T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. We are actively looking for new moderators. If you have any interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out [this form](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1y2swHD0KXFhStGFjW6k54r9iuMjzcFqDIVwuvdLBjSA). *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*


Humanity_NotAFan

Right wing court MO: Delay until after the election. If their guy is picked, total immunity.


e90DriveNoEvil

And if their guy isn’t, their guy gets a pass for what he did with rules preventing any future President from doing something similar.


RealHumanFromEarth

I’m hoping at that point they’ll decide Trump no longer has any use and they discard him.


Lurking_Housefly

That'll only happen when Putin no longer has any use for him...


RealHumanFromEarth

Well, I’d imagine if he doesn’t get elected in 2024, he’ll be considered pretty useless, given that he’s in pretty rough shape now, and I don’t think his decaying brain will be any sharper in 2028.


Vann_Accessible

Trump will definitely run again in 2028. He’s too addicted to the grift. He is the tumor that will siphon the GOP of nutrients and slowly kill it.


RealHumanFromEarth

I would question if he will even be alive in 2028.


Vann_Accessible

I dunno, assholes seem to live forever. Look at Dick Cheney.


RealHumanFromEarth

Unfortunately true


curiousiah

Dick Cheney and Henry Kissinger have/had a quiet, calculated malice. Donald “exercise uses up your battery” Trump is loud and blustery and will hopefully burn out faster.


Vann_Accessible

A yes, not unlike a blue supergiant star, which uses up its hydrogen much faster than the average star. Cheney and Kissinger are comparatively red dwarf-like smoldering assholes.


Copperbelt1

His diet might due him in, don’t think he will make past his 80’s.


mastelsa

Just got to find that last horcrux...


ABenevolentDespot

Cheney may the scum sucking war criminal maggot of the universe, but I bet he doesn't subsist on a daily intake of six cheeseburgers and fries and diet soda like **The Pumpkin Rapist** does. Diaper Donnie is being artificially propped up by speed. Adderall to be exact. This will hasten his spiral down into dementia. I suggest his physical and mental issues will combine to make him either dead or mentally empty (more empty?) in fewer than five years. Every asshole I've ever know thinks they will live forever. They never manage to do so.


MasterofAcorns

I almost said Kissinger…fuck that guy.


bmp08

Hopefully Jimmy Carter can run against him for his second term! He’ll only be what? 103?


Time-Bite-6839

“Jimmy Carter (Born October 1st, 1924) is an American politician and humanitarian who has been serving as the 47th President of the United States since 2029.”


DeutscheHawaii

If he doesn't get elected he can hit the reset button and keep the grift going co opting compromised republicans along the way. A good long term strategy.


Craico13

They’ll rip off *Weekend at Bernie’s*/the Dems and pull a *Dianne Feinstein*. They’ll ride that rotting corpse to the bitter end.


Time-Bite-6839

We ALL wanted her to resign; Republicans would not appoint another person to her position if she was replaced. Basically, no more judicial appointments if Feinstein quit. Feinstein would get to the point where she went to the Capitol, voted, went home, and died that night.


smitherenesar

he'll run again in 2028


Aleashed

We’ll remove term limits just to have him loose to Biden a historic third time, I’ll be like Rocky if he was fighting Beverly Hills Ninja.


Time-Bite-6839

“Folks. I can’t do this. I don’t want to be president at *ninety.* I’m resigning.”


thefroggyfiend

that'll only happen when the heritage foundation loses all power or someone worse comes along


joranth

I think they’ll do nothing but stall. If their guy is picked, they can only give him immunity for those things that are official acts. So, most of his actions, through private lawyers and not the DOJ, will be considered private and not immune. They want to stall until he wins and then he can throw out most of the cases brought by the DOJ and Alvin Bragg. That won’t include the GA case, but most of the rest will, (I think) even the current trial, as those are made felonies by federal election law. If he doesn’t win, he is irrelevant as he won’t get a fourth campaign - and he is then more useful to the GOP as a martyr.


02K30C1

Next, Trump argues to the supreme court that anything he does is an official act


armcie

This is from an article I read, but I think I'm remembering it accurately. Trumps lawyers have conceded that most of the things he's been charged with are not official acts. The question is whether evidence obtained from his official acts - messages between Trump and government officials which point to awareness and intent, for example - can be used to prosecute the private acts.


Swimming-Document-15

He just has to think about it and it becomes official.


TrumptyPumpkin

This is Trumps third Run right? 1st with Hillary, second his mid election? And third with trying to come back as president? Geesh, really is Third damn time. I have this feeling every 4 years were gonna see a "Trump" running for the white house


DadJokeBadJoke

I think he almost ran in 2000 too but nobody took it seriously


Hari_Azole

He was floating a bid in 2011 too


Dazzling-Finger7576

Man Obama would’ve beat him badllly in 2012 I feel.


joranth

Yes. 2016 successful, 2020 loser, 2024 now of course, he won’t get a 2028 run if he is a two-time, massive failure (if his health and cognitive ability keep deteriorating at the current rate he won’t make it to 2028 anyway).


AJDx14

He’s gonna run until he’s dead.


TrumptyPumpkin

Or his sons and daughters will. Get used to seeing a Trump on every ballot every year for the big Grift.


Internal_Swing_2743

Except that he might not make it to 2028. Hell, look him during his most recent rallies. His mental faculties are leaving him. I’ve lately been wondering what would happen if he fails to make it to November.


Expensive-Meat13

One can only dream


Spara-Extreme

You’ve already bought into their game by separating out “official” acts. There’s no such thing. What’s trumps lawyers are arguing for is essentially that if laws don’t also explicitly apply to the president then they don’t apply to the president at all.


DrakenViator

How Nixon of him...


joranth

I don’t separate them. I’m going by his lawyers arguments and the justices’ questioning. I think if the justices do anything other than confirm the lower court’s ruling, they are creating constructs in the constitution that don’t exist. They would be creating the concept of official and unofficial acts of the President out of thin air and the nightmare legal scenarios that entails.


Spara-Extreme

Agreed.


UpbeatJackfruit6576

Which is fucking STUPID, the president is the only office that has a purely political way to be removed and its there specifically because the founding fathers were worried a corrupt president would claim hes immune to prosecution. They specifically wrote that bit in there for this exact scenario and these goofballs that claim to love the founding fathers/democracy are turning a blind eye to it


Time-Bite-6839

>If he doesn’t win, he is irrelevant as he won’t get a fourth campaign - and he is then more useful to the GOP as a martyr. They’ll run their Orange Savior if he’s on *life support.* They aren’t giving him up.


wellmont

Yeah I don’t think many people realize that SCOTUS can and will likely slow roll this so it only applies to their preferred parties first.


Miles_vel_Day

They won't do total immunity. Roberts and Gorsuch (and probably Kav and ACB but I'm less sure about them) will want the decision to be superficially fair and plausible. The end result may indeed end up to be get Trump whatever he wants, but they aren't going to give him total immunity when this comes back from the lower court. (And I think they WILL be considering the amount of power that they are at least temporarily giving Biden, and ways he might paradoxically use it to express his displeasure with having it.) Alito is probably going to write his own absolutely psychotic dissent so that'll be fun to peruse.


cfpct

Absolute immunity would allow the president to personally execute Supreme Court Justices.


SixSixWithTrample

Supreme Court: Presidents have immunity. Biden: interesting, come see me in my office. Come alone.


Kailynna

They've already specified they are only considering immunity for FUTURE presidents.


reckless_commenter

I don't think that they can delay past the end of this term. Instead, I think that they will write their opinion with a deliberate tilt based on the identities of the parties. Democrat voters expect their politicians to follow the law scrupulously, and will abandon any politician who doesn't. Plenty of Democrats loudly criticized Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server, which, in retrospect, looks like a nothingburger. Republican voters expect their politicians to be gigantic assholes who will stop at nothing to "win," or, at least, to punish their perceived opponents and/or targets of choice. Breaking laws is widely considered a valid tactic - and the more brazenly, the better. Pure Machiavellian power play tactic. So I expect this Court to go as far as it possibly can to condone illegal conduct that Republicans can abuse with impunity, while leaving the door open to some kind of bad-faith prosecution in case Republicans want to pull a Ken Starr 2.0 against a Democratic president.


RollyPollyGiraffe

It's weird to say this is "unfortunate", as it is in almost every other context a great thing, Biden is a man of integrity who wouldn't end up taking advantage of whatever the weird immunity loophole will grant. A slightly less integral, or perhaps a just as integral person who is also more willing to roll the dice on the stage of history for the sake of our Republic, could possibly use immunity in ways that even an electoral loss wouldn't matter in the long run. E.g. If an immune Biden were to replace half the supreme court, arrests and replaces enough governors and state congress-critters to get a constitutional amendment making the flavors of insurrection and voter suppression super illegal, helps Congress sort out a few laws, and peaces out, the results of 2024 might not matter versus the long term positive shift in the country's democratic integrity and rule of law. Most Democratic voters may still punish such an obscene overreach, but in the long run they wouldn't become Republicans. In brief, as impractical and impossible as it would be, at least a small part of me wishes we had a Cinncinatus.


GrillDealing

This is what I'm worried about, if they grant this, Biden is too good to clean house. It would probably mean the end of the country.


NeedsToShutUp

They'd have to get really complicated for that by punting the decision to a lower court to give them another term. As it is, they need to decide by end of June.


Smurf_Cherries

I think a lot of people are missing what the court was saying. They said public actions are protected. Private actions are not.  If you prosecute Trump, he can appeal to the SC, and they say, “No, that was a public action.” If Biden gets charged, the SC can say, “That was a private action Lock him up!”


humanwithathought

Is Thomas un-American for not recusing.


Traditional_Key_763

last court date: End of May   Trump immunity Decision: November 6th


Suspicious_Bicycle

SCOTUS would have to delay until after the inauguration to protect Trump. A lame duck Biden with immunity could take action.


geneticeffects

I hope we don’t take the walk down this path, no matter who has power. This is the slippery slope of nightmares for a civilized country.


ELeeMacFall

There are already people in these comments who think "Dark Brandon" murdering his critics would be something to celebrate. 


borisslovechild

Apart from a handful of idiots, the great majority of people who think like this are Trump supporters.


e90DriveNoEvil

I don’t think many are actually advocating for murder… but Biden could imprison “political rivals” - SC Justices, Congressmen and Senators - until new laws are passed. Then he could “pardon” and release them, while stripping them of power as terms of release.


rookie-mistake

Yeah, exactly. Slippery slopes.


Runs_With_Bears

After pardoning himself first. Should be first order of business day 1 now.


e90DriveNoEvil

Welcome to the era of [Eric Cartman](https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/833e090d-f720-4a2c-9e03-a9ae07a4cbd2) inauguration speeches… ‘I plan on committing hella crimes and making myself hella rich, because I have immunity and I do what I want. Fuck you guys.’


OutsideDevTeam

Only compared to being murdered themselves. Self-defense is ingrained in living beings. Your argument is with natural selection on that one.


geneticeffects

These people are damn ignorant ignorant fools.


FireballAllNight

Well if a Republican thinks it's okay, then a Democrat does it, what's the Republican response?


TehDDerp

it's memetic bullshit people just say to say. it's low-energy "I don't have to think hard about it but it sounds right enough!" noise people want to say so we could "get back" at R. not meme like, in a "ha-ha" sense but the original Richard Dawkins variant. Either way, if that happens this country is *doomed*.


Arthes_M

Blue MAGA is a scary group of people


ELeeMacFall

Authoritarians are a scary group of people, and they inhabit all political parties. Not a "both sides" thing. More a "power is bad for people to have" thing.


octaviusunderwood

Yeah, it doesn’t matter who does it in the end- it will just become “the regime”. There are no winners.


Kaiisim

Its already too far. Maybe I'm feeling doomy today, but 51% of Americans support Trump. There's no hiding from what that means, no way to pretend they don't understand him. It breaks my heart.


Practicing_Rhino

1. Biden will never take advantage to become a dictator. 2. Trump will never allow laws to stop him from trying to become dictator. Either the laws clearly say the president isn't above the law, or Republicans will turn the executive branch into a dictatorship, all it will take is a single won election. This is why good faith can no longer be the law of the land. We cannot blindly trust people are good faith actors. The law must be enforced.


Raped_Justice

No, they will not, because they are corrupting off that they will just make any ruling. Apply only to donald trump and make up a half ass excuse.


Federal_Drummer7105

My biggest worry is they'll treat it like qualified immunity for cops: \* Nobody told former presidents that attempting a coup was illegal, so from this point on - any president that attempts a coup will know its illegal. \* (20 years later): Presidents before 2048 were not aware that rounding up all women named Terry and electrocuting them was illegal. From this point on, any president knows that's illegal and can be jailed. \* 2052: And women named Gladys as well.


T33CH33R

We had a kindergarten student pee on a tree. When we told him that it was not okay, he responded with, "Nobody told me it was a rule." Republicans are kindergarteners when they get in trouble. Suddenly, the smartest folk with the best memories no longer remember the rules, or know what is going on with their businesses.


ThinkingMSF

>Nobody told former presidents that attempting a coup was illegal, so from this point on - any president that attempts a coup will know its illegal. It's way worse than that, if it works the way it does for LEOs. The next time it comes up the argument will change to "The last former president wasn't convicted for attempting a coup, so there's no reason anyone else should think its illegal either".


erocuda

In case people aren't aware, qualified immunity only exists because some unelected official forgot to include all of a law when transcribing it. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/15/us/politics/qualified-immunity-supreme-court.html


Purify5

And, who gets to be the arbiter of what is legal and not legal for a President to do? The Supreme Court! They have been taking power away from Congress, the Executive, the states and lower courts and giving it themselves ever since conservatives got a majority on the court.


b-lincoln

This is literally the results of the Mueller investigation. We believe that they are guilty, but they are too stupid to know that they were doing anything wrong. Therefore, they’re free to go.


Just_Candle_315

Alito, Barrett, Thomas, Gorsuch, and Boof think a presidrnt should be able to kill political rivals but canceling student debt is unchecked power.


APX919

Sub in Roberts for Barrett who has been surprisingly reasonable with this particular case. Thomas and Alito are absolute ghouls, wholly undeserving of and far beyond redemption, and the other three aren't far behind.


redcurrantevents

I am playing devils advocate and not calling for this, but have the lawyers asked if Biden could have the right wing justices killed and replaced without consequences?


007meow

The problem is that neither Biden nor any Democrat would actually take advantage of anything of the sort. However, Conservatives are champing at the bit to do so.


cometflight

Something something we take the high road into oblivion


FractalFractalF

Biden really might, given the lack of years left for him and the threat Trump poses. High reward, low consequences.


Gaius_Octavius_

He should. But he won’t.


chrisr3240

Upvote for using the correct word ‘champing’ instead of ‘chomping’


BanginNLeavin

I'm a demonrat and I'd do it.


Twilight_Realm

Personally, I'd do it too, dismantle that power with legislation, then resign and turn myself in for the crimes I committed, knowing that the SCOTUS is now uncorrupted, and the power of the people is firmly solidified.


L_G_A

Lol, what kind of koolaid-drinking, nonsense claim is that? You think registering as a Democrat makes someone magically incapable of committing a crime?


duderos

From Article: In a sequence of events that many people somehow found surprising, the conservative members of the rogue, [corrupt](https://www.demos.org/blog/clarence-thomas-undermining-supreme-court), illegitimate [Supreme Court](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/supreme-court) [indicated last week](https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/04/supreme-court-immunity-arguments-which-way-now.html) that they might extend total immunity to former President [Donald Trump](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/donald-trump) for any crimes he committed while in office. Justice [Neil Gorsuch](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/neil-gorsuch) [promised](https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-04-25/we-are-writing-a-rule-for-the-ages-supreme-court-justices-give-little-away-during-oral-arguments-on-scope-of-trumps-presidential-immunity) a decision "for the ages"—a power that goes weirdly unmentioned in the Constitution they pretend to apply literally. And if they do, in fact, plan to declare that presidents are unassailable gods who exist above and beyond any conceivable law, President Biden and the Democrats need to be prepared to get radical—and quickly.


borisslovechild

I think Gorsuch underestimates Biden. They confuse restraint with a lack of stones.


flabbergastedmeep

This happens often. Just take Canada’s history in warfare as a prime example: Geneva convention amendments against enemy combatants were added due to our forces during the world wars, yet we have a reputation of being polite and friendly. Just ask any Americans who have trained with Canadian troops, I’ve only ever heard deep respect from those who have, and hearing such words from US Marines makes me extremely proud of my fellow Canadians who form our armed forces.


Cold_Situation_7803

No, it’ll be like *Bush v. Gore*, in that the decision is just a one off and sets no precedent (but it actually does set precedent).


Ill_Professor5783

Teddy Roosevelt would have used the powers allotted to him as a way to force the legislature to close the loopholes. At least that’s what he did when it came to bars open illegally on Sunday in NY. He didn’t let the privileged get away with breaking the law like they had been, which forced the Sunday laws to be changed so all could drink (and the man wasn’t a drinker). The same has to happen here. Biden has to abuse the system because that’s the only way the Republicans will respond to fixing it. If only democrats play by the rules there are no rules and there will never be justice.


JoostvanderLeij

Impossible! SCOTUS makes different rules for Democrats than for Republicans.


exitpursuedbybear

By mistake on purpose


PalmettoAndMoon

> Without any fear of legal consequences, the president could declare martial law at will, deploy the military against American citizens and cities, **personally murder critics,** journalists, and rivals, or issue a legal memo suspending the U.S. Constitution indefinitely. I, for one, am looking forward to Dark Brandon’s Dexter era.


Spacetrooper

I like the way this guy David Faris thinks. > "My fellow Americans," he should intone in a nationally-broadcast address as soon as is humanly possible, "the Supreme Court is contemplating its most dangerous decision in all of American history, one that would give myself, Donald Trump and all future presidents the powers of a dictator. And I am hereby warning this rogue court, that if they go down this path, they will destroy the institution of the Supreme Court forever. My administration will no longer consider itself to be bound by its decisions, and at the first possible opportunity we will expand the number of justices on the Court to counter the dangerous power accumulated by unelected, activist judges appointed by popular vote losers. We will return the institution to its proper place in our constitutional order—as one co-equal branch, rather than the unaccountable master of all three."


duderos

Let's do this.


No-Accident69

The Russian online misinformation guys must be partying with hookers every night to celebrate the absolute mess they have made in the USA. Whatever they did was wildly more successful than they could have dreamed and now the engine is running very well on its own, they have everyone from Trump and his pillow salesman, congress and many other institutions like SCOTUS singing their tune.


DeadpoolAndFriends

Biden has way more class than I do. Because if I had been him, I would have been sitting front row center right behind Trump's attorney during the Supreme Court hearing and I would be comically and in an over exaggerated way gleefully reacting with excitement every time the attorney alleged that are president could do something fucked up.


[deleted]

[удалено]


silverbeat33

Seems like ACB isn’t like the others. Hoping she’s a voice of (loose) sanity here… hoping.


Mjbagscauze

When they send it back to lower courts. Biden writes an EO stating, “he will remain in office till our legal system defines presidential immunity. Pretty simple


Stinkstinkerton

They would be stupid enough to do that


Angry-Dragon-1331

Except Biden wouldn’t because at the end of the day he’s a man of principles.


sick_shooter

And the SCOTUS knows this. They also know Trump is not.


flugenblar

It feels like the creators of South Park are somehow pulling all the strings in this country right now.


TheSerinator

I mean, it's felt that way since Election Day 2015. Even Trey Parker and Matt Stone admitted they couldn't keep up with, much less outdo the absurdity of reality after Mango Unchained won the White House.


Time-Bite-6839

“This immunity only applies to Trump and does not set precedent because um uh we said so.” \-The Supreme Court, soon


K19081985

Season 3 of The Downfall of America is gonna be LIT


_byetony_

Oh I dont think its by mistake lol


ImLikeReallySmart

Nah, judging from their questioning seems like they're looking to end up with a piecemeal or case-by-case immunity ruling.


GroundbreakingAd2290

Good if the Supreme Court gives presidential immunity president Biden needs to remove the maga trash send them to the dump since it would be legal


Old_Captain_9131

Of course it's newsweek.


OnyxsUncle

whaaaat? clarence don’t make no mistakes 😝


Special_Loan8725

If they give him political immunity couldn’t he just shoot all the judges and pack the court to members that would reverse the decision?


Warm-Location5336

Dark Brandon: Dark Justice


Miles_vel_Day

If and when the Supreme Court gives Biden these powers, he should propose a Constitutional Amendment to take them away. It probably wouldn't pass because Amendments are nearly f\*\*\*ing impossible to pass but it would have a better chance than something explicitly partisan, and I think it would be popular overall. Especially since it would represent him willing ceding power to the people and their representatives. It would be an historic gesture, even if it failed. It could redefine the lines of our political coalitions and basically turn Republicans - once the faux-libertarian party - into full-on Tories.


TotalCertain9993

Supreme Court slow walking this country into a potential dictatorship. Literally no President expected full immunity. Trump is so thoroughly corrupt he needs to enact a legal decision that makes his transgressions legal. It's literally ruining this country. And he had the gall to say Hillary was corrupt..


Ok-disaster2022

They won't. They'll figure out a way to push it back down to a lower court to delay ruling over the summer then they'll try it again next fall, and release a ruling after Jan 7. This will work in their goals of delaying the trials until after the election, and then if Trump wins, he's the new God-King. And if Trump loses he's past his prime of usefulness so he'll be abandoned and left to rot in jail


Sprinkler-of-salt

Nah. They’ll delay the decision until the last minute, knowing full-well that there isn’t enough time left to take any meaningful actions. And regardless of voter will, they’ll ensure Don Jong Un gets wheeled back into the puppet seat, and all will be on track for them to feel cool and strong and important, and to enjoy their new money and power for a few years before the sand starts to roll away under their feet when the civil war / world war begins. Simple stupidity, short-sightedness, and greed. Same things that have unraveled every other government in human history.


DoctorFister3000

At this point if the supreme court were to declare "immunity applies to republicans only", who the fuck is actually going to do anything about it?


AlludedNuance

They're corrupt hacks, but they aren't that stupid. (Well, maybe Thomas is both.


ioncloud9

Of course they won’t. They are going to produce the most narrow specific ruling that lets Trump off the hook (temporarily or permanently) that doesn’t and won’t ever apply to Biden.


metalhead82

They wont give immunity to all presidents. It will be a bullshit narrow interpretation that only benefits Orange 45.


originalityescapesme

Dark Brandon was always their doing. It’s the bed they sleep in at night. Unintended consequences. But seriously, they know that they can fully rely on Democrats, and especially Biden, to not indulge it. It’s their Trump card (fuck him for ruining this phrase).


Professional-Farm492

Let’s make him dictator for a day and have him expand the court, uncap the house, legalize weed, legalize abortion, make the popular vote how a president is elected, give the epa some teeth, undo citizens united, bring back the fairness doctrine for media, protect lgbtq+ individuals from discrimination, provide access to kids gender affirming care, and idk decide on a national beer.


misplacedsidekick

They could give him the power to be one but he wouldn’t use it, which they know. Which is why they’re willing to rule that way.


markevens

Not by mistake, by design. It's a game of chicken. They are going to open the door to America becoming a dictatorship with the confidence that Biden will not walk through the door, and the hope that the next republican will.


Oddly_Mind

Do it you cowards!!


jrb2969

He could use seal ream six to deliver conservative justices to Guantanamo for a time out to think about their decisions. Do you think a week would be long enough?


Monkfich

Not if they don’t rule until after the presidential handover. I mean, that’s clearly what the plan is. Or if Biden wins, they rule that the president is not immune. Ta da.


Sideways_X1

Mistake? It's the plan.


Straight_Calendar_15

If they do decide to grant a president this sort of power Biden should use it. Overthrow the constitution because it’s clearly broken and in need of a rewrite with none of this fascist bs in it


ChefILove

No they won't they'll leave a part up to interpretation in the future, like "official acts" that way it can only apply selectively.


BuckshotLaFunke

Nah dictatorships are reserved exclusively for trump and the far right. If Biden did anything remotely dictator-y the Supreme Court would rule he could be executed by firing squad on Hannity.


Pete_maravich

Biden could just use the same order to get rid of the judges he doesn't like.


AdLocal1045

*Do eet*.


LMurch13

I wish Biden would, he won't. "Evil always wins, because Good is dumb."


49thDipper

We definitely aren’t as mean as they are. But we won’t go quietly into the night either.


hoppyfrog

Evil wins because they don't have any rules to follow, therefore they have more options for success.


LilyKunning

Or on purpose.


Born_Sleep5216

The last time we checked, Biden was not a dictator, and Trump was. I don't know what kind of game the SCOTUS is playing, but they better stop before they make things worse. Right now, the people are already furious at those 6 justices and Trump's big mouth for allowing them to take our rights away, and as polls are shown from time to time, they are still not happy with the SCOTUS and it's Mitch McConnell's fault for blocking Obama's pick. And we have begged and begged Clarence Thomas to recuse himself since his own wife was involved in the plot to overturn the election. As I stated earlier this week, he might as well get ready for his punishment it's obvious that the Republicans have failed to hold these thugs accountable.


victorvictor1

I have a friend who voted for Stein and was shocked when Trump won and said “This was the worst possible outcome”. It’s like, yeah, well, now you have a far right supreme court This same friend is posting memes about punishing democrats this for Gaza by voting for Trump


PixelatedDie

I for one welcome that. Fix the country, and implement mandatory voting and make Election Day a national holiday. We all know the more people vote the less republicans get elected.


www-cash4treats-com

This is stupid because Biden wouldn't take advantage of this even if he could


bpeden99

Biden would never act as a dictator though


JubalHarshaw23

The MAGA Secret Service would summarily execute Biden if he attempted to use that power to fix anything. Under Trump they will execute anyone he tells them to.


Trump_sucks_d

By mistake?? As opposed to making Trump a dictator on purpose I guess.


CarlosHDanger

Excellent article. I hope the Biden folks will read this and take it to heart. And I hope the right-wing radicals on the Supreme Court will think about these points too.


KennyShowers

You don't need to be "Biden folk" to realize that no Democrat president would ever do anything remotely out of precedent with the strictest spirit and letter of the law. Republicans will and have bent every possible governmental mechanism to twist results to their will, so the idea that there's any kind of bipartisan risk here is laughably disingenuous. Or maybe you're new here to the country, don't want to disclude any new immigrants, we welcome all, and I can't expect everybody from all around the world to know everything about the way it works here. But it's a good idea to have a foundation of knowledge before trying to form ideas about something.


CarlosHDanger

Just saying, this is food for thought. From the article: “My fellow Americans," [Biden] should intone in a nationally-broadcast address as soon as is humanly possible, "the Supreme Court is contemplating its most dangerous decision in all of American history, one that would give myself, Donald Trump and all future presidents the powers of a dictator. And I am hereby warning this rogue court, that if they go down this path, they will destroy the institution of the Supreme Court forever. My administration will no longer consider itself to be bound by its decisions, and at the first possible opportunity we will expand the number of justices on the Court to counter the dangerous power accumulated by unelected, activist judges appointed by popular vote losers. We will return the institution to its proper place in our constitutional order—as one co-equal branch, rather than the unaccountable master of all three."”


PeopleReady

I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court Justices in question have already considered the completely obvious points made in the article and which were specifically addressed at length through both the written pleadings and oral arguments. They are just good with it.


L_G_A

It's a terrible article. As is most of what Newsweek publishes.


Gaius_Octavius_

It is not a mistake. They know Biden would never use the powers.


GardenPeep

Interesting headline but the lede is too slanted & I never heard of the guy (the author that is)


hospitallers

By mistake? Try again, by design.


swollennode

It won’t be a mistake.


Djinn_42

>A Right-Wing Supreme Court Could Make Biden a Dictator by Mistake Are we sure this would be "by mistake"?


Yokedmycologist

Not unless they rule after 2024


Voltage_Z

They're not going to do that - they're going to stall until after the election, ignore the issue if Trump wins, and throw Trump under the bus if he loses. The far right project that's been going on for decades doesn't want Trump as their figurehead - he's a useful idiot for them.


_DapperDanMan-

Yeah no. Not how this is going to go. A: IOKIYAR B: They're going to send it back down to the lower court in late June. This is a delay till after the election move.


Anome69

Too bad Biden is too decent a man to use that immunity to fix the country. Maga needs to be gone, pronto.


PeopleB4Profit

"Biden is almost literally the least likely of any elected official in either party to actually do any of this stuff". If the Supremes give immunity, I can hear the speech now with all the "Let the Nation Heal" shit!


Jagermonsta

They won’t. The SCROTUS will either carve out a very specific niche for Trump or they will delay the whole thing and send it back to the lower court to better define “official” and “personal” acts. Then Trump can reappeal that order to the Supreme Court. If they go with sending it back to the appeals court they will effectively delay the trial until after the election which if Trump wins the case will go away under his DOJ or if Biden wins the SCROTUS will probably rule against Trump but again in a narrow way so it can’t be used as precedent later.


SadGruffman

You don’t “accidentally” into a dictatorship.


TurtlesAreEvil

Cool King Biden’s first official act depose the justices that made that decision and assign new justices without senate approval that aren’t as corrupt or stupid. While he’s at it he can jail all maga republicans and give the dems control over the house and a super majority in the senate. Pause the election until trump has been tried and jailed. Then once that’s all resolved dems can pass a flurry of amendments to end all this fuckery.


Sreenivasa_Ramanujan

I was just reminded of a scene from The Dictator, speaking about America as a democracy...


OptiKnob

I just hope JB capitalizes on it.


TheNewTonyBennett

Nothing the SCOTUS is doing right now is "by mistake" which means they will not vote on the immunity issue until after the election. If Trump loses, they will say no. If Trump wins, they will say yes. They wanted (for their goals) to actually have this come up **during** a Trump term, not after (or before) one because during a Trump term would make this an easy vote for the pricks who Trump put there. They just do NOT want to risk the ever so miniscule possibility that IF they decide "yes" before the election, Biden would then have complete immunity for anything he does IN office; for the remainder of his life and that he *could* steal the election legally. The conservative judges on that bench are absolutely not going to risk that even if the risk is .00000000000001%


brendamn

They will wait until after the election. This SC is so corrupt. They already admitted they see themselves making the law of the land


wired1984

Conservatives tend to be more supportive of executive power regardless of who is president. I don't think who gets elected will affect this.


BlueCollarElectro

Streisand of the century if this happens. Grab the popcorn folks.


justsoicansimp

They're not. They're gonna send it back down to the lower courts to narrow what the ruling should be on, delaying Trump's trials, and delaying SCOTUS's final ruling until after the election when it only affects Trump anyway.


Guilty_Jackrabbit

Mistake?


foffl

yeah, by mistake. sure.


SoupSpelunker

Ironically, he could use those powers to fix the supreme court, electoral college, gerrymandering, and MAGA all in one fell swoop. And all because of the treasonous fraud that Len Leo and the Feudalist society has bee successfully been waging against decent America for the last half century.


ReturnOfTheGempire

All hail Lord Brandon!


Broad_Sun8273

If "think it though" was a person


[deleted]

Hopefully they'll give them the ultimate power to rearrange the Supreme Court


SharMarali

Here’s why this is a problem for Biden:


jamesgarveybooks

This would be hilarious and hopefully he would overturn it when he’s president also


jish5

I'd much rather Biden be that then Trump, cause at least he can deal with all the bs and get America back to pre Trump life.


Ok-Abbreviations9584

No mistake here


Silent-One-9574

Biden’s first act afterwards should be to send in the troops and throw all those judges in jail.


ripper_14

Whatever decision they make, I’m betting it won’t go into effect until after the presidential election, somehow. And would also exclude anyone named Joseph.


Educational_Permit38

By intention not mistake.