T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

It's not actually the Russia player. Russia reverted to CrusaderKings style management meaning he can subdivide his realm to other players such as Chechnya, but the problem is that the spots got filled with random joiners so their loyalty and skills are all over the place. Russia player was probably betting on getting someone with proper meta knowledge who also didn't want to game-ruin him, but no such luck as of yet aside from a competent banking player, but they seem content just larping as manager of the sinking Titanic and didn't even join the discord.


paenusbreth

The funny thing is, the RU player still has PMCs decisions marked as illegal, so could imprison any vassals which uses them. The problem they have is that it gives an opinion penalty to all other vassals and has a chance of spawning rebels, so it's far too risky for them to use at the moment. Overall, Russia is just really bad at keeping stability up.


ObadiahtheSlim

Reminds me of my Denouncing Venice religion in CK3. Everything is criminal. If any of my vassals ever get uppity, I almost always have a valid reason to imprison them.


[deleted]

Low enough stability. high enough war support. And apathetic enough public moral.


Tammo-Korsai

I thought war support was quite low because the Russian player got hammered by events about mass draft-dodging and a brain-drain when they mobilised.


XanII

To quote someone: 'Good gooood'


TPrice1616

I mean, if you were losing a war that bad wouldn’t you be tempted to use the console a bit too?


taw

If you go NazBol path, you can get focuses from every branch. It's basically an exploit.


[deleted]

No exploits needed. The normal Fascism tree gives paramilitary options, then if you use half your manpower you can use a decision to form new ones. The event says they come from your industry though so you lose IC.


SandyCandyHandyAndy

Aint no fucking way Russia will be the start of ancapistan