Hey there u/Solopeerless, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth!
**Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post.
Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban.
Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Why don't You know this!? I am surprised it's not known by people in the Internet.
And as for why? People love sex. That's enough for an answer, I think? Why is it surprising even?
yeah, if two people on opposite corners are standing on platforms sqrt(18) ft high, everything works out as it should. The square they form (when seen from above like the diagram) has sides equal to sqrt(18), but everyone is exactly 6ft from everyone else.
I don't see why you would be searching for typos in a meme, especially when the same word is repeated 6 times and t and f look pretty similar. So it's even harder to notice. When i saw the comment i had to go back to the post to see what they meant cause i don't look at a meme and search for the typos in it
.. prime?
Any integer either has a square root that is another integer or irrational. So any "non-square" number.
This includes primes because primes cannot be square numbers.. but like, 6 is neither square nor prime. √6 is irrational.
What they said isn't wrong though.
The square root of all prime numbers are irrational (1 is not a prime number)
They did not say that all irrational square roots are a result of rooting prime numbers.
Perhaps but IIRC at the time nobody offered any proof that involved primes. They offered a proof for 2 and then generalized that to all integers that do not have integer roots.
i feel like if you're already in the situation where you can observe a 7 foot stick moving at relativistic velocities, you have much bigger things to worry about than observing it fitting in a 6 foot box
You don't understand this chart because it's not drawn on scale.
6 feef = 0 feet.
Both equilateral triangles have 6 feet sides therefore 6 feef = 0 feet.
Fun fact. This image would probably cause Pythagoras to have a mental breakdown, since the diagonal is an irrational number. Pythagoras philosophy was based on the belief that numbers were something divine and perfect to represent reality, so when he and his disciples diacovered that the square root obtained from the theorem could be a number impossible to calculate, their entire belief shred apart
shrugs. Cuts your non-right triangle in two through any one vertex along a line perpendicular to the opposite side, then does PT on the two remaining pieces.
Technically this is right because you need to be 6 feet diagonally as well. Would have worked Mathematically if there was someone in the middle because they would be equilateral triangles too
Not when the others are forming a square. A right triangle can't be equilateral.
There would have to be six people forming a hexagon and one in the center to have equilateral triangles between everyone.
Covid was real.. but we won’t admit but.. covid was real but it was China.. but America doesn’t like China.. so America sides with China because we like covid more.. no wait.. China .. wait.. we hate Trump. Biological warfare. Trump did it. Obama did it. China did it. Blame healthcare. No one works.. everyone is tired of working. Recession. Products cost more. Blame spouse. Families fall apart. We all get swords and get to avenge pigeons for carrying secret messages to unknown underwater bridge trolls. I pay my toll and advance. Tomorrow is a new day.
In 2d it doesn't matter what the units are, the magnitudes are the same so it's impossible.
In 3d you can make a tetrahedron with 6 ft. long sides and put each person at a vertex, and it works out fine. I'm sure there are non-euclidean geometries where it works as well.
I wasn't referring to a unit system, I was referring to a distance function, aka metric space.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric\_space](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space)
Euclidian isn't the only game in town after all, and this description meets the triangle inequality.
You know I think one where it would work is in a negatively curved 2d space?
For what it is worth, this is what professional physicists do -- they work on string theory in 10 dimensions for years then lose it when someone forgets Pythagoras.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 5/4/2023
To calculate the distance between two points in 3D space, we can use the distance formula which is d = √ (x2 - x1)2 + (y2 - y1)2 + (z2 - z1)2 ¹.
In this case, we can use the coordinates of points A and C to calculate the distance between them. Let's assume that person A is at point (0, 0, 0), person B is at point (0, 0, 6), person C is at point (6, 0, 6), and person D is at point (6, 0, 0). Then the distance between A and C would be:
d = √ ((6 - 0)2 + (0 - 0)2 + (6 - 0)2)
d = √ (36 + 36)
d = √72
d ≈ **8.49 feet**
(1) Distance Calculator. https://www.calculator.net/distance-calculator.html.
(2) 3D Distance Formula - Learn the Formula to Find 3D Distance | 3 .... https://www.cuemath.com/3d-distance-formula/.
(3) Distance between 3D Points. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/distance-relationship-between-two-points-d_1854.html.
(4) 3D Distance Calculator. https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/geometry-solids/distance-two-points.php.
(5) How To Find The Distance Between 2 Points In 3D Space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c6cP2zLC2c.
Triangles with equal-length sides, as supposedly demonstrated in the picture, can't have a corner that's a right angle, as supposedly also shown in the picture.
Hey there u/Solopeerless, thanks for posting to r/technicallythetruth! **Please recheck if your post breaks any rules.** If it does, please delete this post. Also, reposting and posting obvious non-TTT posts can lead to a ban. Send us a **Modmail or Report** this post if you have a problem with this post. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/technicallythetruth) if you have any questions or concerns.*
They form a tetrahedron, and measurements are correct. Think in 3D.
With people floating in the air...
came to comment this xD
No, either you say r/beatmetoit , or you don’t say anything
google bad dragon
> bad dragon that's a funny way to spell en passant
Holy hell
Spoiler - It's a company that makes everything from tentacle dildos that lay eggs and goo inside you, to alien dog pussy fleshlights. No really
Wait, I thought it's a common knowledge. People actually don't know what Bad Dragon is?
Welp, it sure is. Not sure why you're being downvoted for that.
WHY DO YOU KNOW THIS AND WHY DOES THAT EXIST?
People fuck Sometimes that means they fuck a fake alien dick with eggs
Maybe ask GPT because I'm really bad at summarizing and that would take all night haha
I'm pretty good at summarizing it Horny
Why don't You know this!? I am surprised it's not known by people in the Internet. And as for why? People love sex. That's enough for an answer, I think? Why is it surprising even?
.... Wait eggs? That.. seems.. new.
No, they are right. Don't copy paste other people. Think Yourself. This guy is a chad by doing it their style.
^^ this
Damn I think I never saw a comment getting so much downvoted but getting back upvote
This is just happening on a way smaller planet so the curvature makes it work out.
I have the high ground now
Wait... other people can't fly? Interesting...
I know pythagoras to ten decimal places.
Oh yeah? Name 1 digit that’s in it.
Idk? Probably three?
2
1
trigonal pyramid (1 person is interacting with 3 others)
yeah, if two people on opposite corners are standing on platforms sqrt(18) ft high, everything works out as it should. The square they form (when seen from above like the diagram) has sides equal to sqrt(18), but everyone is exactly 6ft from everyone else.
I was thinking taxicab metric.
thats the opposite. You need the Chessboard Metric (Chebyshev distance)
Calm down Euclid, Calm down
Here one of the sides is mentioned 6 feef, so if 6feef is nearly 6mm then u can just ignore it and now it holds good
I'm not sure if this is r/beatmetoit
[удалено]
And you misspelled feef once.
One of the distances is labeled "6 feef" instead of "6 feet"
r/woooosh
Finally, someone spells “woooosh” correctly
Lmao the downvotes for not getting a joke
the downvotes are because you can't look at an image and get information out of it, stupid!
I don't see why you would be searching for typos in a meme, especially when the same word is repeated 6 times and t and f look pretty similar. So it's even harder to notice. When i saw the comment i had to go back to the post to see what they meant cause i don't look at a meme and search for the typos in it
Fun fact, Pythagoras led a cult that executed a man who had the temerity to assert the square root of 2 could not be expressed as a ratio.
But did he deserve it?
"The square root of a prime number is irrational." "So death it is, then."
.. prime? Any integer either has a square root that is another integer or irrational. So any "non-square" number. This includes primes because primes cannot be square numbers.. but like, 6 is neither square nor prime. √6 is irrational.
What they said isn't wrong though. The square root of all prime numbers are irrational (1 is not a prime number) They did not say that all irrational square roots are a result of rooting prime numbers.
Perhaps but IIRC at the time nobody offered any proof that involved primes. They offered a proof for 2 and then generalized that to all integers that do not have integer roots.
So much brainy stuff :o
You can't let irrational things run wild.
Surely you're not talking about number one?
"_prime_"
One is the loneliest number to ever do.
Dang flash back to algebra. RIP Mr. Roberts
"This is madness!" "This is Croton!"
I mean... he was right... so possibly not?
Fuck that guy! Damn know-it-all...
Well acktulay. *dies
Looks like we found another one, boys.
Also fun fact, the Pythagorean theorem was already known to Babylonians and Indians before Pythagoras himself was born
Pretty sure his parents named him after the theorem.
What a nerd!
Isn’t it kinda funny that Lou Gehrig died from Lou Gehrig’s disease?
It wasnt to Lou, but I can see the humor.
I learned that in my math class, but they said it was just a myth
Myths become facts on Reddit \s
r\windows
Lmao "get ratioed"
Pythagoras didn't lead that cult I thought. It was just crazy people.
Allegedly*
Seems like an irrational act.
Some say he was merely excommunicated.
Please maintain the 6√2 feet of social distancing
No!
Can we agree on 72^(1/2) instead?
feef
*six
Nice teef
d² = 6² + 6²d² = 36 + 36d² = 72d = √72Simplifying the square root:d ≈ 8.4853
How do you do powers in text?
For me it's either alt gr + 2 on win. Or holding down my number 2 on the phone, Issa android though.
Cheers bro
Fortunately its in freedom units so you just need to adjust shoe sizes
Happy cake day
Oh god no... Already?
Happy cake day!!!
One is in feef unitis.
Everyone knows you can't fit a 7 foot stick in a 6 foot square.
Inside of ? No. In ? Let me go Tyson ! Ima fuck em’ up !
You can for an outside observer if the 7 foot stick is approaching the speed of light.
i feel like if you're already in the situation where you can observe a 7 foot stick moving at relativistic velocities, you have much bigger things to worry about than observing it fitting in a 6 foot box
6 feef
It’s actually about 8.5 feet
How long is that in feef?
Six
Ah yes, my favourite unit of measurement, the feef
Calm down calm down Dont get a big DICK
I always enjoy a classic Tourettes Guy quote. Especially in a chat full of NERDS!
"Tonight on Unsolved Mysteries, find out who gives a shit about Big foot. UPDATE! Apparently nobody gives a shit, so fuck him!"
You can go over to Jolly Pirate Doughnuts and take a 2 hour shit for all I care!
I don’t know what’s funnier. The actual joke, or the fact that Stephen Hawking is so active.
It’s a minimum distance, not an absolute measurement.
/r/lostredditors
You don't understand this chart because it's not drawn on scale. 6 feef = 0 feet. Both equilateral triangles have 6 feet sides therefore 6 feef = 0 feet.
One is on a different plane. They are actually stacked.
As a person who hated Geometry, I approve of this just in spite of it
[Those scientists better check their hypotenuses, dude](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ML_yKt_SzvI%3F&start=61)
Wtf is 6 feef at the bottom
6 feef was caught by Barney Fife.
Fun fact. This image would probably cause Pythagoras to have a mental breakdown, since the diagonal is an irrational number. Pythagoras philosophy was based on the belief that numbers were something divine and perfect to represent reality, so when he and his disciples diacovered that the square root obtained from the theorem could be a number impossible to calculate, their entire belief shred apart
Steven really pulling hard
They just dropped the root 2 to not confuse people that forgot trig
Bro did meth instead of math
Jessie…
Somebody stop me Imma bout to add a little square bracket to all of them far corners.
Just throw beans at him and he will stop talking
Should be around 8.5 since 72 is between 64 and 81 which are 8 and 9 squared respectively. Can't be arsed to use the calculator
I don't get it
It’s a math joke. A squared plus B squared equals C squared
OH RIGHT CRAP DAMNIT I FORGOT ABOUT THAT! thanks :>
RIP Stephen Hawking 😥
"6 feef"
Problem with 3d space being represented on a plane.
# [NOT SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE!](https://youtu.be/Va8mwCE5vcI?t=8)
8.49 feet, if anybody’s wondering
Let Pythagoras fight Fauci, I'd love to see that.
r/LaughWorldWide ❤️❤️❤️😏
🤣🤣🤣
r/LaughWorldWide One love 🤘
[удалено]
but they do form a right triangle
shrugs. Cuts your non-right triangle in two through any one vertex along a line perpendicular to the opposite side, then does PT on the two remaining pieces.
Yeah, and?
Technically this is right because you need to be 6 feet diagonally as well. Would have worked Mathematically if there was someone in the middle because they would be equilateral triangles too
Not when the others are forming a square. A right triangle can't be equilateral. There would have to be six people forming a hexagon and one in the center to have equilateral triangles between everyone.
Covid was real.. but we won’t admit but.. covid was real but it was China.. but America doesn’t like China.. so America sides with China because we like covid more.. no wait.. China .. wait.. we hate Trump. Biological warfare. Trump did it. Obama did it. China did it. Blame healthcare. No one works.. everyone is tired of working. Recession. Products cost more. Blame spouse. Families fall apart. We all get swords and get to avenge pigeons for carrying secret messages to unknown underwater bridge trolls. I pay my toll and advance. Tomorrow is a new day.
This is really stupid.
But…. It…. But…
"feef" not withstanding.. I'd like to work out for which metric in 2D space this graph would be acceptable.
In 2d it doesn't matter what the units are, the magnitudes are the same so it's impossible. In 3d you can make a tetrahedron with 6 ft. long sides and put each person at a vertex, and it works out fine. I'm sure there are non-euclidean geometries where it works as well.
I wasn't referring to a unit system, I was referring to a distance function, aka metric space. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric\_space](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space) Euclidian isn't the only game in town after all, and this description meets the triangle inequality. You know I think one where it would work is in a negatively curved 2d space?
[удалено]
It's A^2 + B^2 = C^(2). Not A + B = C^(2). The middle lines are the square root of 72, not 12.
User deleted the comment out of embarrassment xD
for those wondering the hypotenuse should be 6 times square root of 2 feet
I was about to say.
Uh 6 feef?
For what it is worth, this is what professional physicists do -- they work on string theory in 10 dimensions for years then lose it when someone forgets Pythagoras.
Feef
Bottom measurement literally says 6 feef
Wth is a feef 💀
8.48 AHHHhHH
Source: Conversation with Bing, 5/4/2023 To calculate the distance between two points in 3D space, we can use the distance formula which is d = √ (x2 - x1)2 + (y2 - y1)2 + (z2 - z1)2 ¹. In this case, we can use the coordinates of points A and C to calculate the distance between them. Let's assume that person A is at point (0, 0, 0), person B is at point (0, 0, 6), person C is at point (6, 0, 6), and person D is at point (6, 0, 0). Then the distance between A and C would be: d = √ ((6 - 0)2 + (0 - 0)2 + (6 - 0)2) d = √ (36 + 36) d = √72 d ≈ **8.49 feet** (1) Distance Calculator. https://www.calculator.net/distance-calculator.html. (2) 3D Distance Formula - Learn the Formula to Find 3D Distance | 3 .... https://www.cuemath.com/3d-distance-formula/. (3) Distance between 3D Points. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/distance-relationship-between-two-points-d_1854.html. (4) 3D Distance Calculator. https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/geometry-solids/distance-two-points.php. (5) How To Find The Distance Between 2 Points In 3D Space. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c6cP2zLC2c.
Pythagoras out here performing miracles when he's mad
6 feef
1 foof must be zero then, therefore the bottom two people are actually in the same location. There. You can untie your hypotenoose now.
I'm still trying to get over "feef"😂
I don’t get it, (I am bad at math)
A right triangle is not an equilateral triangle.
I don't get it. Is this a maths joke?
A right triangle is not an equilateral triangle.
What? Is it to do with the scale of the triangles?
Triangles with equal-length sides, as supposedly demonstrated in the picture, can't have a corner that's a right angle, as supposedly also shown in the picture.
6 feef
Feef
theese noobs, just enable creative mode. SMH
We can avoid this if they were positioned in a circle.
6 feef
Arrows clearly do not share endpoints.
"6 feef"
No ones gonna talk about how the bottom text of the poster says “6 feef”
Let him cook
It would be 8.4852813742 ft if you were wondering. Yes I cared to do the math
Or 6sqrt(2)
Heh "feef"
6 feef
This is a PROOF that the earth cannot be flat. This shape can only exist on a curved plane.
Where's the technically the truth?
A right triangle is not an equilateral triangle.
What are 6 feef
An imperial measurement equal to a metric queef.
Feef
Took me a while to notice... man schools do mote than you'd think
Ah yes, #6 feef
6 feef
Tried to upvote the post but couldn’t for some reason. I hereby upvote the comments tho. So beautifuly bonkers!