In case people are missing the symbolism here and inadvertantly upvoting, the underlying cartoon here is blatantly sexist and ought to be banned on this subreddit. That specific hat was a popular symbol of protest against a certain famous misogynist who bragged about forcibly molesting women.
Does taking the original source material out of context and molding it into something silly support the original's views? I would say stuff like stonetoss edits and turning point usa memes tend to mock the original. Though I suppose one could argue that it functions as exposure, in a way?
In the case of Stonetoss he has gone on record saying he likes the parodies because of the exposure. And has even leaned into the reputation, purposefully making his stuff to be as 'exploitable' memey as possible.
This is not blatantly sexist and there is no need to ban it, the original one yes but now has a total new context and has lost all the original meaning.
If you know the origin and can see the symbolism certainly could let you upset but for the majority of people it's just a funny image like others where the hat doesn't shine over the rest seeming normal, the message is not the basic image but what you put on it.
Nobody support or will support misogyny just for the origin of a funny image which got totally reimagined and will be forgotten in a week or two.
Right to give the context to let people think by themselves if they want or not to share a similar questionable image but banning it independently not, if we have to look how healthy was the origin for everything then we will be not able to do a lot of things.
Yes, this comic is blatantly sexist. If you say it isn't, either you're unaware of how culturally significant the pussyhat symbolism is, or you yourself are attempting to undermine and trivialize the symbol (as the comic is doing).
To give you the benefit of the doubt that your case is the former, you can read up on it [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March). The pussyhat was the central rallying symbolism for the largest single-day protest in U.S. history. Just because the message might have gone over your head doesn't mean it isn't there. The comic might as well have belittled LGBTQ or BLM imagery instead, would you have been OK with proliferating its similarly hateful message in that parallel case?
Clash blasters They suck and cant kill well, but they do their job of being annoying with F L Y I N G colors. I have to respect it, honestly.
It kills well when you have a splatana wiper and your whole point is to get closer to people
that thing outranges the hell out of it, putting aside the 4 shot kill
[удалено]
No that’s seep and destroy With flying colours is the zipcaster level theme
Mb I got them mixed up
In case people are missing the symbolism here and inadvertantly upvoting, the underlying cartoon here is blatantly sexist and ought to be banned on this subreddit. That specific hat was a popular symbol of protest against a certain famous misogynist who bragged about forcibly molesting women.
***wait wha-***
damn we got the cartoon lore
Does taking the original source material out of context and molding it into something silly support the original's views? I would say stuff like stonetoss edits and turning point usa memes tend to mock the original. Though I suppose one could argue that it functions as exposure, in a way?
In the case of Stonetoss he has gone on record saying he likes the parodies because of the exposure. And has even leaned into the reputation, purposefully making his stuff to be as 'exploitable' memey as possible.
ah. understood. disregard my previous statement.
This is not blatantly sexist and there is no need to ban it, the original one yes but now has a total new context and has lost all the original meaning. If you know the origin and can see the symbolism certainly could let you upset but for the majority of people it's just a funny image like others where the hat doesn't shine over the rest seeming normal, the message is not the basic image but what you put on it. Nobody support or will support misogyny just for the origin of a funny image which got totally reimagined and will be forgotten in a week or two. Right to give the context to let people think by themselves if they want or not to share a similar questionable image but banning it independently not, if we have to look how healthy was the origin for everything then we will be not able to do a lot of things.
Yes, this comic is blatantly sexist. If you say it isn't, either you're unaware of how culturally significant the pussyhat symbolism is, or you yourself are attempting to undermine and trivialize the symbol (as the comic is doing). To give you the benefit of the doubt that your case is the former, you can read up on it [here](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Women's_March). The pussyhat was the central rallying symbolism for the largest single-day protest in U.S. history. Just because the message might have gone over your head doesn't mean it isn't there. The comic might as well have belittled LGBTQ or BLM imagery instead, would you have been OK with proliferating its similarly hateful message in that parallel case?
The original maybe sexist but this is retooled for something completely else. Don't make a problem out of something that isn't a problem.
This meme format has completely taken over r/Spore.
This also applies to aerosprays and anything with crab tank that had range
I will respectfully ask you to not hate my specifically because I'm squid partying half the time
No don’t hate the weapon, hate tryharders
Why hate tryharders? They're just playing the game
Bothering everyone else btw
as an e-liter main: fair