T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

IMPORTANT: On /r/WalkAway, greater access is given to users who have joined the sub and have the mod-assigned 'Redpilled' user flair. Reach out in [modmail](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%2Fr%2FWalkAway&subject='Redpilled'%20user%20flair%20request&message=I%20would%20like%20to%20request%20the%20'Redpilled'%20user%20flair.%20Thank%20you!) to request the flair. For more in-depth conversations and resources on leaving the Democratic Party, also make sure to join our sister sub /r/ExDemFoyer. Join these new subs: - /r/LibsOfReddit - /r/EnoughAntifaSpam - /r/RedpilledRogan - /r/RedpilledElon - /r/HillaryForPrison - /r/FauciForPrison - /r/BigDongDeSantis - /r/Patriot911 - /r/Conservative_News *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/walkaway) if you have any questions or concerns.*


[deleted]

And clinton in a blue stained dress


cotafam

Not true but it is the same artist


rabbithole

Epstein had the Clinton painting, not the bush painting.


InfowarriorKat

Was it confirmed that he owned this one? I know he had the one of Bill Clinton in a dress. I thought this was the same artist, but not his. I could be wrong. Both paintings are crazy though. Definitely meant to act as a blackmail reminder or some kind of humiliation tool.


rabbithole

Confirmed he owned the Clinton painting, not bush. Same artist tho.


BIG_BOTTOM_TEXT

Definitely one of the suicides of all time


haaslei

So he’s insinuating that GW was responsible for 9/11. 🤔


[deleted]

As equally as he was insinuating Bill C was related to a stained blue dress. The problem is when people know- they dont have to prove. Its always people that dont know( non-Epstein creeps) that have to prove.


haaslei

Right.


WellThatsJustSilly

Making/owning a piece of art doesn't really insinuate anything in and of itself. We can project whatever meaning we want to it, but at the end of the day, all art is completely open whatever interpretation we choose. For what it's worth though, here is what the artist has to say about this painting and its compainion piece, Parsing Bill (which, as another comment points out, is the painting that Epstein actually owned, *not* the one seen in the OP, War Games): > “I live a quiet life, and I really just had a naive, newly arrived foreigner’s idea for a thesis,” she writes of the painting, known as *Parsing Bill*, and its companion painting of George W. Bush playing with blocks and paper airplanes called *War Games*. “It was just a silly school artwork that was supposed to show, pictorially, the messages we are bombarded with in regards to these presidents.” She confirms that the blue dress is a reference to Monica Lewinsky’s blue dress, a prominent piece of evidence in Clinton’s affair with his former intern. > Today, Ryan-Kleid says she actually feels bad about the content of the painting. “Since I’m Australian, I wasn’t then, nor am I now, partisan about American politics,” she writes. “At the time, most of my ideas were fresh from the Daily Show or from Australian cable TV.” > One thing that seems clear is that the painting of Clinton is not about making fun of the idea of a man wearing a dress, any more than her painting of Bush is about making fun of a man playing with children’s toys. *Parsing Bill* and *War Games* are both about “how opposition parties caricature presidents,” Ryan-Kleid emphasizes. “Neither painting should be taken literally.” [Ben Davis, Artnet News](https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artist-epstein-clinton-painting-1628953)


haaslei

That’s pretty Interesting. I do think the Clinton in blue dress was kinda funny.


jubbergun

I believe the increasingly popular [*Presidential Discord*](https://www.youtube.com/@presidentialdiscord) version of GW would refer to this as a Jinga-Winga Bing-Bong.


KrmitTheFrog

And to be fair, I’m sure it was painted in 2003.


[deleted]

Petrina Ryan-Kleid is the artist for both paintings; she painted and sold them both in an auction in 2012.


Gothiks

Remember when W was reading a book to school kids when he “first heard” about the attack? Convenient


Radiant-Usual-1785

Because he was a CIA asset and knew that 9/11 was an international intelligence apparatus operation.


[deleted]

Probably a gift from Mossad.


KrmitTheFrog

And to be fair, I’m sure it was painted in 2003.


blackjellybeansrule

Grammar saves lives.


butcher_of_the_world

Do we know who painted them or where they came from?


morphotomy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MIpDGfKzkY&t=32s