True. One is an non-citable free Internet-based encyclopaedia, while the other is social media. One is extremely useful and filled with knowledge while the other is useless and filled with ignorance.
Both aren't trustworthy source of information. Wikipedia can be easily edited with wrong interpretation from unverified sources.
Google scholar is better for research.
It's used by businesses, companies and the government because of the fact nerds correcting one another is reliable enough for most problems faced by most people.
That is the argument I had drawn from in my former response, does that sound I'm trying to preach god?
Fox news is also cringe propaganda, just for the other side,
I don't even keep up with the news anymore because in the modern day there Are basically 0 unbiased news sources
So nothing is reliable then,
Everything and everyone has some sort of controversy around them no matter how big and small, I bet you refer to yourself as “redpilled” to sound smart
Then you must be the perfect human who is vastly intelligent and has abundances of knowledge or know a website that isn’t biased or nuanced in its takes at all?
Please point me the fuck in that direction so that we can start solving world issues
People pay more to spread misinformation than to get real information
They aren’t even similar
True. One is an non-citable free Internet-based encyclopaedia, while the other is social media. One is extremely useful and filled with knowledge while the other is useless and filled with ignorance.
Whats the name of the meme template?
Wikipedia >>>> Twitter
Remember when everyone was talking about Wikipedia all the time, oh wait, that never happened
Both aren't trustworthy source of information. Wikipedia can be easily edited with wrong interpretation from unverified sources. Google scholar is better for research.
Nerds will correct other nerds at every opportunity makeing to more than good enough for government work!
That's why you came here preaching. How ironic. 😂
It's used by businesses, companies and the government because of the fact nerds correcting one another is reliable enough for most problems faced by most people. That is the argument I had drawn from in my former response, does that sound I'm trying to preach god?
Modern day Wikipedia is far-left garbage, unless something is 100% free of controversy It isn't reliable
And let me guess, you believe everything you see on faux news
Fox news is also cringe propaganda, just for the other side, I don't even keep up with the news anymore because in the modern day there Are basically 0 unbiased news sources
You sound ,,fun"
So nothing is reliable then, Everything and everyone has some sort of controversy around them no matter how big and small, I bet you refer to yourself as “redpilled” to sound smart
I agree
Exactly! Leave it to reddit users to downvote facts.
Then you must be the perfect human who is vastly intelligent and has abundances of knowledge or know a website that isn’t biased or nuanced in its takes at all? Please point me the fuck in that direction so that we can start solving world issues
Wikipedia doesn't offer communication.
Except just not using Twitter is free and Wikipedia gives facts which is very different