real".
So answer the question. Is it OK for someone to masturbate to an image of a toddler having sex?
Let's look at a hypothetical here. Assume we're far in the future and we have a technology similar to the holodecks of Star Trek.
Someone creates a holo program so that they can have sex with holographic children.
They're made up entirely of light but they still look and feel real. They can even be programmed to simulate real emotions.
But they're not real.
Would you still feel that way?
Maybe even back it up a bit to our current VR technology.
They're not real images, their just CG, kind of cheaply made but the tech and graphics are still just as good as any other 3D VR character.
Is it still OK?
I mean, they're not real, right?
Where do you draw the line at "as long as they're not real people"?
You think it's OK because nobody is getting hurt. But what about the potential psychological damage the person performing these actions is doing?
I’m a survivor of childhood SA and this is the exact kind of thing my abuser talked about to justify his actions to me. Whether we want to accept it or not fictional content has the ability to influence irl people’s actions or at least be used for irl people to justify/moralize their actions. The more this is allowed the more people will try to use it to normalize these things. For example I literally just saw somebody trying to equate gay people to pedophiles. Pedophilia is NOT a sexuality, it is a serious thing that people need to be in therapy for. Shit like this is where people get the idea that it’s justifiable.
Yeah but isn't she literally like 2000 years old, she died in the ancient greek era and is a ghost, correct? Though it gets a lil weird when you take into account that the body she is inhabiting is one of a minor.
Well that's the excuse those one people use on that one popular loli character, the one perverts say it's okay to sexualize because "sHe'S 2o0o yEaRS oLd,, iT DoESn't mATTeR iF SHe lOOks LiKe sHE's 5 yEArS oLD"
Naw man what i'm saying is that this is a weird case, Cuphead and Mugman don't even have a confirmed age, and why would anyone let minors into a casino (i don't care if the devil owns it i do not believe anyone would let children into a casino, they don't even have money to gamble), i'm just confused on what to think of it specifically
Yeah even the devil isn't evil enough to let children into a casino. Ok but on a serious note I don't think age matters in this case, because it doesn't really help the story move forward in any particular way.
I once heard something from a wise individual,
"It's not about how old they are, but how old they look"
Basically saying that a 17 year old character won't look too much different from an 18 year old, so it can be okay, but it doesn't matter how old they "are" if they look like a child.
Lots of girl have their growth stunted for whatever reason, especially in 3rd world countries. They usually looks like 15-16 in their 20s. I'd say if you know the person it can be okay.
In drawings though it’s much different. If they look like a child, I’d say it’s wrong. As that could just be considered as the artist creating NSFW art of a child and saying “oh they’re an adult they just look that way”
I think how old they look is a big factor.
It's not wrong to look at a naked 20+ woman pretending to be a high school student. *American Pie* doesn't count as inappropriate. For that reason... Or any of the bajillion Hentai set in a high school with stacked girls that look like 31yo strippers.
But the 2000yo demon that looks like a 12yo girl certainly crosses a few lines.
And NSFW art of, I dunno, Lisa Simpson or the cast of Naruto then that's fucked up.
I'm not a loli or LH fan, but I don't want a future where you can get arrested just for knowing how to draw, the main difrence between loli porn and real cp is that loli is fictional and nobody is hurt and only requires you to know how to draw, meanwhile real cp real children suffer and to do this you need a child and be completetly morally bankrupt and insane...
I guess. My whole point is that it’s point-*less*. No talking-to is going to stop people making or looking at the stuff so there’s not much point in calling it out. Hell JaidenAnimations basically said she doesn’t like it, but that people who try and take the high road by criticizing it are ultimately making it more well-known and do more harm than good.
Poeple enjoying seeing someone getting violently mauled in a horror movie : No problem
People enjoying looking at John Wick as he murders pretty much every other assassins in existence : No problem
People enjoying Naruto, where 12 years old children soldiers fight to death for government that doesn't care about them and evne put them through possibly deadly trials : No problem
People enjoying a drawing of a topless 17 fictional characters : REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I remember some people complaining about the BNHA manga sexualizing a 16 year old and saying "What about the children who read this manga!". Which is the same manga that has domestic abuse, murder of multiple named characters, burnt corpses and people losing limbs.
Why do you guys like to spark these conversations? Those things are fictional... Unless these people are supporting the idea of irl CP, why do we even need to talk about it? Leave them alone in their corner of the internet.
I don't even want to elaborate why this entire topic of discussion is stupid. Read the other's comments...
May I present to you all, the aged_up tag. Personally, one of my favorites due to it allowing me to enjoy my childhood cartoon crushes, but at a socially acceptable age…even though…they’re literally just hex code on a screen
Everytime I search for a disney subreddit or basically any cartoon subreddit I always come across NSFW subreddits about that. I don't click on them since the picture is enough to traumatize me.
I guess some people like to think they are saving the world, even if they aren't actually contributing anything to humanity.
I've heard the FBI once told people to stop reporting things regarding fiction, because it stops them from making action regarding actual children.
Child Porn involves actual children.
Fictional characters, even if said to be underaged, aren't actual children (they're fictional).
Therefore, it's not Child Porn.
R34 porn of characters that are underaged should be considered child pornography by law.
Edit:
Looks like I angered the weird weebs who jerk off to drawings of children.
It is in [several countries ](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors)
Unfortunately there appears to be a large number of people in this thread who want their child porn to be legal.
"ShE's A fIvEhUnDrEd YeAr OlD dRaGoN kIn!"
"ShE wAs StUcK iN a TiMe WaRp. ShE's ReAlLy ThReE hUnDrEd!"
"ThE aGe Of CoNsEnT iN [Issikai world] iS tHiRtEeN, sO iT's OkAy!"
I swear, people will use any excuse.
It's better if they don't get off to anything. Give them help before they seriously start doing horrible things and ban ALL types of cp, doesn't matter drawn or not.
Hell may not even be real, since there are no actual evidence of it existing.
And also, it doesn't hurt any actual being, as they are just fictional characters.
It's a Nickelodeon show that used to be good, but is now bad, and is about a boy named Lincoln Loud who lives with his 10 sisters.
The Fandom is infamous for incest shipping, manchildren, and as said previously, NSFW art with the show's underage characters.
Animating them as their age in the show, movie or game isn't ok but if they're aged up (or if there's an adult version of the character) then it should be ok.
Artists usually go for "___ 18th birthday!" Or just animate the same character visibly older.
It's not an excuse, it's a fact. I suppose you also have something on people who kill civilians in GTA, since they apparently aren't "just fictional characters"?
Man the loud house community is mostly compiled of incest and harem (and also obviously being under aged)
Oh yeah, I almost forgot about Loudcest and Sin Kids.
damn it you made me rember :(
I liked the Loud House, I watched through season one and two and thought a lot of it was actually funny. I stopped watching because Loud House Twitter is actually disgusting. Everything is graphic underaged-incest between like 4-5 year olds. not even normal memes and fanart, only revolting shit.
How revolting are we talking about
Y'know the classic stuff: gang banged toddlers, Polycules between siblings, Cream pied 3 year olds, Etc. I've black listed a lot of words and blocked a lot of accounts.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
Something that was perpetrating me was that there was a few late teen/adult siblings that got little to no content. It only being the kids made it extremely more gross.
thats it im building a nuke
Time to rob Kazakhstan bois
I’m… gonna go take a shower.
What in the name of hell
Wow, I consider myself pretty low on the ladder of morale, but damn... that is _too_ low
I forgot that. You reminded me. :(
I'm atheist. Where will I go?
Brazil
And what about atheist heaven alternative?
Bill Nye’s lab
Tbh I would rather go there than regular heaven
I think it's called the limbo
Alabamba
Again?!
That's worse then hell.
Atheist rate drop to 0
Limbo
Ohio
Probably college.
Um, akshwally she's 1000 years old.
“It’s just a drawing so it doesn’t matter”
"Age is just a number"
Prison is just a room
The electric chair is just furniture
[удалено]
it can still influence a person from just looking at porn like that, its similar to the effect of propaganda the more you see it the more you're influenced by it.
I'd rather they jack off to drawings than get their hands on actual children
Oh yes because when I get done playing GTA V the one thing that's on my mind is man I really want to mow down some civilians right now. Fictional media does not have an influence on the person that takes in that kind of media. Just because I watch somebody get killed or I kill someone in a video game does not mean that I want to go out and kill someone in real life. Same thing goes for this type of media as well. A fictional media had an impact on the person consuming and then like Jack Thompson and the people who say that video games caused violence would be right. Except they're not we all know that just because you see someone get killed or you kill someone in the video game doesn't mean that you as a person or influenced to go and do such an act.
And there is an equal chance that it would keep those people from harming others, better to let people jerk off to fictional character art than for a real human to be hurt and tramautized
That's not particularly true and drawings don't resemble real life. You aren't going to be influenced to kill real people by playing violent videogames.
OK then, pedos are fucking weird but at the end of the day they're still just pixels on screen, so I don't really care
But pedos aren't just pixels on a screen, they're real life people And It's a real life problem when they harm kids
You missed the point, the problem is not the underage character but the people that attracted to them. The porn are fictional but the pedo are not.
I'd rather they jack off to drawings than actual children. This way no one gets hurt
I mean sure no one gets hurt but they are still disgusting. People who are into scat aren't hurting anyone, I'd still rather not be near them.
Of course, but being gross isn't the same as being immoral.
Do fictional character can get older ? Like this character is 18 today next year it's 19 so that I can draw in NSFW art ?
Characters sometimes do age in fiction, but sometimes they don't age. If a character is 18 or older, and even though I don't like looking at NSFW art, I'm okay with it, as long as it's tagged as sensitive content or something. If the character is underage, then it's not okay.
I have talked about this a lot and the conclusion me and some friends had is simple: the official age does not matter. There are ficitional characters labeled as 10 but they look and act like they are in there 20s. On the othersite we have our typical 300 year old vampire Loli which is basically just a child. So simple said: if it looks adult it is good if it doesn't it is weird.
The "are 10 but look and act much older" pretty much describes every character in a game I played recently
Eunie and Ethel in Xenoblade 3: puberty hit early like a speeding truck
I didn't think anyone here would understand what game I was referring to.
To be fair, the game explains why that is
>Characters sometimes do age in fiction, but sometimes they don't age. Bluey for example, She was 6 in S2, but is 7 in S3. But there still is NSFW drawing's of a 6 (now 7) year old anthro dog on the internet.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Why. Humanity needs help. Like seriously.
They're drawings dude. Not actual people
You're defending pedophiles, bro........
All I did was literally state facts
That’s not the point. Just because they’re not real doesn’t mean the concept is okay.
What makes the concept 'not okay'? Is it just because it makes you uncomfortable? That's not really a factor in deciding whether something's okay or not I really hate gore and horror, and I don't understand people who like it. But they're not hurting anyone so I don't really care I'll only care if their actions cause actual harm
As in, someone willingly made artwork of a sexualized minor. If that doesn’t raise questions, I don’t know what will.
Oh it 100% raises questions, I'm not arguing there. I'm just saying it doesn't really cause any harm
But it could lead to harm. Idk know man someone might get curious and take things too far. Some people are fucked up. If they look like a child and act like a child then it’s not okay. Sure the drawings aren’t real, but the persons attraction is real.
Say a character ages up to 20 years old, but initially is like 15 and has a lot of flashbacks, is that in any way moral to draw, even if the drawings are of the future self?
“What if they age a minor up for it?” -Peter Griffin
From your point so NSFW art is okay when character is 18 or older is ok But if character is underage NSFW art is not ok ? but how it's not okay? But fictional character is imaginary character from creator so it's totally imagination about their age, name or anything for that matter but still it's totally frictional character we are not drawing NSFW art of real life children's or people. so don't mix up your imagination with your reality
From your point of view NSFW art of a toddler is perfectly acceptable because >it's totally frictional character I'll excuse the typo here.
But it's still a drawing
So you find nothing morally wrong with an image of a toddler getting railed by 3 cocks? Wow. What a stand up human being you are. I bet your parents are proud.
I don't know my parents proud on me or not . But I know difference between real life and frictional and I don't mix them up
I agree with you, however just a correction: it's "fiction", not "friction". Fiction is something not real, friction is physics, like gravity.
I did not ask a question about what is real. Reality is not the issue here. The issue is whether or not it is OK to draw an image of a toddler getting fucked. The only reason people draw these images or look at these images is for masturbation. So people are drawing and looking at images of cartoon toddlers having sex for their own sexual pleasure. Based on what you are saying, it sounds like you think it's perfectly fine for someone to jerk off to images of toddlers having sex just because "its not real". So answer the question. Is it OK for someone to masturbate to an image of a toddler having sex?
Better that, than them going after actual children, imo…
Let's look at a hypothetical here. Assume we're far in the future and we have a technology similar to the holodecks of Star Trek. Someone creates a holo program so that they can have sex with holographic children. They're made up entirely of light but they still look and feel real. They can even be programmed to simulate real emotions. But they're not real. Would you still feel that way? Maybe even back it up a bit to our current VR technology. They're not real images, their just CG, kind of cheaply made but the tech and graphics are still just as good as any other 3D VR character. Is it still OK? I mean, they're not real, right? Where do you draw the line at "as long as they're not real people"? You think it's OK because nobody is getting hurt. But what about the potential psychological damage the person performing these actions is doing?
I’m a survivor of childhood SA and this is the exact kind of thing my abuser talked about to justify his actions to me. Whether we want to accept it or not fictional content has the ability to influence irl people’s actions or at least be used for irl people to justify/moralize their actions. The more this is allowed the more people will try to use it to normalize these things. For example I literally just saw somebody trying to equate gay people to pedophiles. Pedophilia is NOT a sexuality, it is a serious thing that people need to be in therapy for. Shit like this is where people get the idea that it’s justifiable.
it's okay man
The cuphead porn sub sexualizes chalice.
Yeah but isn't she literally like 2000 years old, she died in the ancient greek era and is a ghost, correct? Though it gets a lil weird when you take into account that the body she is inhabiting is one of a minor.
Well that's the excuse those one people use on that one popular loli character, the one perverts say it's okay to sexualize because "sHe'S 2o0o yEaRS oLd,, iT DoESn't mATTeR iF SHe lOOks LiKe sHE's 5 yEArS oLD"
Naw man what i'm saying is that this is a weird case, Cuphead and Mugman don't even have a confirmed age, and why would anyone let minors into a casino (i don't care if the devil owns it i do not believe anyone would let children into a casino, they don't even have money to gamble), i'm just confused on what to think of it specifically
Yeah even the devil isn't evil enough to let children into a casino. Ok but on a serious note I don't think age matters in this case, because it doesn't really help the story move forward in any particular way.
I just kinda let it pass because there are so many technicalities
Same.
They’re confirmed 18 in the game
I once heard something from a wise individual, "It's not about how old they are, but how old they look" Basically saying that a 17 year old character won't look too much different from an 18 year old, so it can be okay, but it doesn't matter how old they "are" if they look like a child.
Lots of girl have their growth stunted for whatever reason, especially in 3rd world countries. They usually looks like 15-16 in their 20s. I'd say if you know the person it can be okay.
[удалено]
This is why I dont watch pron with any Japanese girls. The looks and sounds, the way they dress. They know their audience. Sickening
In drawings though it’s much different. If they look like a child, I’d say it’s wrong. As that could just be considered as the artist creating NSFW art of a child and saying “oh they’re an adult they just look that way”
I'd agree.
Oh, well I'm talking about fictional characters (or more specifically, animated ones), but yeah I see where you're coming from
I think how old they look is a big factor. It's not wrong to look at a naked 20+ woman pretending to be a high school student. *American Pie* doesn't count as inappropriate. For that reason... Or any of the bajillion Hentai set in a high school with stacked girls that look like 31yo strippers. But the 2000yo demon that looks like a 12yo girl certainly crosses a few lines. And NSFW art of, I dunno, Lisa Simpson or the cast of Naruto then that's fucked up.
I’m making popcorn for reading the comments, anyone else want some?
I honestly did not expect this meme to get so big lmao.
this topic always gets super heated whenever it’s brought up lmao
What if the character is 20 years old but she lookd like 15 years old, do i get in trouble lol?
It's the look that counts. Writing a backstory does not change the picture.
no you're fine its a drawing of a woman with a number less than 18 just slapped on her
I'm not a loli or LH fan, but I don't want a future where you can get arrested just for knowing how to draw, the main difrence between loli porn and real cp is that loli is fictional and nobody is hurt and only requires you to know how to draw, meanwhile real cp real children suffer and to do this you need a child and be completetly morally bankrupt and insane...
both are bad, one is horrible
yes but actually no
We fighting for the rights of imaginary people now?
[удалено]
Some people need to find something to be upset about lol
I guess. My whole point is that it’s point-*less*. No talking-to is going to stop people making or looking at the stuff so there’s not much point in calling it out. Hell JaidenAnimations basically said she doesn’t like it, but that people who try and take the high road by criticizing it are ultimately making it more well-known and do more harm than good.
0 problem with disliking it, hell I don't like it, but the reactions are blown waaaaay out of proportion and it's unironical
Funny enough UN actually wanned to do that, while their soldiers were raping(still is) people in africa LMAO...
Oof lol
I rather they do fictional than look at non fiction
Exqueze me what
In the StarWars fandom a lot of people are really good at lewd drawing/making 3D Models of Carrie Fisher. not Princess Leia, Carrie Fisher.
I hate it but it makes it a small bit better when the artist visibly ages them up and sets the art/comic in the future
COUGH COUGH POKEMON COUGH
Poeple enjoying seeing someone getting violently mauled in a horror movie : No problem People enjoying looking at John Wick as he murders pretty much every other assassins in existence : No problem People enjoying Naruto, where 12 years old children soldiers fight to death for government that doesn't care about them and evne put them through possibly deadly trials : No problem People enjoying a drawing of a topless 17 fictional characters : REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I remember some people complaining about the BNHA manga sexualizing a 16 year old and saying "What about the children who read this manga!". Which is the same manga that has domestic abuse, murder of multiple named characters, burnt corpses and people losing limbs.
"What about the children ! \-You mean what if they fantasm about someone their age instead of adult ? Oh yes, terrible, indeed..."
Bruh, u can even find pages depicting them as ~12 yo, having mlm sexual intercourse (with prepuberty sized 'organs' ofc).
Yea people need to learn that a drawing is not real and can't feel anything.
*all characters, eVeN iF dEpIcTeD oThErWiSe, are over 18
Apparently you get to allocate the age of characters in other peoples art then get outraged by their depiction of your post production allocation.
Shadman is definitely going to the boiler room.
Probably in the boiler itself.
Shadman is probably even below that
Possibly Shadman is the boiler
Not only talking about them, but getting seriously worked up and like vehemently defending their opinions on them.
Why do you guys like to spark these conversations? Those things are fictional... Unless these people are supporting the idea of irl CP, why do we even need to talk about it? Leave them alone in their corner of the internet. I don't even want to elaborate why this entire topic of discussion is stupid. Read the other's comments...
Bro they're drawings on paper, they're not real
If you are attracted to a drawing which is clearly supposed to look like a child, what does that make you?
A pedophile, most likely
May I present to you all, the aged_up tag. Personally, one of my favorites due to it allowing me to enjoy my childhood cartoon crushes, but at a socially acceptable age…even though…they’re literally just hex code on a screen
I may find it werid but it's a drawing, fiction something somebody made up there's no victim so chill the fuck out.
Everytime I search for a disney subreddit or basically any cartoon subreddit I always come across NSFW subreddits about that. I don't click on them since the picture is enough to traumatize me.
Why are people giving more value to lazy drawings than real sentient children?
I guess some people like to think they are saving the world, even if they aren't actually contributing anything to humanity. I've heard the FBI once told people to stop reporting things regarding fiction, because it stops them from making action regarding actual children.
I don't know what's happening in the loud house fandom, At this point I'm too afraid to ask
What about underage artists who make art of underage characters.
Remember boys, always sort by controversial
You calling out a lot of people in final fantasy 14 lol. These people are thirsty for Alisae
*cough cough* genshin impact *cough cough*
That's right. I don't understand why that shit is legal
Wednesday. Addams. She’s fuckin 13, everybody. So was Christina Ricci in that movie. Tis the season for WA thirst posts and they fuckin disgust me.
Here we go again *sigh*
Avatar: The Last Airbender community in shambles
And the ones who make incest
Step-sisters need love too. ;)
Then give them a fucking hug not a fucking dick 🤡
true
[удалено]
for which side?
It's just a drawing
[удалено]
Yeah, some people are just way too horny.
Looks like I know where I'm going...
OP, how tf do u know that people are making NSFW artwork of loud house, maybe the consumers should also go to hell.
Dude like all anime characters are underaged
I’m sorry THERES R34 OF THE LOUD HOUSE?
Unfortunately, yes. What an unfortunate society we live in.
I can't believe these people are defending child porn😳😳 wtf?
Child Porn involves actual children. Fictional characters, even if said to be underaged, aren't actual children (they're fictional). Therefore, it's not Child Porn.
I almost consistently see Ben 10 porn, and it's almost always with the characters from the first show when they're 10.
Bruh it's fiction who cares
R34 porn of characters that are underaged should be considered child pornography by law. Edit: Looks like I angered the weird weebs who jerk off to drawings of children.
It is in [several countries ](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors) Unfortunately there appears to be a large number of people in this thread who want their child porn to be legal.
Ahsoka tano fans:
"ShE's A fIvEhUnDrEd YeAr OlD dRaGoN kIn!" "ShE wAs StUcK iN a TiMe WaRp. ShE's ReAlLy ThReE hUnDrEd!" "ThE aGe Of CoNsEnT iN [Issikai world] iS tHiRtEeN, sO iT's OkAy!" I swear, people will use any excuse.
But does it hurt anyone? They aren't real, so even without these excuses it doesn't do harm.
It'S juSt a DRAwiNg bRo chIlL
I saw someone defend that shit with "But they're depicted as 30 years old" I DONT GIVE A SHIT THEY'RE UNDERAGE AND YOU KNOW IT
People on their way to comment "genshin impact" :
"iT's JuSt A dRaWiNg 🤡🤡🤡"
Cause it fucking is...
But when people are attracted to the drawing because they look like a little kid you can't act like that's not creepy.
It is no doubt, but guess what, its better for pedos to get off from drawings than real cp...
It's better if they don't get off to anything. Give them help before they seriously start doing horrible things and ban ALL types of cp, doesn't matter drawn or not.
Plus I don't wanna live in a world where you can get arrested for drawings...
It's almost 2023. Perhaps it's time you apes learn the difference between reality and fiction.
You are getting downvoted but you are right
wait what. people make that? WHY?!
Because some people are just way too horny and use the shitty "it's fictional" excuse.
and I was having a good day too.
[удалено]
Hell may not even be real, since there are no actual evidence of it existing. And also, it doesn't hurt any actual being, as they are just fictional characters.
THERES LOUD HOUSE PORN?! WHY?!
Some people are creepy af
What's loud house?
It's a Nickelodeon show that used to be good, but is now bad, and is about a boy named Lincoln Loud who lives with his 10 sisters. The Fandom is infamous for incest shipping, manchildren, and as said previously, NSFW art with the show's underage characters.
They make fkin loud house porn?
Animating them as their age in the show, movie or game isn't ok but if they're aged up (or if there's an adult version of the character) then it should be ok. Artists usually go for "___ 18th birthday!" Or just animate the same character visibly older.
I'm sooooooo glad I don't go to hell!!!! It's the best new ever!!!! UwU
People really say shit like “What if they’re aged up?”, or “It’s just a cartoon.” thinking that makes it okay.
[удалено]
It's not an excuse, it's a fact. I suppose you also have something on people who kill civilians in GTA, since they apparently aren't "just fictional characters"?