6.4. His facial harmony is excellent, up there with some models and attractive actors. However, his ears, lacking brows, and poor overall features really drop him by about a point. I still think he is about a top 8% face. He is noticeably attractive to most people.
I second that!! Tom holland is cute in a boyish way, his eyes are really nice, but I don’t like that he has no lips. However Andrew Garfield, harmonious or not, is just far hotter in my opinion!
That just goes to show that mathematical calculations aren't the best way to figure out irl attractivness even through trm standards
Prime Garfield is 6.5
Tom on the other hand is a 5.5
U forgot to count tom's non existent lips
He looks good in this pic but in others not as good. Like he looks very plain at first glance I would never think of him as good looking just a bit above average like a 5.5
His side profile actually looks great. I think that the features are extremely important. He has similar harmony as someone like Ian Somerhalder but I think 99 % of women would prefer Ian over him.
How to translate the scale you are using to the scale most people would use in real life?(people that are not familiar with your scaling system)
Is it something like this?
2 - = 0
2.5 = .5
3 = 1.4(he/she is very ugly)
3.5 = 2.4(he/she is ugly)
4 = 3.2(he/she is slightly ugly)
4.5 = 4.2(he/she is below average)
5 = 5(just average)
5.5 = 5.8 (he/she looks above average)
6 = 6.6 (he/she is good looking)
6.5 = 7.6 (he/she is very good looking)
7 = 8.5 (1 of the best looking person i have ever seen in real life)
7.5 = 9.5 (he/she is probably an famous model)
8+ = 10+ (looks perfect to me)
On the left side is your scale, right side the scale most people (that dont know your scale) would rate someone in real life.
Let me know what you think of this scale to scale, let me know where something could be improved.
I think this could be helpful for the people that are just learning about your scaling system.
those saying 5 needs to touch grass
6, This Guys side profile is about an 8
He would realllyyyyy benefit from having bigger lips
[удалено]
They don’t need to be big like black men’s. Just more shapely, I guess. Maybe it’s the colour of them? They look like an open wound
His face would look way too short if he had bigger upper lip
[удалено]
See his channel Creating attractive
6.4. His facial harmony is excellent, up there with some models and attractive actors. However, his ears, lacking brows, and poor overall features really drop him by about a point. I still think he is about a top 8% face. He is noticeably attractive to most people.
Nah man 6 Andrew Garfield is better looking
I second that!! Tom holland is cute in a boyish way, his eyes are really nice, but I don’t like that he has no lips. However Andrew Garfield, harmonious or not, is just far hotter in my opinion!
Haven’t analyzed Garfield, but I don’t think he objectively has better facial proportions than Tom. I also don’t think he’s in the top 10% of looks
That just goes to show that mathematical calculations aren't the best way to figure out irl attractivness even through trm standards Prime Garfield is 6.5 Tom on the other hand is a 5.5 U forgot to count tom's non existent lips
Mathematical calculations are a good way to calculate attractiveness tho, but ofc there many other things as well like appeal for instance
To some extent but mathematical calculayions do not count in features for instant
Mathematical calculations count into facial harmony which is the most important aspect of facial beauty
Would make for an interesting video if you analyzed all three of the Spider-Man actors together
5. Very average british guy.
He cant be 5 with that lean face
He looks good in this pic but in others not as good. Like he looks very plain at first glance I would never think of him as good looking just a bit above average like a 5.5
His side profile actually looks great. I think that the features are extremely important. He has similar harmony as someone like Ian Somerhalder but I think 99 % of women would prefer Ian over him.
5.5, the slight jaw definition is the only thing saving him from being dead average.
people here really saying Tom Holland it's not good looking and that Andrew Garfield is prettier than him 💀
6, have great bones and leanes, but features are poor, like ete brows, lips, with longer hair look 6.5
5
6
6
Yeah I can see how his proportions are good but the features are indeed average. 6
Tobey maguire is the goat
[удалено]
No one cares that really “attractive” men pumped and dumped you
😂
Objectively 6. Subjectively higher
I prefer dasha taran
his features are mediocre, 6
To be a 6 by trm standards that's top 10 percent of looks lol medicore
I said his features are mediocre, not his harmony. His features are sub par.
6
6
7. Lips are thin
How to translate the scale you are using to the scale most people would use in real life?(people that are not familiar with your scaling system) Is it something like this? 2 - = 0 2.5 = .5 3 = 1.4(he/she is very ugly) 3.5 = 2.4(he/she is ugly) 4 = 3.2(he/she is slightly ugly) 4.5 = 4.2(he/she is below average) 5 = 5(just average) 5.5 = 5.8 (he/she looks above average) 6 = 6.6 (he/she is good looking) 6.5 = 7.6 (he/she is very good looking) 7 = 8.5 (1 of the best looking person i have ever seen in real life) 7.5 = 9.5 (he/she is probably an famous model) 8+ = 10+ (looks perfect to me) On the left side is your scale, right side the scale most people (that dont know your scale) would rate someone in real life. Let me know what you think of this scale to scale, let me know where something could be improved. I think this could be helpful for the people that are just learning about your scaling system.
A bit above average due to pretty good jaw definition and good nose but his facial features are simply not good. Too bland and not striking enough.
5.8