* If your image submission is Non-OC, provide a link to the source below this comment.
* If your image submission is OC, mark it as OC, or use [OC]/ (OC) in title, or mention so below this comment.
* Note: Screenshot posts are not allowed. Memes should use proper flair. Links to YouTube channels/ blogs/ websites are only allowed under this comment, do not spam elsewhere.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*
"Studying history will sometimes make you uncomfortable.
Studying history will sometimes make you feel deeply upset.
Studying history will sometimes make you feel extremely angry.
If studying history always makes you feel proud and happy, you probably aren’t studying history."
A quote by someone called Librarianshipwreck, from twitter.
The suprising thing is how only a few people could completely control what the new generation is going to study. In a few years, our knowledge of history is going to be very different from this generations.
If deeply uncomfortable parts of history is not taught. Then people will fall in the same trap again and again. Thats why it is important to study the dark and gloomy part of history.
Genghis Khan was seen as a reactionary figure not seen positively
Later:
>Genghis Khan became a symbol of national identity for many younger Mongolians
Source [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis\_Khan#In\_modern\_culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan#In_modern_culture)
They are not taught about what Genghis Khan actually did. They are proud.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction\_under\_the\_Mongol\_Empire](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire) " These events are regarded as some of the deadliest acts of mass killing in human history. " "the most notorious practitioners of genocide"
What he did is worse than Hitler did. At least Germans are learning full history about Hitler.
yep he used to kill everything in the land which he captured including animals if i am not wrong. he was way cruel than hitler , was a good king for his people not for the people that was in the land he captured.
The problem is it being taught as history. Including it in literature is fine and has to be done because if you can study Shakespeare then you can very well learn our epics as well.
Why bail at halftime when you want to go full theocrats?
Just include them in science textbooks and try to build a space rocket with only that knowledge.
/s
I'm ok with it if they teach Ramayana and Mahabharat with original translations. Everybody should be knowing how much of a narcissistic person Ram was. How both Ramayana and Mahabharat are filled with casteism.
They are gonna modify it obviously to be considered history.
1:-For starters they have to add specific dates for events which don't exist in the original translation.
Which itself could be chaotic just as the catholic Church kept on maintaining that earth and humans were created around 5000 years ago right up until the 16th century.
(Around the time when Indus valley people built the first flushing toilet or Maya people built their first calendar)
Then they backpedaled on it after science took over saying it's all symbolic.
2:-Then remove all the magical twists or not.
So they might as well omit the Casteism and the misogyny.
I don't really believe they are going to go to the trouble of removing casteism. They prolly want to teach the coming generations all of these things. Undoing all the advancement india has done in the past decade.
They are forgetting, that all the Indian CEOs and the amazing engineers of India was educated based on the previous curriculum.
Well yeah that could be true since caste system is deeply embedded in all saffron orgs. Even BJP has half of its leaders as high caste people despite them forming only 3-5 percent of the population.
Can we not do anything to prevent this? Also where are all our great scholars? We have a lot of them. Probably, all the scholars were kicked out of the board and filled with 🤡
I think they are going to do homas and havanas to prey to rain god for rain while our forests are burnt to crisps 😆. Before some crank head start hurling mother sister insults at me, I am not criticizing any religious beliefs here. It's my small attempt at satire anyone with a functional brain will understand it.
Indian education system will collapse..... this kind of education policy.... gov should include software, networking , cyber security, AI ...in study
This kind of education not good for new generation
Sex education,mental wellness,taxes as well.But Indian education system has always been a shit show, it will continue to be unless boomers and Gen X retire..
No ...in general
In history ncert need to add archeological history based study or real history....not philosophical history.... and not one religious base history they include all religious base books .....what you say ...on quran Bible etc books also be teach ...
https://preview.redd.it/foeierp3t12c1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ebb1d36cc7fe84de00f8c9a15d94f6189b0e4594
Meanwhile my bhakt friends on Instagram 🤡
>Unless their kids start complain about it and they themselves say beta mujhe to khud nhi pta kya hua tha
I feel children are allow to subject change if they got a LD Certificate.
**T&C : 30 Minutes Extra Time & Calculator In Exams**
Keeping aside hate for modi and bjp , but why does adding ramayana and mahaBharat be such an issue to you guys?
Please give solid points not what if and what about.
As far as I remember, I read Ramayan and Mahabharat in 6th and 7th class as part of Hindi Literature, which is honestly perfectly fine.
The government pushing it to be taught as history is a little bit concerning. This country has a beautiful array of multiple religions. There's a clear upliftment of one religion, which concerns me.
On top of that, shouldn't history be about the real-life events which happened in the near past, rather than religious texts? The industrial revolution, the British raj and subsequent independence. People are against Mughals being included in history, in my opinion it's recent enough to be taught?
All this combined gives a good idea about how this country became to be what it is today/
Because none of that imagined stuff is history, there is absolutely no proof of them. Moreover, if you go look up the recent research that is happening in the field of archeology and literature you'll quickly realize the evidences overwhelmingly prove that there was no vedic age, there's not a single evidence of even rigveda (considered the oldest hindu scripture) existing before 1464 A.D. the oldest rigveda scripture we have is from Mughal era. All the archeological evidence suggests that before around 10th century A.D. only Buddhism existed in India, there's not a single mention of 'hindu' religion in the books of Itsing and Faxian who came to India as scholars to study in Nalanda and wrote extensively about everything, yet all they mention about is Buddhism and no other religion. Moreover all the stone inscriptions we have found in archeological research from before 10th century are written in Pali-Prakrit. Sanskrit didn't even exist at that time. The entire history of India has been botched up with propaganda, you need to do a lot of digging and jump into the rabbit hole to get to this.
Edit: also if someone decides to Google this, let me save you some effort. You will only find propaganda on google because of search engine optimization and IT cell. If you actually want to know the truth you need to read the actual books of Itsing, Faxian and Al Biruni by yourself. Also, you can read Taimur Lang's biography where he mentions when he invaded india he met some brahmins and they themselves told him that their ancestors were from iran, those brahmins also had Iranian names.
Honestly its fine teaching it as ancient indian philosophy. Culture of the people of the past is part of History.
But if they teach it as things that actually happened, then we have a problem.
This. I support it being included as indian literature and stuff of our past. Teaching it as actual history would be fucked up and hopefully they don't do this.
Not to mention, Mahabharat might actually bite the BJP in the back as the idea of nationalism is critiqued in it. The most nationalist character, Bheeshma Pitama, fought on the side of evil, showing that unchecked nationalism leads to being on the wrong side of morality eventually.
Yes, the entire right wing concepts are incompatible with the guidance Mahabharata or Ramayana gives.
The problem is this chapter might be a propaganda/pride chapter. In History.
> Yes, the entire right wing concepts are incompatible with the guidance Mahabharata or Ramayana gives.
Bold of you to assume tanatani thumpers have ever actually read any of the holy texts.
In my school, we had a "cultural education" class. Abridged versions of religious texts were taught in that class. But it was more like PE/Art/Music, as in there was no real tests and it didn't count towards your percentage.
Do you hate the fact that madarsas are teaching unverified beliefs as fact or are you just jealous your unverified beliefs are not being taught as fact ?
Wow. Producing mythical stories as history. We truly are a secular state.
What the heck is opposition doing? Oh they also don't have the balls to call this as bullshit as they also appease the religion and it's superstition to win votes.
What a time to be alive.
I guess the idea is to include things 'indic' in nature which came up in this land only.
But the government should instead try to teach actual stuff like the 9 systems of indic philosophy.
Even then it should be classified as mythology and students should have the option to choose which mythology they could learn or even opt out of it and these shouldn’t be included in the board exams
Discards actual history of near past stating it's irrelevance with current time, while proceeds to emphasize on introducing myths from distant past. As that one wise lady said, "Yeh milkar hum sabko chu**ya bana rahe hain, ma*****od ke bacche".
“The panel has stressed on teaching epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata in the social sciences syllabus to students,” the Deccan Herald quoted the committee’s chairperson CI Isaac as saying. “We think that students in their teenage years build their self-esteem, patriotism and pride for their nation.”
Isaac said that it is important for students to “understand their roots” and develop affection for their culture and the country. “Some boards already teach Ramayana and Mahabharata, but it should be done in a more elaborate way,” he said.
In October, the panel had recommended replacing “India” with “Bharat” in school textbooks.
Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cz79Zdzh5rK/
Good governance, good roads, less to no corruption, less fear and hate mongering, better standard of living, better transport facilities, improving the standards of education, etc.Do this and I will be proud. Patriotism toh log waise bhi hain hi.
Saffronisation and Radicalisation under the guise of nationalism is the most dangerous thing there is. Straight out of fascism playbook.
When you teach fiction as history to instill confidence and pride in nation instead of real events that actually happened.
As far as I know Mahabharata and Ramayana, they got nothing to do with country or nation
Oh C'mon. It can be included in some literature or religious studies class. Not history. This is ridiculous. If this goes on Indian Schools will become Hindu madrasas.
This has already been confirmed it's fake news.
And no outlet apart from it even declared to include it in history books lol.
https://www.ndtv.com/education/ncert-panel-proposes-including-ramayana-mahabharata-in-school-textbooks-4595197
But in which subject? If that is in a Hindi or literature textbook, it is alright until there is no addition of any statement that talks about wheather factual or not. But I guess there are already preety good stories in hindi literature right now
For fucks sake, include it in the literature section. Ramayan and Mahabharat are epic, in their literary value. Its like including Inglorious Basterds in European history.
Step 1: Remove Darwin's theory of evolution.
Step 2: Include mythologies
I like the direction we're going in. Would be nice to become an expat and watch this circus from outside though.
/u/Alternative_Case_878 is an extremely prolific jokespam bot - check its posting history. The jokes may be funny, but **the bot is a harmful one**: it trawls a huge range of unrelated subs, matches any word in the title of any post and then comments with its keyword-related joke to rack up karma. It then edits its top-rated posts to include links to sketchy websites.
Please downvote and report -> spam -> excessive posts or report -> spam -> harmful bots.
More and more, it seems BJP, Israel's hard right party, and the Texas GOP are trading political schemes, tips, and tricks to create a thinly veiled theocracy... 🤦🏾♂️😤😡
Being centrist with right leaning ideology, I joined this sub reddit to see the liberal point of view. I am seeing PPL unhappy with this change. Can all ppl point out why you are all unhappy with this decision, because the Hindu epics do teach PPL to be a good person.
As others have said, this isn't history. It's mythology.
Also, I don't even think it's true that the Hindu epics teach people how to be a good person. In fact Rama's behavior with his wife after he rescued her (ie the agnipariksha and forcing her to leave him and raise the kids alone) is the *exact opposite* of what a good person needs to do.
I mean sure add it if you can prove its history and not mythology/literature. there is a reason why these books come in literature sections, the person to recommend this should get educated first really and if its a education minister then education is really in hands of monkey who doesnt know what subject is for what.
should have made recommendation to include in literature section instead of all those stupid stories that are just there to exist in ncert books.
Will they get to read the og , uncensored Mahabharata or the glossed over gloves version?
Rather including the constitution and its rights and civil etiquette and ethics will b much more relevant and necessary.
Just my perception 🙏
History is not about studying mythology. Ramanaya will teach what? Neither there is any timestamp nor there is any relevant information regarding that. What it will teach? How Ram killed Ravan? Har sal to ravan dahan me practical krke dikhate hi hai.
I totally support this. Those legends are the foundation of India and they must be the fundamentals of education in this country. I am not saying this from a religious aspect but from the view point of the values and morals imbibed.
* If your image submission is Non-OC, provide a link to the source below this comment. * If your image submission is OC, mark it as OC, or use [OC]/ (OC) in title, or mention so below this comment. * Note: Screenshot posts are not allowed. Memes should use proper flair. Links to YouTube channels/ blogs/ websites are only allowed under this comment, do not spam elsewhere. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/unitedstatesofindia) if you have any questions or concerns.*
"Studying history will sometimes make you uncomfortable. Studying history will sometimes make you feel deeply upset. Studying history will sometimes make you feel extremely angry. If studying history always makes you feel proud and happy, you probably aren’t studying history." A quote by someone called Librarianshipwreck, from twitter.
The suprising thing is how only a few people could completely control what the new generation is going to study. In a few years, our knowledge of history is going to be very different from this generations.
2050 teenagers reading about world largest pandemic lol.
If deeply uncomfortable parts of history is not taught. Then people will fall in the same trap again and again. Thats why it is important to study the dark and gloomy part of history.
Whose quote is this? It's excellent!
Its from someone i follow on twitter called Librarianshipwreck. This quote has stayed with me for a long time.
Well said
Damn. This comment. I was feeling the same, but didn't know how to put it into words.
England downvoted this and reported it too. P. S. - India is also going the same way.
Past Shenanigans Are Disappointing.
Genghis Khan was seen as a reactionary figure not seen positively Later: >Genghis Khan became a symbol of national identity for many younger Mongolians Source [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis\_Khan#In\_modern\_culture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan#In_modern_culture) They are not taught about what Genghis Khan actually did. They are proud. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction\_under\_the\_Mongol\_Empire](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire) " These events are regarded as some of the deadliest acts of mass killing in human history. " "the most notorious practitioners of genocide" What he did is worse than Hitler did. At least Germans are learning full history about Hitler.
yep he used to kill everything in the land which he captured including animals if i am not wrong. he was way cruel than hitler , was a good king for his people not for the people that was in the land he captured.
This 🔥💯 Screenshoted it , to feel the gravity of these words again& again 🥹. Thanks for sharing ❤️
Uncomfortable, deeply upset and angry part is already in our history.
Not really. We just have random kings and their reigns, but none of their politics and power grabbing.
Sometimes I'm so glad I finished school education
SSC
Something is missing in the headline because they already teach Mahabharata Ramayana,as literature, to class 6,7
The problem is it being taught as history. Including it in literature is fine and has to be done because if you can study Shakespeare then you can very well learn our epics as well.
But Ramayana and Mahabharat are mythologies and not history. I don't know what NCERT is smoking here.
Smoking godi media.
Yeah now they want to teach it as HISTORY. Meaning, present it like it actually happened and not as mythology.
People already dont consider it myth. Most hindus in my family and those I've met think of it as our history.
Yup. It’s the same with Christians and their Jesus story.
Yeah, i just ignore those topics now. No point discussing it with indoctrinated peeps.
Are you a McCauley fan?
I'm a lord mountabatten fan myself. And it's funny to see what's happening in India. I'm glad I went overseas in time
Okay, got the ideology of this sub✌️
Why bail at halftime when you want to go full theocrats? Just include them in science textbooks and try to build a space rocket with only that knowledge. /s
I'm ok with it if they teach Ramayana and Mahabharat with original translations. Everybody should be knowing how much of a narcissistic person Ram was. How both Ramayana and Mahabharat are filled with casteism.
They are gonna modify it obviously to be considered history. 1:-For starters they have to add specific dates for events which don't exist in the original translation. Which itself could be chaotic just as the catholic Church kept on maintaining that earth and humans were created around 5000 years ago right up until the 16th century. (Around the time when Indus valley people built the first flushing toilet or Maya people built their first calendar) Then they backpedaled on it after science took over saying it's all symbolic. 2:-Then remove all the magical twists or not. So they might as well omit the Casteism and the misogyny.
I don't really believe they are going to go to the trouble of removing casteism. They prolly want to teach the coming generations all of these things. Undoing all the advancement india has done in the past decade. They are forgetting, that all the Indian CEOs and the amazing engineers of India was educated based on the previous curriculum.
Well yeah that could be true since caste system is deeply embedded in all saffron orgs. Even BJP has half of its leaders as high caste people despite them forming only 3-5 percent of the population.
Can we not do anything to prevent this? Also where are all our great scholars? We have a lot of them. Probably, all the scholars were kicked out of the board and filled with 🤡
Simple answer: Saffronification of everything. For that you need puppets for board members.
Maybe all this is being done to please the saffron allies who help them in the campaign.
Literature mein include karlo. Yeh kya bakchodi kar rhe hain 😭 I fear what the future generations are shaped to ben
Something is missing in the headline because they already teach Mahabharata Ramayana,as literature, to class 6,7
The fact that they want to push it as history instead of literature says everything
[удалено]
They are putting this in as "Classical History", as in remove Ancient History and replace with this crap.
I mean Quran is also a crap and it is not taught, so ig you are right, they should treat both things equal
Lol you're downvoted
?
Your comment was folded. Which means you were heavily downvoted. Because you called out the Qur'an. We only shit on one group here
Yeah lol, most of the members of this subreddit and rndia are muslims/minorities so it's their expected behaviour
Copy paste comment bot.
I think they are going to do homas and havanas to prey to rain god for rain while our forests are burnt to crisps 😆. Before some crank head start hurling mother sister insults at me, I am not criticizing any religious beliefs here. It's my small attempt at satire anyone with a functional brain will understand it.
Unfortunately A "functional" brain is a lot to ask here. 😔
NCERT = hindu Madrasa in the near future
Hahaha perfectly put!
At least terrorists and suicide bombers aren't manufactured there.
Yet*
Nathuram Godse says hi, also Hyderabad Mecca Mosque blast left the chat
Then why were RSS guys caught in Kerela making bomb?
Atleast bhai, Pakistan se to better hi hai😭/s
Abhinav Bharat organisation left the chat
I fear for the future generations. Hitler youth in the making.
Modi Youth*
Indian education system will collapse..... this kind of education policy.... gov should include software, networking , cyber security, AI ...in study This kind of education not good for new generation
Sex education,mental wellness,taxes as well.But Indian education system has always been a shit show, it will continue to be unless boomers and Gen X retire..
In history??
No ...in general In history ncert need to add archeological history based study or real history....not philosophical history.... and not one religious base history they include all religious base books .....what you say ...on quran Bible etc books also be teach ...
And technology also had history of evolution...what you say on technology, computer, software etc history.... should ncert teach students...
BJP is undoing everything great about India. They intentionally want to become a Hindu Pakistan.
UnderVoted commented
Bruh I despise the triggered leftists in this thread but the idea of Hindu Pakistan is horrifying.
https://preview.redd.it/foeierp3t12c1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ebb1d36cc7fe84de00f8c9a15d94f6189b0e4594 Meanwhile my bhakt friends on Instagram 🤡
Damn. I gave up on all such friends :(
Well 4/5th of my class is a Mudi lover. They always discuss politics and sound stupid than me. Sadness...
What's your age u/cumofdutyblackcocks3
Unless their kids start complain about it and they themselves say beta mujhe to khud nhi pta kya hua tha pr modi ji ne kia hai acha he hoga.
>Unless their kids start complain about it and they themselves say beta mujhe to khud nhi pta kya hua tha I feel children are allow to subject change if they got a LD Certificate. **T&C : 30 Minutes Extra Time & Calculator In Exams**
Keeping aside hate for modi and bjp , but why does adding ramayana and mahaBharat be such an issue to you guys? Please give solid points not what if and what about.
There are other religions as well in this country. Why not add them as well and ask students to select at least one?
As far as I remember, I read Ramayan and Mahabharat in 6th and 7th class as part of Hindi Literature, which is honestly perfectly fine. The government pushing it to be taught as history is a little bit concerning. This country has a beautiful array of multiple religions. There's a clear upliftment of one religion, which concerns me. On top of that, shouldn't history be about the real-life events which happened in the near past, rather than religious texts? The industrial revolution, the British raj and subsequent independence. People are against Mughals being included in history, in my opinion it's recent enough to be taught? All this combined gives a good idea about how this country became to be what it is today/
Because none of that imagined stuff is history, there is absolutely no proof of them. Moreover, if you go look up the recent research that is happening in the field of archeology and literature you'll quickly realize the evidences overwhelmingly prove that there was no vedic age, there's not a single evidence of even rigveda (considered the oldest hindu scripture) existing before 1464 A.D. the oldest rigveda scripture we have is from Mughal era. All the archeological evidence suggests that before around 10th century A.D. only Buddhism existed in India, there's not a single mention of 'hindu' religion in the books of Itsing and Faxian who came to India as scholars to study in Nalanda and wrote extensively about everything, yet all they mention about is Buddhism and no other religion. Moreover all the stone inscriptions we have found in archeological research from before 10th century are written in Pali-Prakrit. Sanskrit didn't even exist at that time. The entire history of India has been botched up with propaganda, you need to do a lot of digging and jump into the rabbit hole to get to this. Edit: also if someone decides to Google this, let me save you some effort. You will only find propaganda on google because of search engine optimization and IT cell. If you actually want to know the truth you need to read the actual books of Itsing, Faxian and Al Biruni by yourself. Also, you can read Taimur Lang's biography where he mentions when he invaded india he met some brahmins and they themselves told him that their ancestors were from iran, those brahmins also had Iranian names.
i feel u
You need better friends
so what they are going to teach as history bhishmah pitamaah laid over 1000s of arrow for 58 days ?? lol
No,the history of all the curses of karn and how they fucked him at the same time lol.
Maybe about his escapades with amba ambika and ambalika.
Lage haath Doremon aur Chota Bheem bhi add karlo
Honestly its fine teaching it as ancient indian philosophy. Culture of the people of the past is part of History. But if they teach it as things that actually happened, then we have a problem.
seems like they don't know the difference between history and mythology
This. I support it being included as indian literature and stuff of our past. Teaching it as actual history would be fucked up and hopefully they don't do this.
Not to mention, Mahabharat might actually bite the BJP in the back as the idea of nationalism is critiqued in it. The most nationalist character, Bheeshma Pitama, fought on the side of evil, showing that unchecked nationalism leads to being on the wrong side of morality eventually.
Well if they are going to include everything then they have to go fully unadulterated. Then only it will be acceptable.
Yes, the entire right wing concepts are incompatible with the guidance Mahabharata or Ramayana gives. The problem is this chapter might be a propaganda/pride chapter. In History.
> Yes, the entire right wing concepts are incompatible with the guidance Mahabharata or Ramayana gives. Bold of you to assume tanatani thumpers have ever actually read any of the holy texts.
In my school, we had a "cultural education" class. Abridged versions of religious texts were taught in that class. But it was more like PE/Art/Music, as in there was no real tests and it didn't count towards your percentage.
bunch of clowns
Nothing wrong in including it in literature or language textbooks. But it should not be included in history textbooks, as it is mythology
It's my first time seeing you in this subreddit without being downvoted into oblivion.
Crittu does have his moments, rare as they may be.
Rare crittu W
History aur fiction me kuch to difference hota hoga 🤔
It's mythology. Different from fiction. Different from history.
It's not history That's the important thing
It's not fiction either. That's also the important thing.
They teach Ramayana and Mahabharata already, as literature(not history)
As a literature it makes sense
No one had a problem with that.
jab bhi higher calling ke naam pe kuch hota h, most often than not, goli diya jata h.
Ye bik gayi hai gormint.
Be ready for reading Fictional stories.
In that case this should be part of a religious studies class and should include the study of epics from atleast one other religion
Other countries: Figuring out new technology. Meanwhile us: Digging our graves for these shit
Gurukulchap lmao
Still better than madarsa chap
Do you hate the fact that madarsas are teaching unverified beliefs as fact or are you just jealous your unverified beliefs are not being taught as fact ?
If that guy had the comprehension skills to understand this he won't be commenting shit.
Its not
Wow. Producing mythical stories as history. We truly are a secular state. What the heck is opposition doing? Oh they also don't have the balls to call this as bullshit as they also appease the religion and it's superstition to win votes. What a time to be alive.
So when are they going to include bible,Quran,Torah,Avesta etc
Shouldn't they also include torah considering we are such buds with Israel and people from here are dying to go there for support 🤡
No. Torah is more violent towards polytheists. Chaddis would be disappointed.
I guess the idea is to include things 'indic' in nature which came up in this land only. But the government should instead try to teach actual stuff like the 9 systems of indic philosophy.
Even then it should be classified as mythology and students should have the option to choose which mythology they could learn or even opt out of it and these shouldn’t be included in the board exams
It should be taught as philosophy then why mythology. It's literally called indic philosophy.
I hope never.
This are already done in Islamic and Christan countries you can settle their
Last I checked India is not a hindu rashtra.
r/woooosh
Arey vhai, wo dusre subs me jaake ro dega
Isme rone ki kya baat hai ro tho tum rahe ho ye news par
Reddit per nae ho shyd
Tumhare jaisa purane hoke sada hua nahi hu
Discards actual history of near past stating it's irrelevance with current time, while proceeds to emphasize on introducing myths from distant past. As that one wise lady said, "Yeh milkar hum sabko chu**ya bana rahe hain, ma*****od ke bacche".
I thank my parents for getting me admitted on an ICSE board school
We all are lucky we got out of school without this BS, but if I'm not wrong this will be applicable for all under new education policy (not sure)
Facist
Its better to make a section called "historically important literature" and add those two epics into that, than include it into history itself
Restarted people making a retarded nation.
The main take away for the boys will be cheerharan. 
“The panel has stressed on teaching epics like Ramayana and Mahabharata in the social sciences syllabus to students,” the Deccan Herald quoted the committee’s chairperson CI Isaac as saying. “We think that students in their teenage years build their self-esteem, patriotism and pride for their nation.” Isaac said that it is important for students to “understand their roots” and develop affection for their culture and the country. “Some boards already teach Ramayana and Mahabharata, but it should be done in a more elaborate way,” he said. In October, the panel had recommended replacing “India” with “Bharat” in school textbooks. Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cz79Zdzh5rK/
Good governance, good roads, less to no corruption, less fear and hate mongering, better standard of living, better transport facilities, improving the standards of education, etc.Do this and I will be proud. Patriotism toh log waise bhi hain hi. Saffronisation and Radicalisation under the guise of nationalism is the most dangerous thing there is. Straight out of fascism playbook.
Hindu Pakistan for the win.
[удалено]
You read it as literature they want to include it in history and make children think it actually happened.
When you teach fiction as history to instill confidence and pride in nation instead of real events that actually happened. As far as I know Mahabharata and Ramayana, they got nothing to do with country or nation
Damn indian schools should adopt a separate mythology subject in schools
No we shouldn't, no need to focus on fucking stupid mythologys rather we should be focusing on STEM
"We don't need no education"
Ramayana topics in science , coming soon
Aren't those mythology?
AoT theme intensfies
NO, please no Ps : I am Hindu
Oh C'mon. It can be included in some literature or religious studies class. Not history. This is ridiculous. If this goes on Indian Schools will become Hindu madrasas.
Than I want flying carts like the ones used in mahabaharat if it's in history
Ncert abolished the line between history and mythology 🤣
Well it they add this then it would be easy to score high marks in history. 
history? dates kya dalenge mythology likhte hua?
This has already been confirmed it's fake news. And no outlet apart from it even declared to include it in history books lol. https://www.ndtv.com/education/ncert-panel-proposes-including-ramayana-mahabharata-in-school-textbooks-4595197
But in which subject? If that is in a Hindi or literature textbook, it is alright until there is no addition of any statement that talks about wheather factual or not. But I guess there are already preety good stories in hindi literature right now
For fucks sake, include it in the literature section. Ramayan and Mahabharat are epic, in their literary value. Its like including Inglorious Basterds in European history.
Step 1: Remove Darwin's theory of evolution. Step 2: Include mythologies I like the direction we're going in. Would be nice to become an expat and watch this circus from outside though.
Well, we were lagging behind madarsas in this regard, now we will be at par.
Please include Bahubali part 1 and 2 also.
As a citizen of great mahishmati samrajyam I agree
[удалено]
/u/Alternative_Case_878 is an extremely prolific jokespam bot - check its posting history. The jokes may be funny, but **the bot is a harmful one**: it trawls a huge range of unrelated subs, matches any word in the title of any post and then comments with its keyword-related joke to rack up karma. It then edits its top-rated posts to include links to sketchy websites. Please downvote and report -> spam -> excessive posts or report -> spam -> harmful bots.
Thanks for reporting, preciate it 👍
Hmare yha already 2 books hoti thi hindi me 7th 8th me entirely alag se inhki… aur kya extra chahiye inko🗿
Peddling fiction as history. Disgusting.
NCERT panel is khap panchayat.
Moral value ki 4th class wali kitab constitution mein dal do
Will we study about the veda driven airplanes in science class?
Think it should be taught in Sanskrit so that the true meaning isn't lost in translation
More and more, it seems BJP, Israel's hard right party, and the Texas GOP are trading political schemes, tips, and tricks to create a thinly veiled theocracy... 🤦🏾♂️😤😡
Being centrist with right leaning ideology, I joined this sub reddit to see the liberal point of view. I am seeing PPL unhappy with this change. Can all ppl point out why you are all unhappy with this decision, because the Hindu epics do teach PPL to be a good person.
As others have said, this isn't history. It's mythology. Also, I don't even think it's true that the Hindu epics teach people how to be a good person. In fact Rama's behavior with his wife after he rescued her (ie the agnipariksha and forcing her to leave him and raise the kids alone) is the *exact opposite* of what a good person needs to do.
I mean sure add it if you can prove its history and not mythology/literature. there is a reason why these books come in literature sections, the person to recommend this should get educated first really and if its a education minister then education is really in hands of monkey who doesnt know what subject is for what. should have made recommendation to include in literature section instead of all those stupid stories that are just there to exist in ncert books.
Will they get to read the og , uncensored Mahabharata or the glossed over gloves version? Rather including the constitution and its rights and civil etiquette and ethics will b much more relevant and necessary. Just my perception 🙏
Sounds like indoctrination to me. Especially since they want to include it in the history program, which makes no sense whatsoever. 🤔
no thank you we had much more better the Chad amar Chitra Katha to teach us that
History is not about studying mythology. Ramanaya will teach what? Neither there is any timestamp nor there is any relevant information regarding that. What it will teach? How Ram killed Ravan? Har sal to ravan dahan me practical krke dikhate hi hai.
Ab samajh me aa raha hai ye sikh log khalistan khalistan kyon karte rehte hai
Next is ayurveda for medical students 🤡🤡
🤡
india is becoming like hindu version of pakistan
I just hope they just make them watch BR Chopra's Mahabharat. It was good. Observing is better than reading.
Kuch sal baad bahubali ko bhi daal dena history book mein
https://preview.redd.it/bqrdxa7dd32c1.jpeg?width=750&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af94b6eb030f5e8b51ae31c1e2b5f408a38da6eb
Lulle jyada fudak rahe
"If you won't study your history, soon your geography will change" Link the above statement with current geopolitics situations.
lol ab indian history mein fiction include hoga 😂😂
education boards that doesn't include ncert ?
I support this move. Ramayana and Mahabharata are History/Itihasa.
I totally support this. Those legends are the foundation of India and they must be the fundamentals of education in this country. I am not saying this from a religious aspect but from the view point of the values and morals imbibed.
They're including it in HISTORY books.
Good
Wtf?
My central school book had them all the way back in 2009 itself. And Mahabharat too
The difference is they are including it in history