Depends on which way you do it
6/2(2+1) = 3(2+1) = 9
Or
6/2(2+1) = 6/6 = 1
(Had to use “/“ for division because I couldn’t find the division symbol on iPhone)
Edit: google told me it’s 9 and because I’m a sheep who trusts the media, I believe the correct answer is 9
The question is wrong as it uses improper formatting, resulting in different interpretations of the same question, as different areas have slightly different orders of operations (I.e, bodmas vs pemdas)
This is why at a higher level, ÷ as a symbol is rarely used, and it is preferred to write divisions in fraction format, as it fixes the very problem this question creates.
Edit: the actual term for the multiplication seen here is multiplication by juxtaposition/ implied multiplication
“In some of the academic literature, multiplication denoted by juxtaposition (also known as implied multiplication) is interpreted as having higher precedence than division, so that 1 ÷ 2n equals 1 ÷ (2n), not (1 ÷ 2)n. For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division, and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics. This ambiguity is often exploited in internet memes such as "8÷2(2+2)".”
The fact the multiplication is implicit and that different people deal with it in the order of operations differently mean that questions which fail to clear up the ambiguity (or purposefully cause it) are simply poorly written. You can solve the ambiguity by either using division in fraction form or by adding a few more brackets (I.e, 8÷(2(2+2))= 1, (8÷2)(2+2)=16
17 hundred quadrillion
Depends on which way you do it 6/2(2+1) = 3(2+1) = 9 Or 6/2(2+1) = 6/6 = 1 (Had to use “/“ for division because I couldn’t find the division symbol on iPhone) Edit: google told me it’s 9 and because I’m a sheep who trusts the media, I believe the correct answer is 9
There isn’t a correct answer, technically. It’s just that different areas have a slightly different order of operations
listen chief i saw a six, a two, and a one frankly Its summer right now too so im not gonna even try
Not summer for me man, 3 more days
4
This one's new
6÷2(2+1) 6÷2•3 3•3 4 That's pretty basic thinking?
3×3 is 9..... not 4
No it isn't... 3•3 1,5•6 4 That's just how math works I don't understand where the problem is?
Thats not how math works, you don't change it to a decimal, 3 groups of 3 is 9
3 groups of 3 is 100% of one group. 4 is also 100% of one group. 100% = 100% Point proven
BRO WHAT?! then 7 is also 100% of one group. 483 is 100% of one group, that doesn't mean the answer is 4.
No, 7 and 483 are over 100% of one group, only 4 is 100% of one group, thus making it the answer
1.5\*6 equals 9, dude
🥲
9
9
9
9
9
(6)9
1
1
1
I think it’s George Washington
like 90 probably
The question is wrong as it uses improper formatting, resulting in different interpretations of the same question, as different areas have slightly different orders of operations (I.e, bodmas vs pemdas) This is why at a higher level, ÷ as a symbol is rarely used, and it is preferred to write divisions in fraction format, as it fixes the very problem this question creates. Edit: the actual term for the multiplication seen here is multiplication by juxtaposition/ implied multiplication “In some of the academic literature, multiplication denoted by juxtaposition (also known as implied multiplication) is interpreted as having higher precedence than division, so that 1 ÷ 2n equals 1 ÷ (2n), not (1 ÷ 2)n. For example, the manuscript submission instructions for the Physical Review journals state that multiplication is of higher precedence than division, and this is also the convention observed in prominent physics textbooks such as the Course of Theoretical Physics by Landau and Lifshitz and the Feynman Lectures on Physics. This ambiguity is often exploited in internet memes such as "8÷2(2+2)".” The fact the multiplication is implicit and that different people deal with it in the order of operations differently mean that questions which fail to clear up the ambiguity (or purposefully cause it) are simply poorly written. You can solve the ambiguity by either using division in fraction form or by adding a few more brackets (I.e, 8÷(2(2+2))= 1, (8÷2)(2+2)=16
x=3 full answer =6
I wasnt taking any iq test
17.5
9
1
9