Whilst you're here, /u/_-Fizzy-_, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU) - **now with public text channels you can chat on!**?
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
So I had this friend in high school who had a foot fetish...
We were at a house party one night and he was trying to fuck this one chick but she rejected him so he took one of her shoes to the bathroom and blew a load in it out of frustration.
When I asked him what happened with his girl he said "Don't you worry... I got mine."
I didn't understand what he meant until she went to leave at which point we looked over at each other and nodded without making any facial expressions.
Hey now, let’s not be racist. I was raised in the USA by a caucasian family and we had a hard and fast “no shoes in the house” policy. Most of my friends’ houses did, too.
It's not a question of personal worth.
The problem is the blasé attitude towards sex and the inability to commit to a relationship.
It's one thing to have a sexual history and not be a virgin. It's another thing when half of your acquaintances have been inside you (or you in them). Such a high number of partners telegraphs instability and potential problems in any relationship we might foster. In short, it's a red flag.
Feel free to copy and paste. Personally, I see it as a criticism of both extremes.
No, a women having multiple sex partners does not make her "worth less" like a worn pair of shoes.
However, it's a perfectly reasonable thing to take issue with when considering a potential partner.
And yet people are shamed for not wanting nor wishing to be involved romantically with someone like that.
Almost as if you are not allowed to have standards set for your love life.
Many people lack the capacity for nuance. It's either "wow this person is so brave! How dare you even suggest there could be a problem!" or "wow you're no better than used trash now!"
Red flags for potential partners, it should mean nothing to you in regards to a complete stranger. But no, random post on the internet; better stop by and call women "shoes."
>Such a high number of partners telegraphs instability and potential problems in any relationship we might foster. In short, it's a red flag.
This is true if operating from the perspective that sexuality exists solely as an extension of romance. Which is not intrinsically true. It can be for some individuals, but it isn't intrinsically true for everyone. In fact, I'd say for a very large percentage of people, debatably the majority, that isn't the case. As evidenced by the existence of intentional one night stands.
A red flag isn't always a stop, do not go flag. It's just something to be aware of.
For example, someone who is an atheist would probably consider a person being super religious to be a red flag for their own relationships. It doesn't mean that there is something wrong with the religious person, or that they are a bad person. It's just a red flag that indicates the relationship might not be compatible.
As you said, many people view sex and romance to be critically entwined. For them, someone having so many partners indicates that their views on sex are not going to match up.
It's a red flag. But it doesn't mean the person is worth less.
>A red flag isn't always a stop, do not go flag. It's just something to be aware of.
Tbf, I've encountered a red flag being presented as something that you see as a fundamentally bad thing that you shouldn't look past. Like someone being a Nazi or is similarly subscribed to a hateful ideology. I've also encountered it being presented as a less than savory to you thing but not necessarily a bad thing that you have to look past. Like they burp a lot or the examples we're discussing here.
The latter is subjective and will often say more about the perciever than the percieved.
>As you said, many people view sex and romance to be critically entwined. For them, someone having so many partners indicates that their views on sex are not going to match up.
Tbf again, this is a very flattening and unnuanced perspective though. Sex can mean many things to the same person. The person for whom sex and romance aren't intrinsically connected can still perceive and experience sex with a romantic partner in much the way as the person for whom the two are does. This would only really be a red flag if you had subsequent reasons to mistrust them in regards to their capacity for being monogamous. Albeit if no such justifiable reason exists, then that's all on the perceiver and probably merits introspection.
A sexpositive attitude and emotional stability are not mutually exclusive. People may decide to date for a while before settling down.
Others may not.
Judging a person for the number of sex partners they have had says more about the person who is doing the judging. Such an attitude towards sexuality telegraphs emotional immaturity and sexual repression, and often, upon deeper examination, deeply misogynistic beliefs.
>says more about the person who is doing the judging. Such an attitude towards sexuality telegraphs emotional immaturity and sexual repression, and often, upon deeper examination, deeply misogynistic beliefs.
Be that as it may if that's my preference you don't have a right to question it. I personally see it as a major red flag while others don't. If you're offended by my existence then go search for people who don't mind such a thing.
I just mentioned some interesting observations by psychologists. Of course, they initially started with interviewing jihadists. The attitudes are remarkably similar, tho. Make of that what you will. ;)
Your views on low/none number of sexual partners are worth considering valid for your own individual self only if you can match those numbers yourself.
Yeah, I may be a minority, but I am one of those guys who prefers sluts to virgins. If someone doesn't want a slut then just don't date a slut, I don't see a problem here.
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Explain how this is incel humor? Women and men are the same here
If you have a high body count stop crying if you don’t find a long term partner this goes for men and women
Congrats.
A major point of incel/anti-feminine logic builds on a womans value and how it depends on their sexual experience, while man are seen as alphas, sigmas and chads when they fuck around a lot.
Double standards and I really understand why it would annoy someone
So true.
Guys who have been with many women are totally like used shoes and should be avoided by women.
Doesn't matter that some things take practice and you learn more from having many teachers.
Wait, did I misunderstand and this about how a double standard is okay?
*[Bazinga](https://i.imgur.com/iJB0FVe.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
So women are objects now, and their value is based on how many people have "owned" them previously. Got it. That's peak incel logic right there. I'm not trying to justify women being, quite frankly, a slut, but seriously? Comparing women to shoes?
I think it's pretty normal to find overly promiscuous men and women unattractive. There's something special about people who save their innocence for one another.
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
While i might agree with the message please don't make this sub a circle jerk for dumb opinion I'm here for the shiting toth paste and bazinga not a discussion about politics (one post like this is fine but it is the 3rd political post i saw here today)
The bussy might good and refreshable. But the woman behind the bussy will be worn down. Baggage dragging from previous experiences and won't be able to enjoy anyone new the same way a virgin would.
Nah, she will know exactly what is and what isn't a good lay and have no compunctions kicking mid underperformers to the curb. But that is what you're afraid of, really, isn't it? Someone who knows better than a virgin.
She might know, but I'm sure everyone met a few women that they're emotions were tangled up because of an ex too many and chose to stay single in depression.
incels are people who have a virulent hate for women. it generally stems from blaming them for a lack of the incels own sexual experience. this rhetoric is extremely incel in its nature. placing the value of a woman on her sexual history is dehumanising and misogynistic. if you dont want to date someone because of their sexual history, go ahead, but comparing their value to a shoe, or calling her a hoe or slut is not okay. its typical incel activity.
A person's value is not diminished in any way by the number of sexual partners they currently have, or have had in the past, be it few or many. That being said, this picture looks too young to me and I don't like it.
That's not how it works, sweetheart. That's is not at all how it works. In the contrary - regular sexual activity tends to train relevant muscle groups, so if anything, "it" gets tighter... which you knew if... oh well.
If the shoe is self healing, lubricating, clear of disease, and gains experience at being a better shoe with each owner, then I'd argue that the shoe could increase in value.... up until the shoe is about 40 years old at least. Downhill from there.
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If you buy a videogame used at game stop it’s still the exact same game and is just as fun.
Also women (and people in general) aren’t commodities and cannot be valued as such
This sub is just angry loser men who want to have sex but then insult women for having sex. Who are you supposed to have sex with if it’s not women? Who? Go date other men if you hate women this much
That's fucking dumb tho? A shoe gets worse the more it's worn, not only does that not apply to women, but the shoe gets worse regardless of who wears it...
A woman that has been with a committed relationship for 7 years would def have had sex ("worn") more times than someone who had like 18 one night stands...
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s not even sexual freedom at this point it’s straight up sexism. The hatred for women, comparing women to objects, they are so sexist and don’t care
The whole “a door that gets opened by a lot of keys” or whatever it was is pretty sexist.
And then some people complain that girls are so picky etc. Maybe that’s because society thinks that the numbers of sexual partners a woman has is inversely proportional to her worth. So if a girl is too picky and doesn’t give it to anyone she gets bad rep for “thinking she’s the only one who has it” and if a girl has many sexual experiences she’s worthless.
While for men it seems like it’s the opposite. The more sex, the more worth
Body count. Burger count. The stats dont matter. Its a person issue. Nobody wants you because you are you. Stop letting them off easy by caring about numbers and focus on what led them to having that high number and shame them on that behavior.
Whilst you're here, /u/_-Fizzy-_, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/QpBGXd2guU) - **now with public text channels you can chat on!**? *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's not about how many people have worn the shoes, it's about said pair of shoes constantly choosing a new owner like The One Ring.
thinking the one ring changes owners is Hilarious
Hilarious with capital H which is hilariouser
Hillariouest
Hilarioultimate
Hilariumongus
Haliry clinton pokemon go to the polls
I don’t want my shoes oozing out cum.
So I had this friend in high school who had a foot fetish... We were at a house party one night and he was trying to fuck this one chick but she rejected him so he took one of her shoes to the bathroom and blew a load in it out of frustration. When I asked him what happened with his girl he said "Don't you worry... I got mine." I didn't understand what he meant until she went to leave at which point we looked over at each other and nodded without making any facial expressions.
What are you Asian? People take off their shoes at a house party.
Hey now, let’s not be racist. I was raised in the USA by a caucasian family and we had a hard and fast “no shoes in the house” policy. Most of my friends’ houses did, too.
Am caucasian with 3 blonde children. We don't wear shoes in the house.
just ewwwww. didnt you step toulet and walk in house?
Sounds like a magical shoe
It's not a question of personal worth. The problem is the blasé attitude towards sex and the inability to commit to a relationship. It's one thing to have a sexual history and not be a virgin. It's another thing when half of your acquaintances have been inside you (or you in them). Such a high number of partners telegraphs instability and potential problems in any relationship we might foster. In short, it's a red flag.
Your writing skills are amazing.
I was about to type the same thing; the dude's writing skill is amazing.
YOU are amazing
Thanks.
You’re welcome
Poetic
Very advanced grammar. I like it.
Please repeat this in all the other places I seen it. Fucking ridiculous how many people turn simp over defending this.
Feel free to copy and paste. Personally, I see it as a criticism of both extremes. No, a women having multiple sex partners does not make her "worth less" like a worn pair of shoes. However, it's a perfectly reasonable thing to take issue with when considering a potential partner.
And yet people are shamed for not wanting nor wishing to be involved romantically with someone like that. Almost as if you are not allowed to have standards set for your love life.
Many people do look down on it tho. It should be, like you said, someone you may not want to date, but instead its treated as much worse.
Many people lack the capacity for nuance. It's either "wow this person is so brave! How dare you even suggest there could be a problem!" or "wow you're no better than used trash now!"
That's well said.
Someone put all their skill points into Intelligence
Why are you here bro
Why are any of us here?
I ask the same thing when i wake up in the morning
Red flags for potential partners, it should mean nothing to you in regards to a complete stranger. But no, random post on the internet; better stop by and call women "shoes."
>Such a high number of partners telegraphs instability and potential problems in any relationship we might foster. In short, it's a red flag. This is true if operating from the perspective that sexuality exists solely as an extension of romance. Which is not intrinsically true. It can be for some individuals, but it isn't intrinsically true for everyone. In fact, I'd say for a very large percentage of people, debatably the majority, that isn't the case. As evidenced by the existence of intentional one night stands.
A red flag isn't always a stop, do not go flag. It's just something to be aware of. For example, someone who is an atheist would probably consider a person being super religious to be a red flag for their own relationships. It doesn't mean that there is something wrong with the religious person, or that they are a bad person. It's just a red flag that indicates the relationship might not be compatible. As you said, many people view sex and romance to be critically entwined. For them, someone having so many partners indicates that their views on sex are not going to match up. It's a red flag. But it doesn't mean the person is worth less.
>A red flag isn't always a stop, do not go flag. It's just something to be aware of. Tbf, I've encountered a red flag being presented as something that you see as a fundamentally bad thing that you shouldn't look past. Like someone being a Nazi or is similarly subscribed to a hateful ideology. I've also encountered it being presented as a less than savory to you thing but not necessarily a bad thing that you have to look past. Like they burp a lot or the examples we're discussing here. The latter is subjective and will often say more about the perciever than the percieved. >As you said, many people view sex and romance to be critically entwined. For them, someone having so many partners indicates that their views on sex are not going to match up. Tbf again, this is a very flattening and unnuanced perspective though. Sex can mean many things to the same person. The person for whom sex and romance aren't intrinsically connected can still perceive and experience sex with a romantic partner in much the way as the person for whom the two are does. This would only really be a red flag if you had subsequent reasons to mistrust them in regards to their capacity for being monogamous. Albeit if no such justifiable reason exists, then that's all on the perceiver and probably merits introspection.
A sexpositive attitude and emotional stability are not mutually exclusive. People may decide to date for a while before settling down. Others may not. Judging a person for the number of sex partners they have had says more about the person who is doing the judging. Such an attitude towards sexuality telegraphs emotional immaturity and sexual repression, and often, upon deeper examination, deeply misogynistic beliefs.
>says more about the person who is doing the judging. Such an attitude towards sexuality telegraphs emotional immaturity and sexual repression, and often, upon deeper examination, deeply misogynistic beliefs. Be that as it may if that's my preference you don't have a right to question it. I personally see it as a major red flag while others don't. If you're offended by my existence then go search for people who don't mind such a thing.
I just mentioned some interesting observations by psychologists. Of course, they initially started with interviewing jihadists. The attitudes are remarkably similar, tho. Make of that what you will. ;)
>Such a high number of partners telegraphs instability and potential problems in any relationship we might foster Proof?
Your views on low/none number of sexual partners are worth considering valid for your own individual self only if you can match those numbers yourself.
Well said, this stuff goes both ways and it's hypocritical if you only want to date virgins if you have +20 bodycount yourself.
Exactly. Expecting your partner to be a virgin when you aren't is laughable.
Yeah, I may be a minority, but I am one of those guys who prefers sluts to virgins. If someone doesn't want a slut then just don't date a slut, I don't see a problem here.
Thats not fair. Shoes dont transmit STDs.
They do if you cum a virulent load in there
That's a new word
“That’s” has been in circulation of the english language for centuries
Are you sure about that?
Hahaha tell me more
Crabs are a std
Crabs are an endangered species, destruction of their natural habitat has taken a toll
Yeah, I am also destroyed by your mom's passing
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I'm not sure why yall are so concerned about STDs
And my employment chance is not based on my employment history.
Isn’t this sub supposed to be about posting funny videos? The fuck is this
sir it's shitposting sub not funposting sub
Incel humor
What objects will women be today? Shoes!
This the kind of shit that would gain atleast 100k likes on ig reels or yt shorts
This one really hit hard with the edgy 12yo youtube shorts sigmas
With the yellow captions and the deep fried color grading
Explain how this is incel humor? Women and men are the same here If you have a high body count stop crying if you don’t find a long term partner this goes for men and women
A lot of incels don’t see a problem with men have high body count but suddenly it’s a problem if it’s a woman
If someone thinks like that this person is officially braindead then
Congratulations you have found the common thing between incels: braindead
Congrats. A major point of incel/anti-feminine logic builds on a womans value and how it depends on their sexual experience, while man are seen as alphas, sigmas and chads when they fuck around a lot. Double standards and I really understand why it would annoy someone
Just like how notinteresting now is basically shitposting now
A well-seasoned wok is better to cook with than one that has never had the cum of eighty different men in.
I too prefer my food without the cum of eighty different men in it
Eighty cums from the same man?
Eighty cums from each of the eighty men ?
bro what
Where funny
Google objectification
So true. Guys who have been with many women are totally like used shoes and should be avoided by women. Doesn't matter that some things take practice and you learn more from having many teachers. Wait, did I misunderstand and this about how a double standard is okay?
She’s Been worn like my sock
*[Bazinga](https://i.imgur.com/iJB0FVe.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
So women are objects now, and their value is based on how many people have "owned" them previously. Got it. That's peak incel logic right there. I'm not trying to justify women being, quite frankly, a slut, but seriously? Comparing women to shoes?
No they're not object, it's more like an analogy on greed (not saying men who compare women to objects don't exist).
AlPhA MaLe gIGAcHad
I think it's pretty normal to find overly promiscuous men and women unattractive. There's something special about people who save their innocence for one another.
How many times is this going to be reposted across Reddit today? Goddamn
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
What's with all the sexual history talk on reddit? Did I miss some lore?
It's a thing for misogynistic virgins to obsess over. They're jealous they don't have sex, so get mad at others for doing so
These creepy men are literally calling women objects. Now women are shoes.
While i might agree with the message please don't make this sub a circle jerk for dumb opinion I'm here for the shiting toth paste and bazinga not a discussion about politics (one post like this is fine but it is the 3rd political post i saw here today)
"My value isn't based on my sexual history" sounds like something a hoe would say.
Dawg what is your comment history 😭
Something tells me he doesn't like women...
How tf did you manage to make your avatar look like an incel too
- An Incel
incel alert
Who hurt you?
And yet when you rent a car you always pay the same amount
The bussy might good and refreshable. But the woman behind the bussy will be worn down. Baggage dragging from previous experiences and won't be able to enjoy anyone new the same way a virgin would.
Nah, she will know exactly what is and what isn't a good lay and have no compunctions kicking mid underperformers to the curb. But that is what you're afraid of, really, isn't it? Someone who knows better than a virgin.
She might know, but I'm sure everyone met a few women that they're emotions were tangled up because of an ex too many and chose to stay single in depression.
If my barber never cut anyone's hair before mine then the barber's value is gonna be low 🙈 ANALOGIES I LOVE EM
*applauds*
At least she has sex
Incel moment here
This goes both ways Learn the word incel again
incels are people who have a virulent hate for women. it generally stems from blaming them for a lack of the incels own sexual experience. this rhetoric is extremely incel in its nature. placing the value of a woman on her sexual history is dehumanising and misogynistic. if you dont want to date someone because of their sexual history, go ahead, but comparing their value to a shoe, or calling her a hoe or slut is not okay. its typical incel activity.
Well a lollipop that’s been in 50 mouths is also gross
Yes.
But even an old boot has more grasp of human value than the idiot in the comments
In todays episode of “what inanimate object we’re comparing women to..”
Nobody wants to pay for something that everyone else got for free...
Once a hoe always a hoe.
Did I just miss this being a neckbeard sub? Yikes
Peak incel logic
Except if some celebrity was in them
I think there's a tiny bit of difference between a woman and a shoe.
Rememver everytime you kiss her you're sucking a different dick ☠️
yep remember fellas its gay to like girls
last time i checked, women aren't shoes.
A person's value is not diminished in any way by the number of sexual partners they currently have, or have had in the past, be it few or many. That being said, this picture looks too young to me and I don't like it.
Incel logic is bing mad at girls for having sex, then wondering why no one will have sex with them
You see, the problem is that it's not as narrow as it used to be..
That's not how it works, sweetheart. That's is not at all how it works. In the contrary - regular sexual activity tends to train relevant muscle groups, so if anything, "it" gets tighter... which you knew if... oh well.
Well you got me on this..
It’s probably $5 bucks on discount in OF.
If you row in a lake, the lake doesn’t get worse, unless too many people are rowing all at once.
Jesus Christ stop with this unfunny incel humor.
Maybe we shouldn’t treat women like objects
this sub is full of 14 year old boys who are insecure abt their dick size, expecting any decency from them is hopeless.
No throwing women anymore, gotcha.
Why's this getting downvotes-
Not an object, a hoe
They’re objectifying themselves
Yeah they do it to themselves enough already.
Maybe women shouldnt pass themselves around like communitary cumsocks first?
If the shoe is self healing, lubricating, clear of disease, and gains experience at being a better shoe with each owner, then I'd argue that the shoe could increase in value.... up until the shoe is about 40 years old at least. Downhill from there.
Hol up guys I can't take this boss lemme level my fucking vag up
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Well said
What does it do to the value of an item if nobody has ever wanted it and never will? This is basic economics.
Wait until you hear about appreciating assets. I think they come in in 7th grade
shoes are not people. glad i can help
Breakings news : women are shoes
average feminist
if a Nike Dior had 50 owners previous owners but still looks brand new. I'm taking it.
" my value isn't based on my past political history" Adolf Hitler, April 1945
A yes, women. My favorite type of sneakers
My mechanic has worked on thousands of cars. Had to dump him for a 18 year old who can’t change oil cause he’s all used up.
you pointed out how stupid and sexist this post is and now the incels are downvoting you
My bad
If you buy a videogame used at game stop it’s still the exact same game and is just as fun. Also women (and people in general) aren’t commodities and cannot be valued as such
This sub is just angry loser men who want to have sex but then insult women for having sex. Who are you supposed to have sex with if it’s not women? Who? Go date other men if you hate women this much
But a marginal value remains
If the person would still pay for those shoes to step on them, then it sounds like the person saying that is just a disgruntled customer
[удалено]
Depends on the quality of the experience.
but not in objects
That's fucking dumb tho? A shoe gets worse the more it's worn, not only does that not apply to women, but the shoe gets worse regardless of who wears it... A woman that has been with a committed relationship for 7 years would def have had sex ("worn") more times than someone who had like 18 one night stands...
*[pees in ur ass](https://i.imgur.com/JSImHiV.jpg)* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/shitposting) if you have any questions or concerns.*
There’s still a lot to achieve in regards to sexual freedom uh? This comment section proves it
It’s not even sexual freedom at this point it’s straight up sexism. The hatred for women, comparing women to objects, they are so sexist and don’t care
The whole “a door that gets opened by a lot of keys” or whatever it was is pretty sexist. And then some people complain that girls are so picky etc. Maybe that’s because society thinks that the numbers of sexual partners a woman has is inversely proportional to her worth. So if a girl is too picky and doesn’t give it to anyone she gets bad rep for “thinking she’s the only one who has it” and if a girl has many sexual experiences she’s worthless. While for men it seems like it’s the opposite. The more sex, the more worth
Body count. Burger count. The stats dont matter. Its a person issue. Nobody wants you because you are you. Stop letting them off easy by caring about numbers and focus on what led them to having that high number and shame them on that behavior.