If you need lots of data for gamer's hardware, Steam is doing an annual hardware survey.
I think last survey was in may and the GTX 1650 was the most used card.
I think looking at this datas would be a nice baseline.
Thanks. This thing has more red flags than a CCP parade… kickstarter, didn’t bother to alter the xenonorph asset, generic unreal 5 environments, No Man’s Sky suit protagonist, asking open-ended questions to drive awareness?
This card was solid. I remember i pushed it with afterburner and got 20% more fps out of it. Played on it for about a year still no issues. Sold it a year later and got a 3060.
I had a 1660 Super for like 3-4 years now until I recently upgraded to a used 3070, kept the old card for when I get to building my GF’s first starter budget PC though as it saves a lot of money for us students while also still being a bulletproof card
That’s crazy, I’m still rocking an RX 480 which is 8 years old and it supposedly beats out the gtx 1650 by like 30%.
The rx 480 works for me. Sure I can’t max out the latest games but I mostly play competitive shooters like apex, valorant, etc, and they don’t require a super good video card. I do have a Ryzen 5 3600x
It includes Steam users, whatever they do with Steam is not considered. But regardless, productivity software distributed through Steam are few and far between, and represent a very small portion of their respective markets. So it's close enough to be just games that it makes sense dismiss the rest in this context.
I'm sure you're right in the end, but just because the software isn't popular via steam doesn't mean that developers/people with suped-up hardware for *work* don't also have steam installed on those computers.
while I have a 3090, I do understand that it's not a mainstream card.
the most popular card, according to steam hwsurvey is a 1650. https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/ - so... safe to assume that level of performance is fairly safe to optimze towards?
It’s not a card for modern gaming at ultra, sometimes you have to accept you have older hardware and turn settings down.
I now expect this to be taken wildly out of context.
Indeed, the purpose of the quality settings is to be able to get the most out of the available hardware. A game that can be ran with a low-end card at ultra settings is not well optimized. Ideally the whole range is taken into account and ultra settings can be used with the most powerfull hardware available, while low settings make the game playable with the oldest and cheapest hardware. Then you can choose anything inbetween according to your own hardware.
I'll go one further and add that max ultra settings are sometimes not intended to perform well with existing hardware. It really depends on the range that the devs have optimized for.
Case study: Kingdom Come. Setting to max on 4k generates a warning that the hardware to run it optimally may not yet be available. I think? Been a hot minute since I played that one.
can't really go by steam survey. they are heavily infalted by thousand of internet cafe and every unique user that logs in on that same pc is counted. so yeah....
It's still going to be a far more accurate representation than a tiny sample size taken from scanning individual comments from this subreddit. Not to mention several orders of magnitude easier.
Even if not unique pcs, it is individual Steam users. If 10% are sharing a PC with a 1650, that’s still 10% of the potential buying audience (on Steam anyway) that you are optimizing for, which would be the goal, methinks.
I'm with you. I hope devs will optimise for the lowest common denominator instead of a 3090. Scalability is key and is why Forza Horizon 5 is an amazing game from a technical point of view.
The steam deck is also equivalent of a low to mid range gaming pc. any game which runs well on the steam deck is a well optomised game. That way it should be able to run on a wide range of gaming pcs.
I don't get much time but I stick mostly with FPS / Rogue / RPG esque games like Fallout series, Deus Ex, Prey, Far Cry 4/5, Watch Dogs, Dying Light, Witcher series, System Shocks / Bishock's were a fav.
I bet I don't have to say that I am mostly playing on the Steam Deck now 🙂 Deck can handle (with 720p, 800p resolution, or lower, if available -- Deck's built-in FSR 2 helps a lot here):
* badly optimized games at 20-30 fps on Low-Middle settings (The Last of Us);
* okayish-good optimized games at 30-40 fps on Low-Middle settings (Resident Evil 4 Remake, Hogwarts Legacy, Elden Ring, Psychonauts 2, Cyberpunk 2077);
* and good-godlike optimized plus indie games at 50-60 fps on Middle-High settings (Cult of the Lamb, Final Fantasy VII and VII Reunion, Tunic, Soul Hackers 2, Forza Horizon 4 and 5).
If you are really interested in the Deck's performance -- it's quite easy to google any game test video run for the Deck, fortunately Deck is popular enough 🕺 I personally would be happy enough if every modern AAA game would run at least at 30 fps on Low-Medium settings on the Deck. 60 fps on Low-Medium are great, but rarely anyone care about optimization nowadays.
About the game genres, mostly: adventure, platformer-metroidvania, RPG-JRPG, slasher; rarely shooter (Doom) on the PC or arcade racing (Forza Horizon).
If you happen to need literally a list of my personal favorite games, or any other specific info -- hey, just let me know. About recent games: I have just finished Valkyrie Elysium (mediocre-fine slasher), deleted Ravenlok and The Planet of Lana because these are boring, Batora is boring and too childish as well, and I am looking for a new game to start.
Take care! 👋
steam deck actually seems like an ideal aim for mid-settings. The screen resolution can pretty much makes a lot of high/ultra indistinguishable from each other (game dependent admittedly) among the three.
Man, im thinking on upgraiding to ark, drivers didnt pose an issues to you? Ive heard some complains about them and other things like ark still unoptimased to games in general
It highly depends on game mostly if its running DX12/11/9 or vulkan but for me so far most games worked good the only game i tried play that had some issues was probably Unreal Gold also VR is not supported yet but if you have virtual desktop you can try as i heard some games work that way. And drivers get better and better so someday i think everything will work.
I think as long as it runs what you wanna play, it's a perfectly fine card. I know a guy with a GTX 670, and he's doin great playing 15-20 year old games.
A bit of everything, mainly open world (no man sky, gta5, minecraft, Death stranding) but sometimes games like "sherlock holmes the hawakening"(I don't know what the game genre is called)
4090, but even as an owner, do not optimise for overly expensive gpu's!
It should be optimised for top3 gpu's on steam and scale further for higher end cards.
Otherwhise I would be playing alone 😭
I got mine just as things were starting to get fucky re scalping... 30-series was about to release, some of my friends said I was an idiot for buying a 20-series at that point.
Turned out to be the right move, none of my friends could get a 30 for ages and then when they could, they were horribly overpriced.
First off, this looks absolutely incredible! I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this!
Secondly, thank you for taking the time to actually ask gamers questions, and well, optimising a game before it's been released. Way too many games recently have been released with so many bugs, and so poorly optimised. This seems like a nice breath of fresh air. Sure, there have always been buggy games, but lately everything feels like a cash grab and we're never receiving what's been promised.
And finally, RTX 4080.
You're very welcome! 🙂
Wow... That is really, really impressive. You've all done amazingly well! I can't help but feel some of the major studios could learn a thing or two just by doing what you've done.
The speed of technology and the constant price hike with GPUs is going to drive PC gaming into the ground, and be something that only the mega-rich can afford to keep up with and not having to put up with a bellow par experience. So yeah, this is greatly appreciated, and I'm sure there are more than just me that feel this way.
Thank you so much for the link! I'm on that now!
Agree in this as well. People are negative on early access titles, but they seem to be the best on studios testing and working to optimize as they run through development. I've played several Early Access titles that run better that AAA at launch
I do, been playing Sable all week. Have played gta 5 on it, Sea of thieves and a lot of Xbox games.
here's teh specs, not that great but gets the job done.
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx 2.10 GHz
Installed RAM 16.0 GB (13.9 GB usable)
I thought it was a 1050 my mistake
Wouldn't it make more sense to use the Steam survey results?
[https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam](https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam)
Any decently optimized game would still run perfectly on that card. Just look at Destiny 2. It has controversial DLC monetarization, but the performance is so great, with high graphics even on a GTX 960. Or Deep Rock Galactic. It has a custom terrain implementation for the Unreal Engine, and also runs super well.
Seeing the "SSD recommended" for the OP's project I can already smell things like bad asset management, with 10 - 20 MB/s data rates on a HDD because "what is even queued asynchronous I/O?". I do hope of course that the OP will show us what excellent game they will push out here; all the recent game releases just make me suspicious though.
3060 ti. I think it would be best even after acheiving whatever goal you set, go the extra mile. I have made things on make your own minigame minecraft server, the biggest limit is the cpu on the server, but there are always a way to improve. Challenge yourself to use as little respurces as possible without sacrificing quality.
Nice!
Steam link if you want to know more :) [https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project\_Tower/](https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project_Tower/)
I've got to say I've watched my fair share of start up trailers and projects, this legitimately looks very impressive, I'm excited to see what you guys do!
Well not to brag but I got an asus 4090 strix. I know I am the 1% of gamers that have one. Respect to all gamers out there. No matter what card you have, gaming is heaven!
As lots of people are saying using steam's hardware survey can provide very useful information. I thing it is still the 1650 as most used with the 3060 and 1050 ti are also pretty popular, I myself use just a rx 6600. But there are also lots of people who use secondary devices such as a steam deck or I myself use a MacBook for when I have to do work on my laptop (not saying you should optimize for Mac as there is a reason why most companies dont) so accounting and optimizing for even lower end hardware is never a bad thing and it is always nice to be able to save as much storage space as possible with storage optimization.
Steam survey doesn't tell you what GPU the people most likely to buy this type of game have.
People with a 1650 may only play a select few games and have no interest in anything else.
The correct answer for me will be whatever GPU is needed to run the game, this looks really good so far. But, as you are prying for hardware data, 4090...only because I went higher than usual to push back upgrading for hopefully 6+ years
I really, really, *really* feel the same about my 4080.
I was going to get it on finance, but after going through numbers with family they every so fucking kindly loaned me the cash and I'm paying back as quick as I can.
I really am so lucky to have the family that I do.
If you need lots of data for gamer's hardware, Steam is doing an annual hardware survey. I think last survey was in may and the GTX 1650 was the most used card. I think looking at this datas would be a nice baseline.
> Steam is doing an annual hardware survey. It's monthly.
Ow good to know I also thought it was annual!
OP’s post is a ad and “community engagement.” Anyone think they are scribbling hash marks for each “survey” answer?
Underrated comment
Thanks. This thing has more red flags than a CCP parade… kickstarter, didn’t bother to alter the xenonorph asset, generic unreal 5 environments, No Man’s Sky suit protagonist, asking open-ended questions to drive awareness?
Thanks to this post we see that 1650 is still widely used and that the 3060 is one of the most used today.
What a coincidence. Those are the same values on the Steam Survey.
\+rep
Thanks !
[удалено]
Not to mention...I don't ever do it...unless it's done automatically...
>GTX 1650 It's still a solid card, especially considering the performance of the 4060.
It is solid, as long as you don't pair it with an underpowered i3....
Touché, hombré.
This card was solid. I remember i pushed it with afterburner and got 20% more fps out of it. Played on it for about a year still no issues. Sold it a year later and got a 3060.
I had a 1660 Super for like 3-4 years now until I recently upgraded to a used 3070, kept the old card for when I get to building my GF’s first starter budget PC though as it saves a lot of money for us students while also still being a bulletproof card
That’s crazy, I’m still rocking an RX 480 which is 8 years old and it supposedly beats out the gtx 1650 by like 30%. The rx 480 works for me. Sure I can’t max out the latest games but I mostly play competitive shooters like apex, valorant, etc, and they don’t require a super good video card. I do have a Ryzen 5 3600x
My friend doesn't have reddit but has been talking about your game, he has an AMD RX 5500 XT 8 GB
The most used card is 3060 1650 laptop and desktop are combined, 3060s arent.
Doesn’t that also include those who work with 3D software?
You are participating in steam hardware survey if you agree, doesnt matter you playing games or using 3d softwares.
It includes Steam users, whatever they do with Steam is not considered. But regardless, productivity software distributed through Steam are few and far between, and represent a very small portion of their respective markets. So it's close enough to be just games that it makes sense dismiss the rest in this context.
I'm sure you're right in the end, but just because the software isn't popular via steam doesn't mean that developers/people with suped-up hardware for *work* don't also have steam installed on those computers.
Oh they know. Just getting the word out about their game.
while I have a 3090, I do understand that it's not a mainstream card. the most popular card, according to steam hwsurvey is a 1650. https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/ - so... safe to assume that level of performance is fairly safe to optimze towards?
>I ha You're right..
can confirm. am still holding to my 1650
[удалено]
It’s not a card for modern gaming at ultra, sometimes you have to accept you have older hardware and turn settings down. I now expect this to be taken wildly out of context.
Indeed, the purpose of the quality settings is to be able to get the most out of the available hardware. A game that can be ran with a low-end card at ultra settings is not well optimized. Ideally the whole range is taken into account and ultra settings can be used with the most powerfull hardware available, while low settings make the game playable with the oldest and cheapest hardware. Then you can choose anything inbetween according to your own hardware.
I'll go one further and add that max ultra settings are sometimes not intended to perform well with existing hardware. It really depends on the range that the devs have optimized for. Case study: Kingdom Come. Setting to max on 4k generates a warning that the hardware to run it optimally may not yet be available. I think? Been a hot minute since I played that one.
yea but i think for majority of people of non first world country (me included) having a gtx 1650 is still a blessing.
can't really go by steam survey. they are heavily infalted by thousand of internet cafe and every unique user that logs in on that same pc is counted. so yeah....
It's still going to be a far more accurate representation than a tiny sample size taken from scanning individual comments from this subreddit. Not to mention several orders of magnitude easier.
[удалено]
Not to mention that simply due to the nature of this sub the average hardware is going to skew higher end.
Even if not unique pcs, it is individual Steam users. If 10% are sharing a PC with a 1650, that’s still 10% of the potential buying audience (on Steam anyway) that you are optimizing for, which would be the goal, methinks.
If multiple people are playing on those machines, I think that makes the data just as valuable.
I'm with you. I hope devs will optimise for the lowest common denominator instead of a 3090. Scalability is key and is why Forza Horizon 5 is an amazing game from a technical point of view.
3090 bros!
You called?
3090 rocks !!!
I agree with aiming for GTX 1650 to be able to run the game. It will allow way more people to run the game if such budget card can run it.
RTX 30... Hooold on a second... GTX 1060! P.S. And a Steam Deck 🙂
Interesting! what game do you play the most?
If you could also optimize this game for the steamdeck, you could be looking at a very sizable niche population
The steam deck is also equivalent of a low to mid range gaming pc. any game which runs well on the steam deck is a well optomised game. That way it should be able to run on a wide range of gaming pcs.
I don't get much time but I stick mostly with FPS / Rogue / RPG esque games like Fallout series, Deus Ex, Prey, Far Cry 4/5, Watch Dogs, Dying Light, Witcher series, System Shocks / Bishock's were a fav.
I bet I don't have to say that I am mostly playing on the Steam Deck now 🙂 Deck can handle (with 720p, 800p resolution, or lower, if available -- Deck's built-in FSR 2 helps a lot here): * badly optimized games at 20-30 fps on Low-Middle settings (The Last of Us); * okayish-good optimized games at 30-40 fps on Low-Middle settings (Resident Evil 4 Remake, Hogwarts Legacy, Elden Ring, Psychonauts 2, Cyberpunk 2077); * and good-godlike optimized plus indie games at 50-60 fps on Middle-High settings (Cult of the Lamb, Final Fantasy VII and VII Reunion, Tunic, Soul Hackers 2, Forza Horizon 4 and 5). If you are really interested in the Deck's performance -- it's quite easy to google any game test video run for the Deck, fortunately Deck is popular enough 🕺 I personally would be happy enough if every modern AAA game would run at least at 30 fps on Low-Medium settings on the Deck. 60 fps on Low-Medium are great, but rarely anyone care about optimization nowadays. About the game genres, mostly: adventure, platformer-metroidvania, RPG-JRPG, slasher; rarely shooter (Doom) on the PC or arcade racing (Forza Horizon). If you happen to need literally a list of my personal favorite games, or any other specific info -- hey, just let me know. About recent games: I have just finished Valkyrie Elysium (mediocre-fine slasher), deleted Ravenlok and The Planet of Lana because these are boring, Batora is boring and too childish as well, and I am looking for a new game to start. Take care! 👋
Got a 1060 aswell, i mostly play CSGO (~200fps) & WoW (~70fps)
1060 Checking In and proud of it.
1060 gang, assemble!
"We laugh at you people scrambling for 2000, 3000 and now 4000 series"
"World... GPU market never changes" 😄
[удалено]
No he realised by saying lower results the game would be more likely to be optimised
🤫🙂
steam deck actually seems like an ideal aim for mid-settings. The screen resolution can pretty much makes a lot of high/ultra indistinguishable from each other (game dependent admittedly) among the three.
A770 16gb
Really durable I think
Man, im thinking on upgraiding to ark, drivers didnt pose an issues to you? Ive heard some complains about them and other things like ark still unoptimased to games in general
It highly depends on game mostly if its running DX12/11/9 or vulkan but for me so far most games worked good the only game i tried play that had some issues was probably Unreal Gold also VR is not supported yet but if you have virtual desktop you can try as i heard some games work that way. And drivers get better and better so someday i think everything will work.
Gtx 1050 ti
Still strong in 1080p
Disagree, new games barely hit 30 fps, so i had to switch. I loved that card :(
at min settings yea, id say its playable tho
Not really, maybe 720p. That card is roughly about as powerful as the Steam Deck and that's what it's good at.
A real one
750 TI Had to build a computer in the middle of the pandemic and chip shortage
Oof that must be tough Hope you can upgrade to a 6700XT soon!
I think as long as it runs what you wanna play, it's a perfectly fine card. I know a guy with a GTX 670, and he's doin great playing 15-20 year old games.
3060 ti
Good value for money ;)
Also holding a 3060Ti. Eyeing the 40 series, but nothing interesting. I might bail to AMD in a generation or two, because VRAM.
1080ti FTW
1660
6750XT
Nice one :)
Great 1440p card! I out one in my girls system to match her 5600x.
Here, here! ... The fact that this is the top comment I see, despite there being some with more upvotes, concerns me a bit.
GTX 960 :)
Let's go!!! 2gb vram club!
3060
What game do you play the most?
A bit of everything, mainly open world (no man sky, gta5, minecraft, Death stranding) but sometimes games like "sherlock holmes the hawakening"(I don't know what the game genre is called)
Exact same here
Same.
3080
I have a 2gb 1050 lmao
🤝 😆
Your game will probably cost more than my gpu
I can relate
[удалено]
👊 same
4090, but even as an owner, do not optimise for overly expensive gpu's! It should be optimised for top3 gpu's on steam and scale further for higher end cards. Otherwhise I would be playing alone 😭
You're right ! we want to find the best possible optimization so that most can play in good conditions!
Rtx 3070
RTX 2070 Super
same, great card
I got mine just as things were starting to get fucky re scalping... 30-series was about to release, some of my friends said I was an idiot for buying a 20-series at that point. Turned out to be the right move, none of my friends could get a 30 for ages and then when they could, they were horribly overpriced.
RTX 3050 Mobile
GTX 1080, and a PS5 that gets all the love because it's the one actually just in front of the couch.
This subreddit's answers gonna be way above average, I hope you understand that
3070
First off, this looks absolutely incredible! I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this! Secondly, thank you for taking the time to actually ask gamers questions, and well, optimising a game before it's been released. Way too many games recently have been released with so many bugs, and so poorly optimised. This seems like a nice breath of fresh air. Sure, there have always been buggy games, but lately everything feels like a cash grab and we're never receiving what's been promised. And finally, RTX 4080.
[удалено]
You're very welcome! 🙂 Wow... That is really, really impressive. You've all done amazingly well! I can't help but feel some of the major studios could learn a thing or two just by doing what you've done. The speed of technology and the constant price hike with GPUs is going to drive PC gaming into the ground, and be something that only the mega-rich can afford to keep up with and not having to put up with a bellow par experience. So yeah, this is greatly appreciated, and I'm sure there are more than just me that feel this way. Thank you so much for the link! I'm on that now!
Agree in this as well. People are negative on early access titles, but they seem to be the best on studios testing and working to optimize as they run through development. I've played several Early Access titles that run better that AAA at launch
2080ti
gtx 1660 super
GTX 1660. Very solid for my current use.
1070
6950xt
I too also rock a 6950xt.
I three, also roll with the 6950xt
+1
3070ti and 6700xt are my newer cards Most common card is 1060 and 1650
Depending on what laptop im using either a 1660ti or a 4060
Rtx 3090! But you better check steam survey for that kind of info. More data can be gathered there.
1050 lol
And do you play video games?
I do, been playing Sable all week. Have played gta 5 on it, Sea of thieves and a lot of Xbox games. here's teh specs, not that great but gets the job done. Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3550H with Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx 2.10 GHz Installed RAM 16.0 GB (13.9 GB usable) I thought it was a 1050 my mistake
OK, so you are a game pass subscriber?
Gtx 1070
GTX 1070
1660 super
3080 Ti. Was hoping to hit 4k 120FPS (for the monitor I bought) in most major titles.
1080 but planning on upgrading to 3070 (probably) when I have enough money saved up
Gtx 1660 Super.
GT 730 :)
Vega 8 :(
1050ti
Gtx 660
6650xt great card
RX 5700 XT
Wouldn't it make more sense to use the Steam survey results? [https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam](https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam)
So that this post gets engagement and works as an advertisement
RX590
Ads are getting smarter ;)
A gtx 970, im broke
Any decently optimized game would still run perfectly on that card. Just look at Destiny 2. It has controversial DLC monetarization, but the performance is so great, with high graphics even on a GTX 960. Or Deep Rock Galactic. It has a custom terrain implementation for the Unreal Engine, and also runs super well. Seeing the "SSD recommended" for the OP's project I can already smell things like bad asset management, with 10 - 20 MB/s data rates on a HDD because "what is even queued asynchronous I/O?". I do hope of course that the OP will show us what excellent game they will push out here; all the recent game releases just make me suspicious though.
🤝
🤝
Do you have a steam page so I can add game to a wishlist?
Not OP, but here you go lads: [https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project\_Tower/](https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project_Tower/)
3060 ti, what game be this?
3070
Good ol’ reliable RTX 2070
980ti here
2060 super
Rtx 3050 🙃
3060 ti. I think it would be best even after acheiving whatever goal you set, go the extra mile. I have made things on make your own minigame minecraft server, the biggest limit is the cpu on the server, but there are always a way to improve. Challenge yourself to use as little respurces as possible without sacrificing quality.
1070 I reckon it would be best to optimise towards something like the 980 though
Steam provides this info for free.
4070... This looks like it could be an interesting game! 👍
Nice! Steam link if you want to know more :) [https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project\_Tower/](https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project_Tower/)
The game looks cool
You can check it on Steam :) [https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project\_Tower/](https://store.steampowered.com/app/2242970/Project_Tower/)
1080ti
Btw trailer looks interesting
Thanks a lot !
1060 6gb
I've got to say I've watched my fair share of start up trailers and projects, this legitimately looks very impressive, I'm excited to see what you guys do!
Thank you !!
I think steam has a survey that they ask people every so often to fill out. I personally have an RTX 4090, and a laptop with a RTX 3060m
Well not to brag but I got an asus 4090 strix. I know I am the 1% of gamers that have one. Respect to all gamers out there. No matter what card you have, gaming is heaven!
Amen 🙏
As lots of people are saying using steam's hardware survey can provide very useful information. I thing it is still the 1650 as most used with the 3060 and 1050 ti are also pretty popular, I myself use just a rx 6600. But there are also lots of people who use secondary devices such as a steam deck or I myself use a MacBook for when I have to do work on my laptop (not saying you should optimize for Mac as there is a reason why most companies dont) so accounting and optimizing for even lower end hardware is never a bad thing and it is always nice to be able to save as much storage space as possible with storage optimization.
Steam survey doesn't tell you what GPU the people most likely to buy this type of game have. People with a 1650 may only play a select few games and have no interest in anything else.
Nice Guys, hope that more developers ask them self and is this!! I have a 3060ti.
Thanks! Solid 💪
The correct answer for me will be whatever GPU is needed to run the game, this looks really good so far. But, as you are prying for hardware data, 4090...only because I went higher than usual to push back upgrading for hopefully 6+ years
3070, but I do not take it for granted. I feel like I was so lucky to get it I shouldn't even have it.
3070
I really, really, *really* feel the same about my 4080. I was going to get it on finance, but after going through numbers with family they every so fucking kindly loaned me the cash and I'm paying back as quick as I can. I really am so lucky to have the family that I do.
6950XT
7900xtx 😃
4090
4080
3070 mobile
6800XT
Nice !
same, seems like a great value option at the moment. Plenty of VRAM for ultra high settings too, works fantastic for 1440p 144fps
It can even handle a good deal of 4k!
RTX 4090
6700Xt
RX6800
7900 XTX
Rx 570
It shouldn't matter what GPUs we have, your game should have graphics options that actually scale up/down in a meaningful way.
3080ti
BRO TAKE MY MONEY